Tag: Breast Cancer

Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. About 268,600 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2019 and about 41,760 women will die of the disease. Approximately 50% of all breast cancers are Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative tumors. Patients with early stage breast cancer often receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The Oncotype DX breast cancer assay, is a multigene genomic test that analyzes the activity of a group of 21 genes and is able to predict the risk of breast cancer recurrence and likelihood of benefit from systemic chemotherapy, following surgery, in women with early stage breast cancer. Chemotherapy recommendations for Hormone Receptor positive, HER negative, early stage breast cancer patients, are often made based on tumor size, grade, ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) markers such as Ki-67, nodal status and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) assay.

Oncotype Dx assay categorizes patients on the basis of Recurrence Scores into Low risk (less than 18), Intermediate risk (18-30), and High risk (31 or more). It has been unclear whether patients in the Intermediate risk group benefited from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. TAILORx was specifically designed to address this question and provide a very definitive answer. In this study, the Intermediate risk Recurrent Score (18-30) was changed to 11-25, to account for exclusion of higher-risk patients with HER2-positive disease and to minimize the potential for under treatment.

TAILORx ((Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment) is a phase III, randomized, prospective, non-inferiority trial, and is the largest breast cancer treatment trial ever conducted, and the first precision medicine trial ever done, according to the authors. In this study, 10,273 women, 18-75 years of age, with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer were enrolled. Patients had tumors 1.1-5.0 cm in size (or 0.6-1.0 cm and intermediate/high grade). Patients were divided into three groups based on their Recurrence Score. Women with a Low Recurrence Score of 0-10 received endocrine therapy alone and those with a High Recurrence Score of 26-100 received endocrine therapy in combination with standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient with Intermediate Recurrence Score of 11-25 (N=6711) were randomly assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone or endocrine therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were followed up for 9 years. The Primary endpoint was invasive Disease Free Survival, defined as recurrence of cancer in the breast, regional lymph nodes, and/or distant organs, a second primary cancer in the opposite breast or another organ, or death from any cause. Results reported in June 2018 showed that while most women with an Intermediate Recurrence Score of 11-25 did not benefit from chemotherapy, women 50 years or younger with a Recurrence Score of 16-25 did indeed benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

The authors in this publication provided additional results from the same data set showing that adding “Clinical Risk” provides additional prognostic information. The investigators used a binary classification system from the MINDACT trial (Microarray in Node-Negative Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy), which used a 70-gene assay, and divided patients into high or low “Clinical Risk” based on tumor size and histologic grade. Clinical Risk was defined as low if the tumor was 3 cm or less in diameter and had a low histologic grade, 2 cm or less and had an intermediate histologic grade, or 1 cm or less in diameter and had a high grade. The Clinical Risk was defined as high if the low-risk criteria were not met. This additional reporting provided prognostic information about recurrent risk, but not benefits of chemotherapy particularly in the Intermediate Recurrence Score group.TAILORx-HR-Positive-HER-Negative-Early-Stage-Breast-Cancer

Among women who were 50 years of age or younger with a low Recurrence Score, the distant recurrence rate at 9 years was less than 5%, irrespective of Clinical Risk, and about 5% among those with an intermediate Recurrence Score with low Clinical Risk. However in sharp contrast, among women 50 years of age or younger, with high Clinical Risk and an intermediate Recurrence Score who had received endocrine therapy alone, the rate of distant recurrence at 9 years was 12.3%, compared with 6.1% among women who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. It is possible that younger women with a Recurrence Score of 11-25 and high Clinical Risk, receiving endocrine therapy alone, may have been undertreated with Tamoxifen, and the authors speculated that based on previously published studies, adding Ovarian Suppression and an Aromatase Inhibitor might result in risk reduction, equivalent to that observed using adjuvant chemotherapy.

The authors concluded that these new findings complement the original, definitive TAILORx conclusion and integration of genomic (Recurrence Score) and Clinical Risk may provide a more accurate estimate of prognosis for individual patients, than could be provided by either the genomic or clinical information alone. They added that this Clinical Risk stratification facilitates more refined estimates of absolute chemotherapy benefit for women 50 years of age or younger, with a Recurrence Score 16-25. Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Ravdin PM, et al. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2395-2405

Prognostic Value of Progesterone Receptor in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 268,600 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2019 and about 41,760 women will die of the disease. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors (ER) and/or Progesterone Receptors (PR) and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy.

