Category: Meeting Updates

Maintenance Therapy with REVLIMID® Prolongs PFS in High Risk CLL

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 20,110 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in 2017 and approximately 4660 patients will die from the disease. CLL is a heterogeneous disease with a clinical course that is variable, with a very indolent course in some patients and some with aggressive disease and others somewhere in between. Both Binet and the Rai CLL staging systems developed in the 1970’s rely solely on physical examination and standard laboratory testing to predict survival. With the development of Interphase Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technique, which allows detection of genetic abnormalities in noncycling CLL cells, it has become clear that cytogenetic abnormalities are often seen in CLL patients and these genetic abnormalities in turn appear to be reliable predictors of disease progression, response to therapy and survival. Some of these cytogenetic abnormalities include del(13q), normal karyotype, trisomy(12), del(11q), del(17p), and they are associated with decreasing survival times, in that order. Another important prognostic factor is the rearrangement and somatic hypermutation of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (IGHV), which is an independent predictor of outcome in CLL. Retrospective studies have suggested that patients with CLL whose leukemic cells unmutated IGHV gene demonstrated more aggressive disease and shorter survival time compared to those patients with somatic hypermutations in their IGHV genes (Mutated IGHV gene). Expression of two flow cytometry based biomarkers, CD38 (surface marker) and ZAP-70 (intracytoplasmic protein), have been associated with poor outcomes as well.

The rationale for maintenance treatment in the CLL patients is based on previously published studies showing that about 30% of patients with CLL did not substantially benefit from chemoimmunotherapy alone. These patients belong to the high risk group, as defined by poor cytogenetics, positive Minimal Residual Disease at the end of chemoimmunotherapy and unmutated IGHV gene status. The combined use of Genetic markers and Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessment can therefore identify patients with CLL, who have a poor outcome with first line chemoimmunotherapy.

Maintenance therapy with REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide)/Dexamethasone is considered standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma, regardless of transplantation and for newly diagnosed non-transplant candidates, as this intervention was found to improve Progression Free Survival significantly, with a favorable safety profile. Two phase III studies demonstrating the benefit of maintenance treatment with REVLIMID® in patients with CLL, were presented at the 2016 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition. The first study (CLL M1 study) was conducted to demonstrate the value of maintenance treatment with REVLIMID® in patients with high risk CLL, following first line chemoimmunotherapy. For this study, 468 patients were screened, of whom 89 patients (N=89) were considered as high risk for disease progression, following 4 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. This was based on the following factors: MRD levels of 10-2 or higher or MRD levels of 10-4 or higher to less than 10-2, combined with either an unmutated IGHV gene status, del(17p) or TP53 mutation at baseline.

Patients received investigator’s choice of chemoimmunotherapy regimens which included Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR), Fludarabine and Rituximab (FR), Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC), or Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR). The most common regimens administered were Bendamustine and Rituximab followed by FCR. Approximately 78% of all patients reached Minimal Residual Disease negativity and these patients were ineligible for this trial. The 89 eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive REVLIMID® maintenance (N=60) or Placebo (N=29). Treatment with REVLIMID® or Placebo was started at 5 mg daily for the first cycle, and was subsequently increased to the target dose of 15 mg by the 7th cycle. The median age of these patients was 64 years. At randomization, 37% of patients had a high and 63% had an intermediate MRD level, respectively. Based on their risk for thromboembolic events, patients received either low dose aspirin daily or appropriate prophylactic anticoagulants. The primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS).

After a median follow up of 17.7 months, the median PFS for REVLIMID® group has not been reached and was 13.3 months for the Placebo group. This meant a relative risk reduction for disease progression of 80% and this was highly statistically significant (P < 0.00001). There was no difference in Overall Survival at the time of this interim analysis. Adverse events such as neutropenia, diarrhea, skin disorders, etc. were more frequently noted with REVLIMID® maintenance treatment.

The authors concluded that REVLIMID® maintenance treatment for high risk CLL patients, after first line chemoimmunotherapy, significantly prolonged Progression Free Survival and this study confirmed the prognostic significance of the MRD based risk assessment.

The second study, CONTINUUM Trial, is a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded phase III study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REVLIMID® as maintenance therapy in previously treated CLL patients. In this study, 314 CLL patients who at least had a partial response (PR) to second line therapy were randomized 1:1 to receive either REVLIMID® 2.5 mg once daily on days 1-28 of the first 28 day cycle, or matching Placebo. If tolerated, REVLIMID® dose was then increased to 5 mg daily from cycle 2, and further increased to 10 mg daily at cycle 7 and thereafter. Co-primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival and secondary endpoints included Safety, Tumor response, Duration of Response and Health related Quality of Life measures.

