Category: Meeting Updates

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Improves Overall Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Bile Tract cancer (Cholangiocarcinoma) is a rare and highly aggressive heterogenous cancer, and is the second most common type of primary liver cancer after Hepatocellular carcinoma. It comprises about 30% of all primary liver tumors and includes both intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cancers. It is estimated that approximately 211,000 patients are diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer and 174,000 patients will die of the disease each year globally. Biliary Tract cancer is most frequently diagnosed in patients between 50 to 70 years old, and 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Klatskin tumor is a type of Cholangiocarcinoma that begins in the hilum, at the junction of the left and right bile ducts. It is the most common type of Cholangiocarcinoma, accounting for more than half of all cases. About 8,000 people in the US are diagnosed with Cholangiocarcinoma each year and approximately 20% of the cases are suitable for surgical resection. Patients diagnosed with Biliary Tract cancer have a very poor prognosis, and the 5-year survival among those with advanced stage disease is less than 10%, with limited progress made over the past two decades. There is therefore an urgent unmet need for new effective therapies.

Patients with advanced Biliary Tract cancers often receive chemotherapy in the first and second line settings, with limited benefit. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin combination is currently the first line standard-of-care treatment. With the recognition of immunogenic features displayed by Biliary Tract cancers, the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for improving disease control and prolonging survival has been increasingly explored.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

KEYNOTE-966 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, conducted to determine whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab to first line standard chemotherapy, would impact survival outcomes in patients with metastatic or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers. In this study, 1069 patients (N=1069) with advanced and/or unresectable Biliary Tract cancers were randomly assigned to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (N=533) or placebo (N=536). Both treatment groups received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks without preset maximum number of cycles, and Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles. The median age was 63.5 years, majority of patients had metastatic disease (88%) and more than half had intrahepatic disease. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response and Safety. The median follow up was 25.6 months.

The median OS was 12.7 months in the Pembrolizumab group and 10.9 months in the placebo group (HR=0.83; P=0.0034). This represented a 17% reduction in the risk of death in the Pembrolizumab group compared to the placebo group. The 12-month OS rate was 52% with the Pembrolizumab regimen versus 44% for chemotherapy alone and the 24-month OS rates were 24.9% versus 18.1%, respectively. The OS results were generally consistent across subgroups.

There was no significant difference in PFS between the treatment groups but there was a trend toward improved PFS with Pembrolizumab. The median PFS was 6.5 months in the Pembrolizumab arm and 5.6 months in the placebo group (HR=0.87; P=0.23). The estimated 12-month PFS was 25% and 20% respectively.The Objective Response Rates were similar between the two treatment groups – 28.7% in the Pembrolizumab group and 28.5% in the placebo arm.The safety profile of Pembrolizumab was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies and Grade 3-4 adverse events were similar between treatment groups.

The authors concluded that KEYNOTE-966 is the largest randomized Phase III trial in advanced Biliary Tract cancers to date, with more patients enrolled from non-Asian countries. First line treatment with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved Overall Survival, when compared with chemotherapy alone. The researchers added that one of the limitations of this study is that patients with intrahepatic bile duct cancers were overrepresented in the study population compared with the incidence of the disease in the general population, resulting in smaller sample sizes of patients with extrahepatic and gall bladder sites of origin.

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al. Lancet. Published online April 16, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4.

Personalized mRNA Cancer Vaccine in Combination with KEYTRUDA® Improves Relapse Free Survival in Resected High Risk Melanoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society’s estimates that for 2023, about 97,610 new cases of melanoma of the skin will be diagnosed in the United States and 7,990 people are expected to die of the disease. The rates of melanoma have been rising rapidly over the past few decades, but this has varied by age. Surgical resection with a curative intent is the standard of care for patients with early stage melanoma.
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are the standard of care adjuvant treatment for high-risk resected melanoma. In the KEYNOTE-054 trial, the 5-year Relapse Free Survival (RFS) with adjuvant Pembrolizumab was 55.4% versus 38.3% with placebo. In the CHECKMATE-238 trial, the 4-year RFS rate was of 51.7% for Nivolumab versus 41.2% for ipilimumab. Given the high relapse rates with the present adjuvant melanoma therapies, there is an unmet clinical need.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

mRNA-4157 (V940) is a novel messenger RiboNucleic Acid (mRNA)-based individualized neoantigen therapy consisting of a single synthetic mRNA coding for up to 34 neoantigens, that is designed and produced based on the unique mutational signature of the DNA sequence of the patients tumor. Individualized neoantigen therapies are designed to prime the immune system so that a patient can generate a tailored antitumor response specific to their tumor mutation signature. mRNA-4157 (V940) was designed to stimulate an immune response by generating specific T cell responses based on the unique mutational signature of a patient’s tumor. Early clinical studies demonstrated that combining mRNA-4157 (V940) with Pembrolizumab may potentially provide an additive benefit and enhance T cell-mediated destruction of tumor cells.