It has been well established that the detection of Estrogen, Progesterone and HER-2 neu receptors on the tumor cell expressed either alone or together, is a significant prognostic factor, and is associated with the conditional gene expression in the tumor cell itself. The St. Gallen International Expert Consensus in 2011 classified breast cancer into five molecular subtypes with prognostic significance, based on these genetically determined expressions in the tumor cell. The five molecular subtypes of breast cancer include 1) Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER-2 negative, Ki-67 less than 14%) constituting about 26% of patients 2) Luminal B with HER-2 negative (ER+ and/or PR+, HER-2 negative, Ki-67 14% or more) constituting about 32% 3) Luminal B with HER-2 positive (ER+ and/or PR+, HER-2+, any Ki-67) constituting about 25% 4) HER-2 enriched (ER-, PR-, HER-2+) accounting for about 8% of patients 5) Basal-like (triple negative) (ER-, PR-, HER-2 negative, CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+) constituting about 9% of all breast cancer patients. According to the 2015 St. Gallen guidelines, adjuvant chemotherapy can avoided in Luminal A patients, whereas patients with ER+ HER-2 negative tumors with low or no PR expression or with high Ki-67 expression are considered to have a high risk of relapse and adjuvant chemotherapy is often recommended. It should be noted however that low PR expression in Luminal A patients can carry a poor prognosis as well.

The Progesterone Receptor (PR) is a member of the nuclear receptor family and is regulated by the Estrogen Receptor. It is expressed in over two-thirds of ER-positive breast cancers and is more highly expressed in the Luminal A breast cancer subtype. Several studies have demonstrated improved prognosis among PR-positive breast cancer patients. Further, in ER+, HER-2 negative breast cancers, the Progesterone Receptor is an independent prognostic marker. However, the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade has been unclear.

The authors hypothesized that patient with high-grade tumors might do well if PR is positive. The objective of this study therefore was to study the prognostic value of PR in tumors with high tumor proliferative index, using tumor grade as a surrogate for the proliferative activity of ER+, HER-2 negative breast cancer. This retrospective study included women with primary operable, invasive, ER+ HER-2 negative breast cancer, diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, treated at University Hospitals Leuven. The association of PR status and subtype (Grade 1-2 versus Grade 3) was assessed with Distant Recurrence Free Interval (DRFI) and Breast Cancer specific survival. The data set from BIG 1-98 trial was used for validation. A total of 4,228 patients from Leuven and 5,419 from BIG 1-98 were analyzed. The median patient age was 58 years, 73% had Luminal A-like subtype, 27% had Luminal B-like subtype, lymph node status was predominantly negative (62%) and PR was positive in 89% of patients. Median tumor size was 2.1 cm and most of the patients received adjuvant endocrine therapy (96%) and/or radiotherapy (87%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 29% of the patients. The median follow up period was 8.6 years.

It was noted in this study that PR positive tumors were more strongly associated with better prognosis in Luminal B-like than in Luminal A-like breast cancer, suggesting that PR is more prognostic in Luminal B-like versus Luminal A-like tumors. Among the Luminal B-like tumors, the 5-year cumulative incidences of distant recurrence were 18.7% in PR negative and 9.2% in PR positive tumors. 

It was concluded PR positivity may be more protective against metastatic relapse in Luminal B-like versus Luminal A-like breast cancer. An absent PR is a clinically more important negative prognostic factor in tumors with a high proliferative index than in low proliferative ER+ HER-2 negative breast tumors. Prognostic Value of the Progesterone Receptor by Subtype in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer. Van Astena K, Slembroucka L, Olbrecht S, et al. The Oncologist 2019;24:165-171

FDA Approves First PI3K Inhibitor, PIQRAY®, for Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on May 24, 2019 approved PIQRAY® (Alpelisib) in combination with FASLODEX® (Fulvestrant), to treat postmenopausal women and men, with Hormone Receptor (HR) positive, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) negative, PIK3CA-mutated, advanced or metastatic breast cancer (as detected by an FDA-approved test), following progression on or after an endocrine-based regimen. The FDA also approved the companion diagnostic test, therascreen PIK3CA RGQ PCR Kit, to detect the PIK3CA mutation in a tissue and/or a liquid biopsy. Patients who are negative by the therascreen test using the liquid biopsy should undergo tumor biopsy for PIK3CA mutation testing. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 268,600 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2019 and about 41,760 women will die of the disease. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients.Alpelisib - Mechanism-of-Action