At a median follow up of 31.5 months, the median PFS was significantly longer for the REVLIMID® group compared to the Placebo group (33.9 vs 9.2 months; HR=0.40; P<0.001). This benefit with REVLIMID® maintenance was maintained in all patient subgroups regardless of age, prior response to chemotherapy and number of poor prognostic factors.

The authors in this trial concluded that REVLIMID® maintenance resulted in a 60% reduction in the risk of disease progression in patients with CLL following second line treatment, and there was no meaningful difference in the Quality of Life between the two treatment groups.

Taken together, these two phase III studies suggest that REVLIMID® maintenance therapy following either first line or second line chemoimmunotherapy, significantly prolongs Progression Free Survival in patients with CLL. This strategy will however not be applicable to patients receiving upfront chemotherapy-free regimens such as BTK Inhibitor, IMBRUVICA® (Ibrutinib).

1. Lenalidomide maintenance after front line therapy substantially prolongs progression free survival in high risk CLL. Fink AM, Bahlo J, Sandra R, et al. 2016 ASH Annual Meeting. Abstract 229. Presented December 3, 2016.

2. Results of the phase 3 study of lenalidomide versus placebo as maintenance therapy following second-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Foà R, Schuh A, Zaritskey A, et al. 2016 ASH Annual Meeting. Abstract 230. Presented December 3, 2016.

Antibiotics May Impair the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that about 63,990 new cases of kidney cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2017 and about 14,400 patients will die from this disease. The understanding of the Immune checkpoints has lead to the development of novel immunotherapies. Immune checkpoints or gate keepers are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions. Survival of cancer cells may be related to their ability to escape immune surveillance, by inhibiting T lymphocyte activation. With the recognition of Immune checkpoint proteins and their role in suppressing antitumor immunity, antibodies have been developed that target the membrane bound inhibitory Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors such as PD-1(Programmed cell Death-1), etc. Following inhibition of PD-1 by specific antibodies, T cells are unleashed, resulting in T cell proliferation and activation with subsequent therapeutic responses.

Preclinical studies have suggested that immune-based therapies for cancer may have a very complex interplay with the host’s microbiome and there may be a relationship between gut bacteria and immune response to cancer. Broad-spectrum antibiotics can alter the bacterial composition and bacterial diversity of our gut, by killing the good bacteria. It has been postulated that this may negate the benefits of immunotherapy and influence treatment outcomes. Previously published studies have shown that intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of YERVOY® (Ipilimumab), an Immune checkpoint inhibitor.

The authors in this publication evaluated the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, in patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, 80 mRCC patients treated in prospective trials with checkpoint inhibitors were enrolled. These patients had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, primarily Nivolumab (N=67), a combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and a CTLA-4 inhibitor such as Ipilimumab (N=10), and a combination of anti-PD-L1 therapy and Bevacizumab (N=3). A majority of the patients (65%) were male, 88% had mRCC with clear cell histology, and 80% of the patients had prior nephrectomy. Using IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) criteria, 21% had favorable risk disease, 57% had intermediate risk and 22% had poor risk disease. Sixteen patients (20%) had been treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, mostly Beta-lactamases or Fluoroquinolones, for up to 1 month prior to starting treatment with immunotherapy. A retrospective analysis was conducted and the Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), and Overall Survival (OS), in the group that received broad-spectrum antibiotics, were compared with the group that did not receive broad-spectrum antibiotics.

It was noted that the PFS was four-fold higher in patients who did not receive antibiotics compared to those who received antibiotics (8.1 months vs 2.3 months, P<0.001) and this was statistically significant. This benefit was maintained after adjusting for age, gender, IMDC risk groups, tumor burden and proton pump inhibitors. Additionally, the ORR was higher in those who did not receive antibiotics compared to those who were treated with antibiotics (P<0.002). At a median follow up of less than 6 months, there was already a negative trend in Overall Survival, driven by broad-spectrum antibiotic usage.