KEYNOTE-942 is a randomized Phase IIb trial, which assessed the efficacy of mRNA-4157/V940 in prolonging RFS in patients with resected, Stages IIIB/IIIC/IIID and IV melanoma, when given in combination with Pembrolizumab, the standard of care adjuvant therapy in this patient population. This study included 157 patients who were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive mRNA-4157/V940 in combination with Pembrolizumab (107 patients) or Pembrolizumab alone (50 patients). The vaccine was administered every three weeks for a total of nine doses, and Pembrolizumab was given at 200 mg IV every three weeks for up to 18 cycles (approximately one year). All patients had tumor sample (Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded-FFPE) available for Next Generation Sequencing and patients were stratified by disease stage. mRNA-4157/V940 was successfully prepared for more than 99% of patients in the combination arm. The median patient age was 62 years and 84% of patient had Stage IIIC disease. Approximately 64% of patients were PD-L1 positive and 74% had high Tumor Mutational Burden-TMB (10 or more mutations/Mb) in the combination treatment group, and 54% were PD-L1 positive and 60% had high TMB in the single agent Pembrolizumab group, respectively. The Primary endpoint was Relapse Free Survival (RFS), defined as the time from first dose of Pembrolizumab until the date of first recurrence (local, regional, or distant metastasis), a new primary melanoma, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included distant Metastasis-Free Survival and Safety. Exploratory endpoints included distribution of TMB expression in baseline tumor samples across study arms and their association with the primary RFS endpoint. The median follow up was 23 months for the mRNA-4157/V940 plus Pembrolizumab group and 24 months for Pembrolizumab alone group.

The Relapse Free Survival at 18 months was 78.6% for the immunotherapy combination versus 62.2% for Pembrolizumab alone (HR=0.56; P=0.0266), and this equated to a 44% reduction in the risk of recurrence or death with 2 years of follow up. mRNA-4157/V940 and Pembrolizumab combination treatment demonstrated an improvement in RFS, irrespective of PD-L1 status and TMB status. The immunotherapy combination was well tolerated without increased Grade 3-4 immune mediated or serious toxicities. The most common adverse events of any grade attributed to the combination immunotherapy were fatigue, injection site pain and chills.

The researchers concluded that this is the first randomized trial to demonstrate Relapse Free Survival improvement with an individualized neoantigen approach, compared to standard of care treatment with Pembrolizumab, among patients with high-risk resected melanoma.

A personalized cancer vaccine, mRNA-4157, combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: Efficacy and safety results from the randomized, open-label Phase 2 mRNA-4157-P201/Keynote-942 trial. Khattak A, Carlino M, Meniawy T, et al. Presented at: 2023 AACR Annual Meeting; April 14-19, 2023; Orlando, FL. Abstract CT001.

Zolbetuximab Plus Chemotherapy Improves Survival in CLDN18.2 Positive Metastatic Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the US about 26,500 new gastric cancer cases will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 11,130 people will die of the disease. It is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world. Several hereditary syndromes such as Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC), Lynch syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer) and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) have been associated with a predisposition for Gastric cancer. Additionally, one of the strongest risk factor for Gastric adenocarcinoma is infection with Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), which is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped microaerophilic bacterium.
Patients with localized disease (Stage II and Stage III) are often treated with multimodality therapy and 40% of the patients may survive for 5 years or more. However, majority of the patients with Gastric and GastroEsophageal junction Adenocarcinoma have advanced disease at the time of initial presentation and have limited therapeutic options with little or no chance for cure. The five-year relative survival rate for patients at the metastatic stage is approximately 6%.

These patients frequently are treated with platinum containing chemotherapy along with a Fluoropyrimidine such as modified FOLFOX6. Patients with HER2-positive disease are usually treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, and for those patients with HER2-negative disease, patients receive chemotherapy along with a checkpoint inhibitor or checkpoint inhibitor alone if the tumors express PD-L1.

Zolbetuximab is a first-in-class chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets and binds to CLDN18.2, a transmembrane protein. CLDN18.2 protein found in normal gastric cells, and is a major component of epithelial and endothelial tight junctions controlling the flow of molecules between cells. Pre-clinical studies have shown that CLDN18.2 expression which can also be present in gastric tumors, increases as cancer progresses, and may become more exposed and accessible to targeted therapies with antibodies as gastric tumors develop. The binding interaction of Zolbetuximab to CLDN18.2 activates Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) and Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) resulting in cancer cell death. About 30-40% of patients with gastric cancer have CLDN18.2 expression.

SPOTLIGHT trial is a Phase III, global, multi-center, double-blind, randomized study, in which the efficacy and safety of Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 was compared with placebo plus mFOLFOX6, as first-line treatment of patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2- negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic Gastric or GastroEsophageal Junction cancer. In this study, 565 enrolled patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive the combination of Zolbetuximab and mFOLFOX6 (N=283) or placebo and mFOLFOX6 (N=282). Zolbetuximab was given at 800 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of cycle 1 followed by 600 mg/m2 on day 22 of cycle 1, and days 1 and 22 of subsequent cycles, every 3 weeks. mFOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin) was given IV every 2 weeks in cycles 1 to 4 of 42-day cycles. For cycles 5 and beyond, Zolbetuximab was given at the same dosing schedule in combination with 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV every 2 weeks. Those in the placebo arm were given placebo at the every 3-week schedule and chemotherapy was administered at the same dosing schedule. Treatment was continued until disease progression or discontinuation criteria were met. Enrolled patients had moderate-to-strong CLDN18 staining intensity in at least 75% of tumor cells based on a validated ImmunoHistoChemistry assay, had HER2-negative disease, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were stratified by region (Asian versus non-Asian), number of organs with metastases (0-2 versus 3 or more), and prior gastrectomy. The median age was 61 years and 31.4% of patients were from Asia. Majority of patients had 0-2 organs with metastases, 30% had prior gastrectomy. Approximately 13% of patients had tumors with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 5. The primary disease site was stomach in 76% of patients and was GastroEsophageal Junction in 24%. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), and Safety.