The PhosphoInositide 3-Kinase (PI3K) pathway is an intracellular signaling pathway important in the regulation of cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. PI3K is a lipid kinase and has four distinct isoforms – alpha, beta, gamma and delta, which play a unique role in the survival of different tumor types and establishment of supportive tumor microenvironments. The alpha and beta isoforms are expressed in a wide variety of tissues whereas the gamma and delta isoforms are primarily expressed in hematopoietic cells such as B and T cells. The PI3K alpha isoform is particularly important in breast cancer and plays an important role in tumorigenesis, supporting tumor angiogenesis and stromal interactions, making this a viable target. PIK3CA is an oncogene that codes for the alpha isoform of PI3K, (PI3Kα), more specifically for the alpha isoform of p110. The PI3k pathway is the most frequently altered pathway in human cancers including breast cancer, and has been implicated in disease progression in a significant number of patients with breast cancer. Activation of the PI3K pathway in breast cancer has been associated with resistance to endocrine therapy and disease progression. Approximately 40% of patients with Hormone Receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative breast cancers, harbor activating mutations in the PIK3CA isoform of PI3K, which is the most common mutation in HR+ breast cancer. Patients with advanced breast cancer harboring PIK3CA mutations typically have a poor prognosis. This provides a strong rationale for targeting the PI3K pathway in breast cancer.

PIQRAY® is an oral, alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor that specifically inhibits PIK3 in the PI3K/AKT kinase signaling pathway. Further, it was shown in preclinical studies that cancer cells with PIK3CA mutations are more sensitive to PIQRAY® than those without the mutation, across a broad range of tumor types. SOLAR-1 clinical trial, which was conducted to test this hypothesis, became the basis for this FDA approval.

SOLAR-1 is a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial, which studied the benefit of PIQRAY® in combination with FASLODEX® (Fulvestrant) among postmenopausal women and men with PIK3CA-mutated HR+/HER2 negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had progressed on or following prior Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) treatment with or without a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor. In this study, 572 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive PIQRAY® 300 mg orally daily or placebo once daily, in combination with FASLODEX® 500mg IM on days 1 and 15 of the first cycle and day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle. Patients were stratified based on visceral metastases and prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. A total of 341 patients had PIK3CA mutations upon testing of the tumor tissue with 169 patients receiving the PIQRAY® combination and 172 patients receiving FASLODEX® alone. Enrolled patients had received one or more prior lines of hormonal therapy, but no chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. They had not previously received FASLODEX® or any PI3K, Akt or mTOR inhibitor, and were not on concurrent anticancer therapy. Approximately half of the patients in each treatment group had lung or liver metastases and 6% had received prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) for patients with the PIK3CA mutation. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate, Health-Related Quality of Life, Efficacy in PIK3CA non-mutant cohort, Safety and Tolerability.

The Primary endpoint was met and at a median follow up of 20 months, the PFS was nearly twice as long in patients with PIK3CA mutations randomized to PIQRAY® plus FASLODEX® compared to the placebo plus FASLODEX® group. The median PFS was 11.0 months in the PIQRAY® group compared to 5.7 months in the placebo group (HR=0.65; P=0.00065). In patients with measurable, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (N=262), the Overall Response Rate was 36% for the PIQRAY® plus FASLODEX® group versus 16% for placebo plus FASLODEX® group (P=0.0002). There was no significant PFS benefit noted in the PIK3CA-nonmutant patient group receiving PIQRAY® plus FASLODEX® The most frequent toxicities with PIQRAY® were hyperglycemia which could be managed with Metformin, nausea, decreased appetite and skin rash.

It was concluded that PIQRAY® given along with FASLODEX® significantly improved Progression Free Survival compared to Placebo plus FASLODEX® with manageable toxicities. The authors commented that this is the first study to show statistically significant, clinically meaningful PFS improvement with an alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor in PIK3CA-mutated HR+, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer, highlighting the importance of clinical genomics in advanced breast cancer. PIQRAY® is also the first novel drug approved under the Real-Time Oncology Review pilot program. It however remains unclear whether PIQRAY® should be incorporated into the current treatment paradigm upfront, along with endocrine therapy and a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, or sequentially following disease progression on a combination of endocrine therapy and a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) for advanced breast cancer (ABC): results of the phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial. André F, Ciruelos EM, Rubovszky G, et al. Presented during the Presidential Symposium 1 at: 2018 ESMO Congress; October 19-23; Munich, Germany. Abstract LBA3_PR.