It was concluded that in this first analysis, broad-spectrum antibiotics had a negative impact on outcomes, among patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors. Caution should therefore be exercised when prescribing antibiotics to this patient group, so that the efficacy of immunotherapy is not compromised. These concerns may be true across different tumor types and additional follow up is underway. Impact of antibiotics on outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Derosa L, Routy B, Enot D, et al. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl 6S; abstract 462)

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2017 Single Dose Radiation Therapy as Effective as Multiple Fractions for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

RR

SUMMARY: Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) first described by Spiller in 1925, is an oncologic emergency and is a well recognized complication of cancer. Approximately 10% of all patients with cancer develop metastatic disease to the spinal column. Even though any solid tumor can metastasize to the spine, more than 50% of MSCC cases are caused by breast cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer. The risk of MSCC is particularly high in those patients with widespread malignancy and those with known spinal metastases. Pathological compression fracture of the vertebral body or direct tumor invasion can cause compression of the spinal cord or cauda equina resulting in irreversible neurological deficit as well as paraplegia. Common symptoms include back pain, tingling, numbness and difficulty walking. Early recognition of symptoms and prompt intervention is therefore imperative to prevent neurological damage.

Patients with MSCC, in addition to steroids, are often treated with Radiation Therapy (RT) to relieve pain and improve neurological function and mobility. There is however no standard Radiation Therapy schedule. ASTRO (American Society for Radiation Oncology) in its “Choosing Wisely” guidelines recommended not using extended fractionated schemes (more than 10 fractions) for palliation of bone metastases. Equivalent pain relief can be accomplished following 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or a single 8 Gy fraction. It was also recommended that strong consideration should be given to a single 8 Gy fraction, for patients with a limited prognosis or with transportation difficulties.

SCORAD III is a randomized phase III study which evaluated whether a single-dose Radiation Therapy (RT) was as effective as multifraction RT administered over 5 days, without compromising patient outcomes. Enrolled patients (N=688) were randomized 1:1 to receive External Beam spinal canal RT as a single dose of 8 Gy (N=345) or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (N=343). Eligible patients had spinal cord or cauda equina (C1-S2) compression, confirmed by MRI/CT scan, treatable within a single radiation field, with no prior RT to the same area and had a life expectancy of more than 8 weeks. The median age was 70 years, 73% were male and 44% had metastatic prostate, 18% had metastatic lung, 11% had metastatic breast and another 11% had metastatic GastroIntestinal cancers. Patients were stratified by Ambulatory Status (AS), site of primary, and presence or absence of non-skeletal metastases. The primary endpoint of the study was Ambulatory Status, measured on a four-point scale – Grade 1: Able to walk normally, Grade 2: Able to walk with a walking aid (such as a cane or walker), Grade 3: Has difficulty walking even with walking aids and Grade 4: Dependent on wheelchair. Two third of the patients (66%) were ambulatory with or without walking aids (Ambulatory Status of 1 to 2) at study entry.

It was noted that at 8 weeks, 69.5% of patients who received single-dose radiation therapy and 73.3% of those who received five doses had an Ambulatory Status of 1 to 2 and could walk normally or with a walking aid such as a cane or a walker, suggesting that both single dose and longer course radiation treatments helped patients with their mobility. The median Overall Survival was similar in the two treatment groups – 12.4 weeks with a single dose versus 13.7 weeks with five doses, and this was not statistically significant (HR=1.02; P=0.81). The proportion of patients experiencing severe side effects was similar in the two treatment groups (20.6% vs 20.4%), but mild side effects were less common in the single dose of 8 Gy group compared to those receiving multiple fractions (51% vs 56.9%).

The authors concluded that a single radiation dose of 8 Gy in patients with metastatic Spinal Cord Compression was non-inferior and was as effective as longer course multiple fractions, for Ambulatory Status at 8 weeks, as well as Overall Survival. They added that this would mean fewer hospital visits and more time with the family, at least for patients with a short life expectancy. It should however be noted that in this study, at the time of enrollment, majority of patients were fully ambulatory or were able to walk with a walking aid. Whether single dose radiation therapy is adequate for those patients with very advanced involvement of the spine, however remains to be seen. SCORAD III: Randomized non-inferiority phase III trial of single dose radiotherapy (RT) compared to multifraction RT in patients (pts) with metastatic spinal canal compression (SCC). Hoskin P, Misra V, Hopkins K, et al. J Clin Oncol. 35;2017 (suppl; abstr LBA10004).