This study met the Primary endpoint and the median PFS was 10.61 months with the Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 combination versus 8.67 months with placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (HR=0.75; P=0.0066) and this was statistically significant. The OS was also significantly improved (18.23 versus 15.54 months, HR=0.750; P=0.0053), making this one of the longest durations of median OS seen in Phase III trials for this patient population. The most common Adverse Events with Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 were nausea, vomiting and decreased appetite. The incidences of serious Adverse Events were similar between the two treatment groups.

The authors concluded that Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 is a new potential Standard-of-Care treatment for a biomarker-based subgroup of patients with CLDN18.2-positive/HER2-negative locally advanced unresectable or metastatic Gastric/GE Junction adenocarcinoma. It is unclear if this regimen is superior to chemotherapy plus a checkpoint inhibitor in patients with PD-L1–positive and CLDN18.2-positive disease.

Zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 as first-line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) withclaudin-18.2+ (CLDN18.2+) / HER2− locally advanced (LA) unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma: Primary results from phase 3 SPOTLIGHT study. Shitara K, Lordick F, Bang Y-J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(suppl; abstr LBA292). doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.3_suppl.LBA292

Capivasertib Plus Fulvestrant Improves Progression Free Survival in Advanced Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S.

About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. The most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer is HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (65% of all metastatic breast tumors), and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 36 months. With the development of Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay, for the management of HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, as first line therapy. Even with this therapeutic combination, most patients will eventually experience disease progression due to resistance to endocrine therapy. Therapies overcoming this resistance is an area of active research in the breast cancer space.

Capivasertib is a novel pyrrolopyrimidine derivative, and is first-in-class orally available inhibitor of the serine/threonine protein kinase AKT (protein kinase B), with potential antineoplastic activity. It is a potent, selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of all three AKT isoforms (AKT1/2/3). Inhibition of AKT prevents the phosphorylation of AKT substrates that mediate cellular processes, such as cell division, apoptosis, and glucose and fatty acid metabolism. A wide range of solid and hematological malignancies show dysregulated PI3K/AKT/mTOR/PTEN signaling due to mutations in the genes involved. By targeting AKT, the key node in the PIK3/AKT signaling network, Capivasertib potentially may be used as monotherapy or combination therapy for a variety of human cancers. The researchers conducted the CAPItello-291 trial to determine whether the addition of Capivasertib to Fulvestrant would improve outcomes in patients with HR-positive breast cancer whose tumors had developed resistance to an Aromatase Inhibitor.

CAPItello-291 is a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in which 708 adult patients with histologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-low or negative breast cancer, whose disease has recurred or progressed during or after Aromatase Inhibitor therapy, with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant (N=355) arm or the placebo plus Fulvestrant arm (N=353). Patients in the study group received Capivasertib 400 mg orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off along with Fulvestrant 500 mg IM on days 1 and 15 during cycle 1, then every 4 weeks thereafter. The present dosing of Capivasertib was chosen based on tolerability and the degree of target inhibition in early phase trials. The control group received matched placebo along with Fulvestrant. In this trial, patients could have received up to one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease and approximately 40% of tumors had PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations. Both treatment groups were well balanced. Stratification factors included liver metastases and prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the overall patient population and in a subgroup of patients whose tumors have qualifying alterations in the PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN genes. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR).

The trial met both Primary endpoints, improving PFS in the overall patient population and in a prespecified biomarker subgroup of patients whose tumors had qualifying alterations in the AKT pathway genes. In the overall trial population, patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant had a median PFS of 7.2 months, compared to 3.6 months in patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant (HR=0.60; P<0.001). This amounted to a 40% lower risk of disease progression among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant.

Among patients with AKT pathway mutations treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant, the median PFS was 7.3 months versus 3.1 months in the placebo group (HR=0.50; P<0.001), reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 50%, versus placebo plus Fulvestrant. In the group without qualifying alterations in the AKT pathway genes, the PFS was 7.2 months in the Capivasertib group versus 3.7 months in the placebo group (HR=0.70). The benefit from Capivasertib was consistent across key clinically relevant subgroups, including patients previously treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and patients with liver metastases.

The Objective Response Rate in the overall trial population was 22.9% among patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant compared with 12.2% for patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant and was 28.8% and 9.7% respectively in the biomarker altered population. Although the Overall Survival data were immature at the time of the analysis, early data are encouraging and follow up is ongoing.

The most frequent Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurring in 5% or more of patients were diarrhea (9.3%) and rash (12.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 13% among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant versus 2.3% among patients who received placebo plus Fulvestrant.

It was concluded that a combination of Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant is a new treatment option with significantly improved Progression Free Survival, in patients who have Hormone Receptor–positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who had progressed on, or become resistant to, endocrine therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the Phase III CAPItello-291 trial. Turner N, Oliveria M, Howell SJ, et al. Presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS3-04.