PIQRAY® (Alpelisib)

RR

The FDA on May 24, 2019 approved PIQRAY® in combination with FASLODEX® (Fulvestrant) for postmenopausal women, and men, with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, PIK3CA-mutated, advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as detected by an FDA-approved test following progression on or after an endocrine-based regimen. PIQRAY® is a product of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

FDA Approves KADCYLA® for Early Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on May 3, 2019, approved KADCYLA® (Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine) for the adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant Taxane and HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab)-based treatment. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 268,600 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2019 and about 41,760 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive, early stage as well as advanced metastatic breast cancer. Since the approval of HERCEPTIN®, several other HER2-targeted therapies have become available. The duration of adjuvant HERCEPTIN® therapy has been 12 months and this length of treatment was empirically adopted from the pivotal registration trials. Mechanism-of-Action-KADCYLA

KADCYLA® is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) comprised of the antibody HERCEPTIN® and the chemotherapy agent Emtansine, linked together. Upon binding to the HER2 receptor, it not only inhibits the HER2 signaling pathways but also delivers a chemotherapy agent Emtansine, a microtubule inhibitor, directly inside the tumor cells. This agent is internalized by lysosomes and destroys the HER2-positive tumor cells upon intracellular release. In the EMILIA trial, KADCYLA® was associated with significant increase in Overall Survival when compared with TYKERB® (Lapatinib) plus XELODA® (Capecitabine), in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, who had previously received HERCEPTIN® and a Taxane.

It is well established that patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer following HERCEPTIN® based neoadjuvant therapies have a pathological Complete Response rate of 40-60%. Those without a pathological Complete Response tend to have significantly less favorable outcomes. These patients irrespective of pathological response status complete their standard adjuvant therapy which includes 12 months of HER2-targeted therapy. KATHERINE trial was conducted to evaluate the benefit of switching from standard HER2-directed therapy to single-agent KADCYLA®, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with either single or dual HER2 targeted therapy, in patients with residual invasive cancer at surgery. This study was conducted to address the unmet need of patients who have residual invasive breast cancer after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy.

The KATHERINE trial is an open-label, phase III global study, which compared KADCYLA® with HERCEPTIN®, as an adjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, who had residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HERCEPTIN®. This study included 1,486 patients with HER2-positive early stage breast cancer, who were found to have residual invasive disease in the breast or axillary lymph nodes at surgery, following at least six cycles (16 weeks) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a Taxane (with or without Anthracycline) and HERCEPTIN®. Within 12 weeks of surgery, patients (N=1486) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to KADCYLA® 3.6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks or HERCEPTIN® 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks, for 14 cycles (743 patients in each group). Both treatment groups were well balanced and hormone receptor positive disease was present in 72% of the patients. The majority of the patients (77%) had received an Anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, and in 19% of the patients, another HER2-targeted agent in addition to HERCEPTIN® (dual HER2 blockade) had been administered as a component of neoadjuvant therapy. The Primary end point was invasive Disease Free Survival (defined as freedom from ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence, ipsilateral locoregional invasive breast cancer recurrence, contralateral invasive breast cancer, distant recurrence, or death from any cause). The median duration of follow up was 41.4 months in the KADCYLA® group and 40.9 months in the HERCEPTIN® group.

At the prespecified interim analysis, invasive disease occurred in 12.2% of patients who received KADCYLA® and 22.2% of patients who received HERCEPTIN®. The estimated percentage of patients who were free of invasive disease at 3 years was 88.3% in the KADCYLA® group and 77.0% in the HERCEPTIN® group. Invasive Disease Free Survival, which was the Primary end point of the study, was significantly higher in the KADCYLA® group than in the HERCEPTIN® group (HR=0.50; P<0.001).This suggested that KADCYLA® reduced the risk of developing an invasive breast cancer recurrence or death by 50%. Distant recurrence as the first invasive disease event occurred in 10.5% of patients in the KADCYLA® group and in 15.9% of the HERCEPTIN® group. A consistent benefit was seen across all prespecified subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of KADCYLA®, with more toxicities associated with KADCYLA® than with HERCEPTIN®. Additional follow-up will be necessary to determine the Overall Survival benefit with adjuvant KADCYLA®.