FDA Approves IDHIFA® for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on August 1, 2017 granted regular approval to IDHIFA® (Enasidenib), for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with an Isocitrate DeHydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test. The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2017, 21,380 new cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) will be diagnosed in the United States and 10,590 patients will die of the disease. AML can be considered as a group of heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior and outcomes. Cytogenetic analysis has been part of routine evaluation when caring for patients with AML. By predicting resistance to therapy, tumor cytogenetics will stratify patients, based on risk and help manage them accordingly. Even though cytotoxic chemotherapy may lead to long term remission and cure in a minority of patients with favorable cytogenetics, patients with high risk features such as unfavorable cytogenetics, molecular abnormalities, prior myelodysplasia and advanced age, have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy alone.

Isocitrate DeHydrogenase (IDH) is a metabolic enzyme that helps generate energy from glucose and other metabolites by catalyzing the conversion of Isocitrate to Alpha-Ketoglutarate. Alpha-ketoglutarate is required to properly regulate DNA and histone methylation, which in turn is important for gene expression and cellular differentiation. IDH mutations lead to aberrant DNA methylation and altered gene expression thereby preventing cellular differentiation, with resulting immature undifferentiated cells. IDH mutations may thus promote leukemogenesis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and tumorigenesis in solid tumors. There are three isoforms of IDH. IDH1 is mainly found in the cytoplasm, as well as in peroxisomes, whereas IDH2 and IDH3 are found in the mitochondria, and are a part of the Krebs cycle. Approximately 20% of patients with AML, 70% of patients with Low-grade Glioma and secondary Glioblastoma, 50% of patients with Chondrosarcoma, 20% of patients with Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 30% of patients with Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and 8% of patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes/Myeloproliferative neoplasms, are associated with IDH mutations.

IDHIFA® is an oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of mutated IDH2 protein. The approval of IDHIFA® was based on an open label, single arm, multicenter, clinical trial that included 199 adults with relapsed or refractory AML, who had an IDH2 mutation as detected by the RealTime IDH2 Assay. Patients received IDHIFA® 100 mg orally daily. The median age was 67 years, the median number of prior therapies was 2 and a third of the patients had unfavorable cytogenetics. Study endpoints included Complete Response (CR) and Complete Response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rates, CR/CRh duration, and conversion from transfusion dependence to transfusion independence.

After a median follow up of 6.6 months, 23% of patients experienced CR or CRh lasting a median of 8.2 months, with 19% of patients having a CR lasting a median 8.2 months, and 4% with a CRh lasting a median 9.6 months. The median time to first response was 1.9 months and the median time to best response of CR/CRh was 3.7 months. Of the 157 patients who required transfusions at the initiation of the trial, 34% of the patients no longer required transfusions during at least one 8 week time period on IDHIFA®. Of the 42 patients who did not require transfusions at the start of the study, 76% maintained transfusion independence. The most common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, elevated bilirubin and decreased appetite. Differentiation syndrome occurred in 14% of patients and these patients should be promptly managed, as this could be fatal.

The authors concluded that IDHIFA® is well tolerated and induced lasting Complete Responses in patients who had failed prior AML therapies, with the clinical efficacy related to differentiation of myeloblasts rather than cytotoxicity. This is the first FDA approval for relapsed or refractory AML specifically with an IDH2 mutation. Enasidenib in mutant-IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML): Results of a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study. Stein EM, Dinardo CD, Pollyea DA, et al. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 7004).

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2017 Adjuvant Dual HER2 Regimen of PERJETA® and HERCEPTIN® Improves Outcomes in Early Stage Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately, 255,180 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2017 and over 41,070 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15%-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2. Trastuzumab binds to subdomain IV of the HER2 extracellular domain and blocks the downstream cell signaling pathways (PI3K-AKT pathway) and induces Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC). Adjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the HER2 at a different epitope of the HER2 extracellular domain (subdomain II) compared to HERCEPTIN® and prevents the dimerization of HER2 with HER3 receptor. PERJETA® induces ADCC similar to HERCEPTIN®. By combining HERCEPTIN® and PERJETA®, a more comprehensive blockade of HER2 signaling can be accomplished, as these two agents bind to different HER2 epitopes and may complement each other and improve efficacy. In the CLEOPATRA study, the addition of PERJETA® to HERCEPTIN® and Docetaxel resulted in significant improvement in Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), in patients with HER-positive metastatic breast cancer. This triple drug combination also resulted in a significantly increased pathological Complete Response rate, when given in a neoadjuvant setting (NeoSphere trial).