BRUKINSA® Superior to IMBRUVICA® in Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 20,160 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4410 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children.

Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. Ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA®) is an oral, irreversible inhibitor of BTK and inhibits cell proliferation and promotes programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling. IMBRUVICA® demonstrated survival benefits, when compared to chemoimmunotherapy, both in previously untreated (RESONATE-2), as well as relapsed (RESONATE) CLL patients. However, toxicities leading to IMBRUVICA® discontinuation occurred in a significant number of patients, and Atrial Fibrillation was noted in 11-16% of patients and hypertension rates were between 20-26%.

Zanubrutinib (BRUKINSA®) is an irreversible, potent, next-generation, small molecule inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase, designed to deliver targeted and sustained inhibition of the BTK protein by optimizing bioavailability, half-life, and selectivity, while minimizing off-target inhibition of TEC- and EGFR-family kinases. It has been hypothesized that the increased selectivity of BRUKINSA® may minimize toxicities, (such as those often associated with IMBRUVICA®) and improve efficacy outcomes. BRUKINSA® demonstrated promising efficacy among patients with CLL/SLL (Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma), in early phase trials.

ALPINE study is a randomized, global, Phase III trial in which BRUKINSA® was compared with IMBRUVICA® in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL. In this trial, a total of 652 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either BRUKINSA® 160 mg orally twice daily or IMBRUVICA® 420 mg orally once daily, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Enrolled patients had at least one prior systemic therapy and were required to have measurable lymphadenopathy by CT scan or MRI. Exclusion criteria included current or past Richter’s transformation and prior treatment with BTK inhibitors. The median age was 67 years, 45% of the patients had bulky disease with a tumor that was 5 cm or more in the greatest dimension, 73% had unmutated IGHV status, and 23% had a chromosome 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, or both and fewer than 15% of patients were on anticoagulants. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 1 and a total of 80% of the patients in the BRUKINSA® group and 76% of those in the IMBRUVICA® group had previously received chemoimmunotherapy. The Primary end point of the trial was Overall Response Rate (ORR) assessed by investigator and Independent Review Committee (IRC), and Secondary end points included Progression Free Survival (PFS), event rate of Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter, Duration of Response, Time to Treatment Failure, Overall Survival (OS), Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Safety.

A prespecified interim analysis showed that BRUKINSA® was superior to IMBRUVICA®, with respect to Overall Response Rate. The authors in this final analysis reported the clinical outcomes of Progression Free Survival, a key Secondary endpoint. Progression Free Survival was assessed with the use of a hierarchical testing strategy to determine whether BRUKINSA® was noninferior to IMBRUVICA®. If noninferiority was established, the superiority of BRUKINSA® was assessed and claimed if the two-sided P value was less than 0.05.

At a median follow up of 29.6 months, BRUKINSA® was found to be superior to IMBRUVICA® with respect to Progression Free Survival, as assessed by the investigators and Independent Review Committee (HR=0.65; P=0.002). The PFS at 24 months was 78.4% in the BRUKINSA® group and 65.9% in the IMBRUVICA® group. Median PFS was not reached in the BRUKINSA® group and was 34.2 months in the IMBRUVICA® group.

Among patients with a 17p deletion, a TP53 mutation, or both, those who received BRUKINSA® had longer PFS than those who received IMBRUVICA® (HR=0.53). The percentage of patients who were alive without disease progression at 24 months in this high-risk population was 72.6% in the BRUKINSA® group, and 54.6% in the IMBRUVICA® group. The PFS benefit was in favor of BRUKINSA® across major prespecified subgroups, including age, previous lines of therapy, disease stage, and IGHV mutational status.

Consistent with the findings at the interim analysis, the Overall Response Rate was higher in the BRUKINSA® group than in the IMBRUVICA® group, and were 86.2% and 75.7%, respectively, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee.

BRUKINSA® had a more favorable safety profile, with a lower incidence of cardiac disorders (21.3%), than in the IMBRUVICA® group (29.6%). Cardiac events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 0.3% of patients in the BRUKINSA® group and in 4.3% of patients in the IMBRUVICA® group. The incidence of Atrial fibrillation or flutter of any grade, a key Secondary endpoint, was lower in the BRUKINSA® group than in the IMBRUVICA® group (5.2% versus 13.3%).

It was concluded that in patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, treatment with BRUKINSA® resulted in a significantly longer Progression Free Survival, compared to those patients who received IMBRUVICA®, and BRUKINSA® was associated with fewer cardiac adverse events.

Zanubrutinib or Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Brown JR, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:319-332.

NALIRIFOX Improves Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2022, about 62,210 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 49,830 people will die of the disease. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and Western Europe. Unfortunately, unlike other malignancies, very little progress has been made and outcome for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been dismal, with a 5-year survival rate for metastatic pancreatic cancer of approximately 10%. Pancreatic cancer has surpassed breast cancer as the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is on track to surpass colorectal cancer, to move to the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States. Majority of patients with pancreatic cancer (80% of cases) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and are not amenable to curative surgical resection, at the time of diagnosis. The current treatment regimens for advanced disease have proved ineffective, conferring a median Overall Survival (OS) of 6-8 months.