Based on these previously published efficacy data, the authors in this study investigated whether the addition of PERJETA® to adjuvant HERCEPTIN® and chemotherapy, improves outcomes, among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. APHINITY is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial in which a total of 4805 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to receive standard adjuvant anthracycline or non-anthracycline chemotherapy regimen along with HERCEPTIN® plus either PERJETA® (2400 patients) or placebo (2405 patients). Anti-HER2 therapy was administered for a total of 1 year. Patients could receive radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy following completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. Eligible patients had node-positive or high-risk node-negative (tumor diameter greater than 1.0 cm), HER2-positive, non-metastatic, adequately excised breast cancer. Both treatment groups were well balanced and about 37% of the patients had 1-3 positive lymph nodes and 25% of the patients had 4 or more positive lymph nodes. Two thirds of the patients were hormone receptor positive and about 78% of the patients received an anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The median follow up was 45.4 months and one year of treatment was completed by approximately 85% of the patients in both treatment groups. The primary end point was Disease Free Survival (DFS) from invasive breast cancer and secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS) and DFS from non-invasive breast cancers.

The addition of PERJETA® to chemotherapy and HERCEPTIN® resulted in a higher rate of DFS for invasive breast cancer with a 3-year invasive DFS of 94.1% in the PERJETA® group and 93.2% in the placebo group (HR=0.81; P=0.045), in favor of PERJETA®. Patients in the high risk subgroups benefited the most. The 3-year invasive DFS for patients with node-positive disease was 92.0% in the PERJETA® group, compared with 90.2% in the placebo group (HR=0.77; P=0.02). In the cohort of patients with hormone receptor negative tumors, the 3-year invasive DFS was 92.8% in the PERJETA® group and 91.2% in the placebo group (HR=0.76; P=0.08). The site of first distant recurrence was visceral or in the CNS rather than the bone. Cardiac toxicities were uncommon in both treatment groups and patients in the PERJETA® group had higher incidence of diarrhea while on concurrent chemotherapy.

It was concluded that for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, the addition of PERJETA® to standard postoperative HERCEPTIN® based adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly improved Disease Free Survival for invasive breast cancer. This benefit was more so for those patients with high risk disease. APHINITY trial (BIG 4-11): A randomized comparison of chemotherapy (C) plus trastuzumab (T) plus placebo (Pla) versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (T) plus pertuzumab (P) as adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). von Minckwitz G, Procter MJ, De Azambuja E, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl; abstr LBA500).

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2017 Dacomitinib Superior to IRESSA® in EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2017 about 222,500 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and over 155,000 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 25% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large cell carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer. Approximately 10% to 15% of Caucasian patients and 50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations and 90% of these mutations are either Exon 19 deletions or L858R point mutations in Exon 21. EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as TARCEVA® (Erlotinib), IRESSA® (Gefitinib) and GILOTRIF® (Afatinib), have demonstrated a 60% to 70% response rate as monotherapy when administered as first line treatment, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who harbor the sensitizing EGFR mutations.

Dacomitinib is a potent, irreversible, second-generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and inhibits three members of the ErbB protein family, including EGFR/HER1, HER2 and HER4. Based on the encouraging clinical activity of Dacomitinib in treatment naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, harboring activating EGFR mutations, in a phase II study (The Lancet Oncology 2014;15:1433-1441), the authors conducted a randomized phase III trial, comparing Dacomitinib with IRESSA®, as first line therapy in this patient population . This study (ARCHER 1050) randomized 452 patients in a 1:1 ratio to either receive Dacomitinib 45 mg PO daily (N=227) or IRESSA® 250 mg PO daily (N=225). Eligible patients had newly diagnosed stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC, harboring an activating EGFR mutation (Exon 19 deletions or L858R point mutations in Exon 21, with or without Exon 20 T790M mutations). Treatments groups were well balanced and patients were stratified by race and EGFR mutation subtype. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DoR).

The median PFS for patients who received Dacomitinib was 14.7 months compared with 9.2 months for the group who received IRESSA® (HR=0.59; P<0.0001). This meant a 41% reduction in the risk of cancer progression or death with Dacomitinib compared with IRESSA®. The median Duration of Response was 14.8 months with Dacomitinib versus 8.3 months with IRESSA® (HR= 0.40; P<0.0001). As expected, patients in the Dacomitinib group experienced more side effects such as skin rash and diarrhea and this has been attributed to the stronger suppression of the EGFRs in the normal healthy tissues.

The authors concluded that ARCHER 1050 is the first phase III trial comparing EGFR TKIs head-to-head, and this study demonstrated clinically meaningful superiority of Dacomitinib, when compared to IRESSA®, in treatment naïve NSCLC patients, with activating EGFR mutations. Further, the PFS achieved with Dacomitinib in this study is among the highest observed, when compared with other EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, for this cancer type. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib for the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): A randomized, open-label phase III trial. Mok T, Cheng Y, Zhou X, et al. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr LBA9007)

Adjuvant Therapy with XELODA® Improves Overall Survival in Biliary Tract Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Bile Duct cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma), comprise about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with bile duct cancer each year. The average age of an individual in the US diagnosed with bile duct cancer is 71 years and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection. The 5-year survival is less than 10%. There is no standard adjuvant therapy for patients with resectable bile duct cancer, although adjuvant intervention in a previously reported meta-analysis showed improved Overall Survival (Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, et al. JCO 2012;30:1934-1940).

The BILCAP trial is a phase III study conducted to determine whether XELODA® (Capecitabine) improved Overall Survival (OS) compared to Observation, following radical surgery. In this trial, 447 patients were randomized to receive XELODA® (N=223) or Observation (N=224). Eligible patients had completely resected, cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer (including liver and pancreatic resection, as appropriate), with a R0 resection (microscopically negative margin resection) for 62% and R1 resection (removal of all macroscopic disease, but microscopic margins are positive for tumor) for 38% and with negative lymph nodes in 46% of the patients. The primary disease sites were extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (35%), hilar (28%), intrahepatic (19%), and muscle-invasive gallbladder cancers (18%). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive XELODA® 1250 mg/m2, D1-14 every 21 days, for 8 cycles or Observation. The median age was 63 years and the follow up was at least 36 months in more than 80% of the surviving patients. The primary end point was Overall Survival in the Intent to Treat population and the primary analysis was performed with at least 24 months of follow up.

The median Overall Survival with XELODA® was 51 months compared with 36 months for Observation, and this was not statistically significant (P=0.097). In the sensitivity analyses however, with adjustment for nodal status, gender and grade of the disease, there was a 29% reduction in the risk of death with adjuvant XELODA®, when compared with Observation (HR=0.71; P < 0.01). In the per-protocol analysis which included 430 patients, the median Overall Survival was 53 months with adjuvant XELODA® versus 36 months with Observation, resulting in a 25% reduction in the risk of death with XELODA®, and these results were statistically significant (HR=0.75; P=0.028). The most common adverse events related to XELODA® as anticipated were, palmar plantar erythema, fatigue and diarrhea.

The authors concluded that single agent XELODA® improves Overall Survival in Biliary Tract Cancer, when used as adjuvant therapy, without a negative impact on Quality of Life. They added that this is the first phase III study to show a survival benefit in the adjuvant setting, and should become standard of care. Adjuvant capecitabine for biliary tract cancer: The BILCAP randomized study. Primrose JN, Fox R, Palmer DH, et al. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr 4006)

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2017 Three Months of Adjuvant Therapy Adequate for Stage III Colon Cancer Patients with T1-3, N1 Disease

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 135,430 new cases of ColoRectal Cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2017 and over 50,260 patients are expected to die of the disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected, locally advanced, node-positive (stage III) colon cancer, has been the standard of care since 1990s. Adjuvant treatment with an ELOXATIN® (Oxaliplatin) based chemotherapy regimen has been considered standard intervention since 2004, for patients with stage III colon cancer following surgical resection and has been proven to decrease the chance of recurrent disease. Chemotherapy regimens have included (FOLFOX – Leucovorin, 5-FluoroUracil, ELOXATIN®) or CAPOX/XELOX (XELODA®/Capecitabine and ELOXATIN®/Oxaliplatin), given over a period of 6 months. ELOXATIN® can however be associated with neuropathy which can be long lasting or permanent, depending on the duration of therapy. Additional toxicities with longer duration of chemotherapy include diarrhea, fatigue as well as more office visits.

The IDEA Collaboration is a prospective, pre-planned pooled analysis of 6 concurrently conducted randomized phase III trials which included 12,834 patients from 12 countries. The goal of this study was to determine if 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy would be as effective as 6 months of therapy and would be Non Inferior. Of the enrolled patients with Stage III disease, 13% had T1-2 disease, 66% had T3 disease, and 21% had T4 tumors. Twenty eight percent (28%) of the patients had N2 disease and 40% of the patients received XELOX chemotherapy. Approximately 60% had low-risk disease (T1-3, N1) and 40% had high-risk (T4 or N2). The primary endpoint was Disease Free Survival (DFS). The median follow up was 39 months.