ONIVYDE® is a novel nanoliposomal encapsulation of Irinotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor. It is designed to optimize the delivery of Irinotecan, by extending the duration of circulation of the drug in the body and preferentially activating the drug within the tumor tissues, to achieve higher levels of the active cytotoxic drug metabolite, SN-38. This approach reduces the toxicity of Irinotecan to normal tissues while maintaining or increasing its anti-tumor efficacy.

In the NAPOLI-1 open-label Phase III study, a combination of ONIVYDE®, 5-FU and Leucovorin improved Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, CA19-9 response and Disease Control Rate following Gemcitabine-based therapy, in patients with metastatic Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. ONIVYDE® in combination with Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin was approved for this indication in 2015. In a Phase I/II study, ONIVYDE® in combination with 5-FU, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

NAPOLI 3 is a global, randomized, open-label Phase III trial which tested the safety and efficacy of NALIRIFOX regimen in treatment naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In this study, 770 patients with histopathologically/cytologically confirmed untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive NALIRIFOX (N=383) or Gemcitabine plus nab-Paclitaxel (N=387). The NALIRIFOX regimen consisted of ONIVYDE® 50 mg/m2 IV, given along with 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV, Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV and Oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in the Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel group received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV along with nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 IV, on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Both treatment groups were well balanced with similar baseline characteristics, including median age of 64.5 years and number of metastatic sites (three or greater in 37% of patients). Patients were stratified by ECOG performance status, geographic region, and presence or absence of liver metastases. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS) and Secondary endpoints included were Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Safety.

At a median follow-up of 16.1 months, the median OS was 11.1 months in the NALIRIFOX group versus 9.2 months in the Gemcitabine plus nab-Paclitaxel arm (HR=0.84; P=0.04). There was also a significant improvement in the PFS at 7.4 months versus 5.6 months respectively (HR=0.70; P=0.0001). This OS and PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. The NALIRIFOX group also had a higher Objective Response Rate at 41.8% versus 36.2% for patients treated with Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel group, and a lower percentage of patients who received NALIRIFOX went on to receive subsequent anticancer therapy (50.5% versus 54.4%). Treatment related toxicities associated with NALIRIFOX regimen were manageable and consistent with the drug profiles in this regimen.

It was concluded that first line treatment with NALIRIFOX regimen demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival, compared with Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel, in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

NAPOLI-3: A randomized, open-label phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) versus nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Wainberg ZA, Melisi D, Macarulla T, et al. Presented at: ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; Jan. 19-21, 2023; San Francisco. Abstract LBA661.

Long Term Overall Survival Benefit with VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® in Elderly AML Patients

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2023, 20,380 new cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) will be diagnosed in the United States and 11,310 patients will die of the disease. AML is one of the most common types of leukemia in adults and can be considered as a group of molecularly heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior and outcomes. A significant percentage of patients with newly diagnosed AML are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy or have disease that is refractory to standard chemotherapy. Even with the best available therapies, the 5-year Overall Survival in patients 65 years of age or older is less than 5%. Cytogenetic analysis has been part of routine evaluation when caring for patients with AML. By predicting resistance to therapy, tumor cytogenetics will stratify patients based on risk, and help manage them accordingly. Even though cytotoxic chemotherapy may lead to long term remission and cure in a minority of patients with favorable cytogenetics, patients with high-risk features such as unfavorable cytogenetics, molecular abnormalities, prior myelodysplasia, and advanced age, have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy alone. More importantly, with the understanding of molecular pathology of AML, personalized and targeted therapies are becoming an important part of the AML treatment armamentarium.

The pro-survival (anti-apoptotic) protein BCL2 is over expressed by AML cells and regulates clonal selection and cell survival. A new class of anticancer agents known as BH3-mimetic drugs mimic the activity of the physiologic antagonists of BCL2 and related proteins and promote apoptosis (programmed cell death). VENCLEXTA® (Venetoclax) is a second generation, oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of BCL2 and restores the apoptotic processes in tumor cells. VIDAZA® (Azacitidine) is a hypomethylating agent that promotes DNA hypomethylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases. VIDAZA® has been shown to significantly improve Overall Survival (OS), when compared to conventional care regimens, in elderly unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. The combination of VIDAZA® and VENCLEXTA® in a previously published Phase Ib study was highly efficacious, with significant responses, duration of response and Overall Survival benefit.

VIALE-A is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled confirmatory trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of VIDAZA® and VENCLEXTA®, as compared with VIDAZA® plus placebo (the control regimen), in previously untreated patients with AML, who were ineligible for intensive induction therapy. In this study, 431 patients (N=431) with previously untreated AML were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® (N=286), or VIDAZA® plus placebo (N=145). Enrolled patients were ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy because of coexisting conditions, 75 years of age or older, or both. All patients received VIDAZA® 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or IV on days 1 through 7 of every 28-day cycle. Patients in the study group also received VENCLEXTA® 100 mg orally on day 1 and 200 mg on day 2 and target dose of 400 mg on day 3, and continued daily until day 28 during cycle 1, to mitigate Tumor Lysis Syndrome. The dose of VENCLEXTA® was initiated at 400 mg daily in all subsequent 28-day cycles. In the control group, a matching placebo was administered orally, once daily, in 28-day cycles. The median age was 76 years in both groups, approximately 60% were male and 76% were Caucasian. Molecular abnormalities of interest included FLT-3, observed in 14% of patients receiving VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA®, IDH1/2, observed in 25% of patients, TP53, observed in 23.3% of patients and NPM1, observed in 16.6% of patients. Secondary AML was reported in 25% of the patients in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and in 24% of the patients in the control group. All the patients were hospitalized on or before day 1 of cycle 1 and for at least 24 hours after receiving the final dose of VENCLEXTA®, in order to receive prophylaxis against the Tumor Lysis Syndrome and for monitoring. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). The Secondary end points included Complete Remission (CR) rates, composite Complete Remission (Complete Remission or Complete Remission with incomplete hematologic recovery), RBC and platelet transfusion independence, and Quality of Life according to Patient-Reported Outcomes.

At a median follow up of 20.5 months, the median OS was 14.7 months in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group versus 9.6 months in the VIDAZA® plus placebo group (HR=0.66; P<0.001). VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® combination resulted in a CR rate of 36.7% versus 17.9%; P<0.001 and composite CR of 66.4% versus 28.3%; P<0.001, when compared to the control regimen. Most responses were seen after the first 28-day cycle. The median time to first response was 1.3 versus and 2.8 months respectively, duration of CR was 17.5 months versus 13.3 months and median duration of composite CR was 17.5 months in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and 13.4 months in the control group. RBC transfusion independence occurred in 59.8% of the patients in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and in 35.2% of those in the control group (P<0.001), and platelet transfusion independence occurred in 68.5% and 49.7% (P<0.001), respectively. The benefits with VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® were noted in almost all molecular subgroups compared to the control regimen. The response rates were highest among patients with FLT3 mutations (72.4% versus 36.4%, P=0.02) and those with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations (75.4 % versus 10.7%, P<0.001), respectively.

The researchers conducted 2 years of additional follow-up to determine the long-term survival benefit of VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® combination and at this meeting reported the analysis of VIALE-A trial, after the occurrence of 100% of the pre-planned survival events. With a median follow-up of 43.2 months, the median Overall Survival (OS) benefit since the interim analysis in the overall population was maintained and was 14.7 months in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group versus 9.6 months in the VIDAZA® plus placebo group (HR=0.58; P<0.001). Among patients with Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) <10-3 who had achieved either Complete Remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), the median OS was reached at 34.2 months in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and 25.0 months in the control group. For patients in the IDH1/2 mutant subgroup, the median OS at final analysis with VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® was 19.9 months and was 6.2 months in the control group (HR=0.31; P<0.001). Overall safety profiles were comparable between the treatment groups.

The 2-year follow up analysis of the VIALE-A trial confirmed the sustained Overall Survival benefit of VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® combination in patients with AML, ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, with no new safety findings noted.

Long-Term Follow-up of the Phase 3 Viale-a Clinical Trial of Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine for Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy. Pratz KW, Jonas BA, Pullarkat VA, et al. Presented at the 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 10-13, 2022, New Orleans, Louisiana. Abstract # 219

TAILORx Long Term Update for Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence.

Approximately 50% of all breast cancers are Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative tumors. Patients with early-stage breast cancer often receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The Oncotype DX breast cancer assay, is a multigene genomic test that analyzes the activity of a group of 21 genes and is able to predict the risk of breast cancer recurrence and likelihood of benefit from systemic chemotherapy, following surgery, in women with early-stage breast cancer. Chemotherapy recommendations for Hormone Receptor positive, HER negative, early-stage breast cancer patients, are often made based on tumor size, grade, ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) markers such as Ki-67, nodal status and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) assay. Oncotype Dx assay categorizes patients based on Recurrence Scores into Low risk (0-10), Intermediate risk (11-25), and High risk (26-100). It has been unclear whether patients in the Intermediate risk group benefited from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. TAILORx was specifically designed to address this question and provide a very definitive answer.

TAILORx ((Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment) is a phase III, randomized, prospective, non-inferiority trial, and is the largest breast cancer treatment trial ever conducted, and the first precision medicine trial ever done, according to the authors. In this study, 10,273 women, 18-75 years of age, with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, T1b-T2N0 early-stage axillary node-negative breast cancer were enrolled. Patients had tumors 1.1-5.0 cm in size (or 0.6-1.0 cm and intermediate/high grade). Patients were divided into three groups based on their Recurrence Score. Women with a Low Recurrence Score of 0-10 received endocrine therapy alone and those with a High Recurrence Score of 26-100 received endocrine therapy in combination with standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient with Intermediate Recurrence Score of 11-25 (N=6711) were randomly assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone (N=3399) or endocrine therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (N=3312). The Primary endpoint was invasive Disease-Free Survival, defined as recurrence of cancer in the breast, regional lymph nodes, and/or distant organs, a second primary cancer in the opposite breast or another organ, or death from any cause. The researchers conducted an updated analysis, in which patients were followed for an additional 3.5 years, for an average of 11 years. The Primary endpoint in the updated analysis was invasive Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at a median follow-up of 11.0 years in the randomized population and 10.4 years in the overall population.