It was noted that a shorter 3 month course of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a less than 1% lower risk of recurrence at 3 years compared to the standard 6 month course of therapy (74.6% versus 75.5%). In the subset of patients considered to be at low risk of cancer recurrence (1-3 positive lymph nodes and tumor not completely penetrating through the bowel wall), there was almost no difference in the DFS between a 3-month versus 6-month course of therapy (83.1% vs 83.3%). Even though Non Inferiority was not established for the overall cohort of patients, patients with stage T1-3 N1 disease showed Non Inferiority for 3 months versus 6 month course of adjuvant therapy. Further, 3 months of XELOX adjuvant therapy was Non Inferior to 6 months of ELOXATIN® based adjuvant therapy. Grade 2 or more neurotoxicity was significantly lower for patients who received 3 months of adjuvant therapy versus 6 months (P <0.0001), regardless of the treatment regimen (17% vs 48% for FOLFOX and 15% vs 45% for XELOX, respectively).

It was concluded by the IDEA collaboration that, a risk-based approach has to be taken when making adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for patients with stage III colon cancer. Three months of adjuvant chemotherapy is adequate for patients with T1-3, N1 disease. For patients with T4 and/or N2 disease or other high risk factors, the duration of adjuvant therapy has to be determined based on patient preference, assessment of recurrent risk and tolerability. Prospective pooled analysis of six phase III trials investigating duration of adjuvant (adjuv) oxaliplatin-based therapy (3 vs 6 months) for patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer (CC): The IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant chemotherapy) collaboration. Shi Q, Sobrero AF, Shields AF, et al. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr LBA1)

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2017 Targeted Therapy Based on Genomic Profiling Improves Overall Survival

RR

SUMMARY: Tumor genomic profiling enables the identification of specific genomic alterations and thereby can provide personalized treatment options with targeted therapies that are specific for those molecular targets. A genomic test can be performed on a tumor specimen or on cell-free DNA in plasma (“liquid biopsy”) or an ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) test can be performed on tumor tissue for protein expression that demonstrates a genomic variant known to be a drug target, or to predict sensitivity to a chemotherapeutic drug. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms or second-generation sequencing unlike the first-generation sequencing, known as Sanger sequencing, perform massively parallel sequencing, which allows sequencing of millions of fragments of DNA from a single sample. With this high-throughput sequencing, the entire genome can be sequenced in less than 24 hours. Recently reported genomic profiling studies performed in patients with advanced cancer suggest that actionable mutations are found in 20-40% of patients’ tumors.

ProfiLER is an ongoing, molecular profiling clinical trial, developed to guide treatment by exploring genomic alterations in cancer cells of patients with advanced malignancy. DNA extracted from either archival or fresh tumor tissue was analyzed by next-generation sequencing of 60 cancer-related genes and whole-genome comparative genomic hybridization, a methodology for rapidly comparing DNA samples. A multidisciplinary board of experts in genomic profiling analyzed the genomic test results data and recommended molecular targeted therapies, when actionable mutations were found. These therapies were either commercially available drugs or those being tested in early clinical trials.

This study enrolled 2,676 patients to date and 1,944 tumors were analyzed. They included colorectal, gynecologic, breast, brain, and head and neck cancers, as well as sarcomas. Actionable mutations were found in 1,004 tumor samples (52%), 609 patients had only 1 actionable mutation, and 394 patients had 2-6 actionable mutations. The most common actionable mutation involved the PI3K/mTOR pathway. The molecular tumor board recommended molecularly targeted treatments to 676 patients (35% of 1,944 patients tested). Of these 676 patients, 143 received the recommended treatment, mostly through enrollment in a clinical trial. The rest of the 533 patients were unable to receive the recommended treatment because of poor health, rapid tumor progression, not meeting eligibility criteria for a clinical trial, or difficulty obtaining off-label commercially available drugs.

The Overall Survival rates for the 143 patients who received targeted therapies based on genomic testing was then compared with the 533 patients who did not. The Overall Survival rate at 3 years for those patients who received the recommended molecular targeted therapy was 53.7% compared with 46.1% for those patients who did not. The 5-year Overall Survival rate was also higher for patients who received molecular targeted therapy compared to those who did not (34.8% versus 28.1%).