The previous TAILORx study conclusions remain unchanged. Among patients with a Recurrence Score of 11-25, endocrine therapy alone was non-inferior to chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy. The 5-year invasive DFS with endocrine therapy alone was 92.8% versus 93.1% with chemotherapy plus endocrine (HR=1.08; P=0.26). The 12-year invasive DFS with endocrine therapy alone was 76.8% versus 77.4% with chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (HR =1.08). Although among those patients with a Recurrence Score of 0-25, less than 10% of patients had disease recurrence by 12 years, late recurrence events beyond 5 years exceeded earlier recurrence, regardless of treatment. There was also a higher risk of early recurrence in Black women.

It was concluded that with longer follow-up, the main TAILORx study findings remain unchanged, and clinicians should continue to use the 21-gene recurrence score results to guide decisions about the use of chemotherapy.

Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx): An update including 12-year event rates. Sparano J, Gray RJ, Makower D, et al. Presented at SABCS 2022. December 6-10, 2022. Abstract GS1-05.

Sequential Conditioning and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation WITHOUT Prior Remission-Induction Chemotherapy in AML

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 20,380 new cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) will be diagnosed in the United States and 11,310 patients will die of the disease. AML can be considered as a group of heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior and outcomes. Cytogenetic analysis has been part of routine evaluation when caring for patients with AML. By predicting resistance to therapy, tumor cytogenetics will stratify patients, based on risk, and help manage them accordingly. Even though cytotoxic chemotherapy may lead to long term remission and cure in a minority of patients with favorable cytogenetics, patients with high-risk features such as unfavorable cytogenetics, molecular abnormalities, prior Myelodysplasia and advanced age, have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy alone.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for AML often consists of induction therapy to achieve remission, followed by consolidation therapy. However, standard induction chemotherapy achieves Complete Remission in only 40-60% of AML patients older than 60 years of age, and majority of these patients will eventually relapse. This had been attributed to clonal evolution and epigenetic reprogramming, leading to aberrant DNA methylation, and persistence of leukemia-initiating cells. Patients with AML who are under age 55 with high-risk cytogenetics in first clinical remission, are considered for allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, as this has shown to offer survival advantage over conventional chemotherapy. Patients receive salvage chemotherapy, targeted therapy for FLT3-mutant and susceptible IDH mutant AML, or treatment with a BCL2 inhibitor and hypomethylating agent, if a donor is not readily available and a prolonged donor search is needed.

ASAP is a randomized Phase III trial, conducted in patients with an unfavorable risk AML who either had a poor response to first induction therapy or had a relapse after first induction therapy. This study enrolled AML patients with poor response after first induction therapy or relapsed AML, who were eligible for intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with either a matched sibling donor, an HLA-compatible (9 or more/10) unrelated donor, or ongoing donor search with two potential unrelated donors with 90% or more HLA-matching probability. This analysis included 276 patients, of whom 272 patients were treated per protocol. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a Remission Induction arm in which patients received Cytarabine 3 g/m2 IV (1 g/m2 for patients more than 60 years) twice daily on days 1-3 plus Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 IV on days 3-5 and subsequent allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (Remission Induction Strategy arm-N=134) or to Disease Control arm (DISC arm-N=138) prior to sequential conditioning and allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Disease Control Strategy consisted primarily of watchful waiting, but low-dose Cytarabine and single doses of mitoxantrone were permitted for disease-control. The median age was 61 years and at randomization, 39 patients had matched sibling donor, 133 patients had an HLA-compatible unrelated donor with confirmed HLA-typing, and 104 patients had ongoing unrelated donor searches. The Primary endpoint was Disease Free Survival (DFS), defined as Complete Remission at day 56 after allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, although the statistical goal of the study was to show non-inferiority of the Disease Control arm. Major secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS) from randomization and Leukemia-Free Survival from Complete Remission at day 56. The median time to allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation was 8 weeks in the Remission Induction Strategy arm and 4 weeks in the Disease Control arm. At 24 weeks from randomization 96% and 94% of patients had been transplanted in the Remission Induction Strategy arm and Disease Control arm, respectively.

The Primary endpoint was met with the Disease Control arm, which is the less intensive treatment strategy, meeting the Primary endpoint of DFS/Complete Remission at day 56 after allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. The Disease-Free Survival at day 56 was 81.3% in the Remission Induction Strategy arm and 84.1% in the Disease Control arm (P for noninferiority=0.047). Among patients who met the Primary endpoint, after a median follow-up from randomization of 37 months, there was no significant difference in the Leukemia-Free Survival or Overall Survival from day 56, in the Remission Induction Strategy arm and Disease Control arm. The Disease Control Strategy was also associated with significantly fewer Grade 3 or more adverse events, compared to the Remission Induction Strategy (23% versus 64%, P<0.001), and fewer mean number of days in hospital prior to transplant (19 versus 42 days, P<0.001).

The researchers concluded from this first randomized controlled trial that intensive remission induction chemotherapy prior to allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for patients with Relapsed/Refractory AML DID NOT result in a higher overall success rate and did not confer a survival advantage. It was noted that watchful waiting followed by sequential conditioning and allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation resulted in comparable overall Complete Remission rates and survival. The researchers added that the data from this study support sequential conditioning and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, without prior remission-induction chemotherapy, whenever a donor is readily available. Further, the results of this study emphasize the importance of allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in patients with Relapsed/Refractory AML and stress the need for starting donor search at diagnosis.