This study validated that comprehensive genomic profiling can be performed in routine clinical practice, to select patients for targeted cancer therapies. The TAPUR (Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry) study conducted by ASCO is underway and is aimed at collecting “real-world” data on clinical outcomes, to help learn additional uses of molecularly-targeted cancer drugs, outside of indications approved by the FDA. Routine molecular screening of advanced refractory cancer patients: An analysis of the first 2490 patients of the ProfilER Study. Tredan O, Corset V, Wang Q, et al. J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr LBA100)

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2017 Adding ZYTIGA® to Androgen Deprivation Therapy Improves Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Prostate Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer and 1 in 7 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 161,360 new cases of Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2017 and 26,730 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention for hormone sensitive prostate cancer. For patients with Castrate Resistant Prostate Carcinoma (CRPC), several agents have been proven to improve Overall Survival and they include, TAXOTERE® (Docetaxel), JEVTANA® (Cabazitaxel), ZYTIGA® (Abiraterone acetate), XTANDI® (Enzalutamide), XOFIGO® (Radium-223), and PROVENGE® (Sipuleucel-T).

The Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy (STAMPEDE) trial is an ongoing study and uses a novel multiarm, multistage (MAMS) platform design, to test whether the addition of further treatments to ADT improves Overall Survival, when used in first-line setting, for patients with hormone sensitive, locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. This group previously reported that there was a significantly improved Overall Survival with the addition of TAXOTERE® to initial ADT. This is presently the standard of care for appropriate patients with prostate cancer, who had not received prior hormone therapy. The barriers to chemo-hormonal therapy with TAXOTERE® include advanced patient age, poor Performance Status, comorbidities, patient preferences, as well as potential life threatening toxicities associated with TAXOTERE®.

ZYTIGA® is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of CYP 17A1 enzyme and decreases androgen biosynthesis in the testes, adrenal glands, and prostate-tumor tissue. Combining a CYP17A1 inhibitor such as ZYTIGA® with Androgen Deprivation Therapy is a more effective way of androgen depletion than with Orchiectomy or GnRH analogues alone. In this analysis, the STAMPEDE trial evaluated Overall Survival outcomes, with the earlier use of ZYTIGA®, in men with high risk, hormone sensitive prostate cancer, who were initiating long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

A total of 1917 patients were randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) alone (N=957) or ADT plus ZYTIGA® (N=960), administered at 1000 mg PO daily and prednisolone 5 mg PO daily (combination therapy). ADT was given for at least 2 years. Eligible patients had prostate cancer that was newly diagnosed and metastatic, node-positive, or high-risk locally advanced disease or prostate cancer that was previously treated with radical surgery or radiotherapy and was now relapsing with high-risk features. Patients with locally advanced disease could also receive radiation therapy in addition to ADT. Radiotherapy was mandated for patients with N0M0 disease and encouraged for those with stage N+M0 disease. The median age was 67 years, and the median PSA level was 53 ng/ml. Approximately 52% of the patients had metastatic disease, 20% had node-positive or node-indeterminate, non-metastatic disease, and 28% had node-negative, non-metastatic disease. Majority of the patients (95%) had newly diagnosed disease. The median follow up was 40 months.

There was a significant survival advantage with combination therapy with a 3-year Overall Survival of 83% with ADT plus ZYTIGA® compared with 76% with ADT alone group (HR=0.63; P<0.001). This meant a 37% reduction in the risk of death with the ZYTIGA® combination treatment. Further, the combination treatment reduced the risk of relapse by 71% (HR=0.29; P<0.001), and also reduced the risk of symptomatic skeletal events by 54% (HR=0.46; P<0.001), compared with ADT alone. Treatment overall was well tolerated.

It was concluded that ADT plus ZYTIGA® and prednisolone results in significantly higher rates of Overall Survival as well as Failure-Free Survival, compared with ADT alone, among men with hormone sensitive, locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. Interestingly, the LATITUDE trial showed similar findings in newly diagnosed, metastatic, hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients (June 4, 2017DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704174). The results of both STAMPEDE and LATITUDE trials will very likely change practice patterns and will become the new standard of care for this patient group. Abiraterone for Prostate Cancer Not Previously Treated with Hormone Therapy. James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. for the STAMPEDE Investigators. June 3, 2017DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702900