In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory AML Sequential Conditioning and Immediate Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HCT) Results in Similar Overall and Leukemia-Free Survival Compared to Intensive Remission Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Allo-HCT: Results from the Randomized Phase III ASAP Trial. Stelljes M, Middeke JM, Bug G, et al. 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition December 10th-13,2022. Abstract#4.

Sustained Benefit with Adjuvant VERZENIO® in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 290,560 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and about 43,780 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. Majority of these patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and are often cured with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However approximately 20% of patients will experience local recurrence or distant relapse during the first 10 years of treatment. This may be more relevant for those with high risk disease, among whom the risk of recurrence is even greater during the first 2 years, while on adjuvant endocrine therapy, due to primary endocrine resistance. More than 75% of the early recurrences are seen at distant sites.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDKs) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. CDK 4 and 6 phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity. Phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in HR-positive breast cancer, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation. The understanding of the role of CDKs in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.

VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib) is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase activity, and prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein, thereby inducing G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell proliferation. VERZENIO® is structurally distinct from other CDK 4 and 6 inhibitors (such as Ribociclib and Palbociclib) and is 14 times more potent against Cyclin D1/CDK 4 and Cyclin D3/CDK 6, in enzymatic assays, but potentially less toxic than earlier pan-CDK inhibitors. At higher doses, only VERZENIO® causes significant cancer cell death, compared with other CDK4/6 inhibitors, suggesting that this drug may be affecting proteins, other than CDK4/6. Additionally, preclinical studies have demonstrated that VERZENIO® may have additional therapeutic benefits for a subset of tumors that are unresponsive to treatment or have grown resistant to other CDK4/6 inhibitors. It has also been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier.

The International monarchE trial, is an open-label, randomized, Phase III study, which included 5637 patients, who were pre- and postmenopausal, with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer, and with clinical and/or pathologic risk factors that rendered them at high risk for relapse. The goal of monarchE was to evaluate the additional benefit of adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting, for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, high risk, early breast cancer. The researchers defined high risk as the presence of four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 three positive axillary lymph nodes, with either a tumor size of 5 cm or more, or histologic Grade 3 disease (Cohort 1). A smaller group of patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes and centrally determined Ki-67 score of 20% or more were enrolled in Cohort 2. Ki-67 score was also determined centrally in Cohort 1 patients, but Ki-67 determination was not required for enrollment in this cohort. Following completion of primary therapy which included both adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to VERZENIO® 150 mg orally twice daily for 2 years plus 5-10 years of physician’s choice of endocrine therapy as clinically indicated (N=2808), or endocrine therapy alone (N=2829). The median patient age was 51 years, about 43% of the patients were premenopausal, and 95% of patients had prior chemotherapy. Approximately 60% of patients had 4 or more positive lymph nodes. The Primary endpoint was Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population (Cohorts 1 and 2). Secondary end points included IDFS in patients with high Ki-67 score (in the ITT population and in the Cohort 1 population), Distant Relapse-Free Survival (DRFS), Overall Survival (OS), and Safety. The researchers reported updated results from an interim analysis to assess overall survival, as well as Invasive Disease-Free Survival and Distant Relapse-Free Survival, with additional follow-up.

At a median follow-up of 42 months (3.5 years), the median Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) was not reached in either group, and the IDFS benefit previously reported was sustained. The risk of developing invasive disease was reduced by 33.6% (HR=0.664; nominal P<0.0001). The 4-year IDFS rate was 85.8% for patients treated with VERZENIO® plus endocrine therapy, compared to 79.4% for patients treated with endocrine therapy alone, reflecting an absolute difference of 6.4% (compared to 2.8% at two years). The majority of the IDFS events were distant metastatic disease. Adjuvant VERZENIO® also reduced the risk of developing metastatic disease by 34.1% (HR=0.659; nominal P<0.0001). The 4-year DRFS rate was 88.4% for patients treated with VERZENIO® plus endocrine therapy, compared to 82.5% for patients treated with endocrine therapy alone, an absolute difference of 5.9% (compared to 2.5% at two years). As was noted in the previous analyses, a high Ki-67 score correlated with increased risk of recurrence, but this IDFS and DRFS benefit was seen across all prespecified subgroups, regardless of Ki-67 score. Overall Survival (OS) data were immature at the time of this analyses. However, fewer deaths were observed in the VERZENIO® plus endocrine therapy group, compared to endocrine therapy alone. There were no new safety findings, and overall results were consistent with the safety profile for VERZENIO®.

It was concluded that adjuvant VERZENIO® combined with endocrine therapy continued to demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in Invasive Disease Free Survival and Distant Relapse Free Survival, among patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high risk, early breast cancer, regardless of Ki-67 status. These benefits were sustained after patients completed 2 years of adjuvant treatment with VERZENIO®, with an absolute increase at 4 years. The authors added that further follow-up is needed to establish whether Overall Survival can be improved with VERZENIO® plus endocrine therapy in this patient group.

Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Johnston SRD, Toi M, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. The Lancet Oncology. Published:December 06, 2022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00694-5