It was concluded that among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who had residual invasive disease after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, substituting KADCYLA® for adjuvant HERCEPTIN® reduced the risk of recurrence of invasive breast cancer or death by 50%, with the benefit seen across all patient subgroups. The authors added that even though KATHERINE trial focused on higher-risk patients with residual invasive breast cancer after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, CNS recurrence remains a persistent problem. Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. von Minckwitz G, Huang C-S, Mano MS, et al. for the KATHERINE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2019;380:617-628

KADCYLA® (Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine)

RR

The FDA on May 3, 2019, approved KADCYLA® for the adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC), who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant Taxane and HERCEPTIN® (trastuzumab)-based treatment.KADCYLA® is a product of Genentech, Inc.

Patients should be selected based on an FDA-approved companion diagnostic for KADCYLA®. FDA also approved both the Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody assay and the INFORM HER2 Dual ISH DNA Probe Cocktail assay as companion diagnostic devices for selecting patients.

Six Prognostic Factors That Predict Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after DCIS

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 268,600 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2019 and about 41,760 women will die of the disease. Carcinoma in situ of the breast also known as Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) is defined as a malignant proliferation of ductal epithelial cells that are confined to the milk ducts without invasion of the basement membrane, and is a precursor lesion to invasive carcinoma. DCIS accounts for approximately 25% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers. Patients with small, screening-detected lesions, are often treated with breast-conserving surgery (to prevent the development of invasive breast cancer), followed by adjuvant radiation and hormonal therapy, although neither of the latter two interventions have been shown to improve survival outcomes. As such, a significant number of patients are overtreated. There remains a large unmet need, to distinguish relatively benign DCIS from DCIS that will develop into invasive breast cancer.Normal-Milk-Duct DCIS Invasive-Breast-Cancer

The authors in this study performed a systematic review from 1970 to 2018, with meta-analyses of 1,781 articles from the PubMed database, to summarize current knowledge on prognostic factors for invasive disease, after a diagnosis of DCIS. The number of patients in the included studies ranged from 52 to 37,692. Of all the articles reviewed, 40 articles met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies assessed risk of invasive recurrence in women primarily diagnosed and treated for DCIS, and included at least 10 ipsilateral-invasive breast cancer events and 1 year of follow up. The mean follow up time ranged from 3.2 to 15.8 years. Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment (A working group comprising epidemiologists, statisticians, and clinicians developed this tool based on previous research and this tool can inform judgements of risk-of-bias in prognostic research). Meta-analyses were performed to estimate the average effect size of the prognostic factors.

The researchers identified six prognostic factors in the meta-analyses that were statistically significant and were associated with a 36% to 84% increase in the relative risk of recurrence of invasive disease after a DCIS diagnosis. These six factors included- 

1) African American race (43% higher risk)

2) Premenopausal status (59% higher risk)

3) Detection by palpation (84% higher risk)

4) Positive margins (63% higher risk)

5) High histologic grade (36% higher risk)

6) High p16 expression (51% higher risk).

Further, the authors identified frequently occurring biases in studies on invasive recurrence after DCIS and the highest risk of bias was attributable to insufficient handling of confounders and poorly described study groups. They added that avoiding these common methodological pitfalls can improve future study designs.

It was concluded that this study results may help clinicians distinguish indolent from potentially aggressive DCIS and prevent overtreatment.

Predictors of an Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after DCIS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Visser LL, Groen EJ, van Leeuwen FE, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28:835-845

High Body Fat Level Increases Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Normal BMI

RR

There is an approximately 30% increased risk of breast cancer recurrence or death in those who are obese, compared to those with ideal body weight. Obesity is associated with alterations in Insulin/glucose homeostasis, adipokines, and sex hormones, which may all play a role in breast cancer outcomes.
BMI (Body Mass Index) does not discriminate between adiposity and muscle, and individuals deemed healthy based on a normal BMI may still be prone to cardiometabolic disorders due to high levels of visceral fat. It has been reported that approximately 18% of women with normal BMI had excess fat, detected on DEXA scan.
In a recently published article in JAMA Oncology involving 3460 postmenopausal women with normal BMI, there was a 56% increase in the risk of developing ER-positive breast cancer per 5-kg increase in trunk fat, despite a normal BMI. This study concluded that a normal BMI may not be an adequate proxy for the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women but high body fat levels and altered levels of circulating metabolic and inflammatory factors may be associated with a higher risk of invasive breast cancer.

High Body Fat Level Increases Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Normal BMI

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 268,600 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2019 and about 41,760 women will die of the disease. Obesity is an important contributing factor to postmenopausal breast cancer incidence and mortality. Based on recently published meta-analysis, in women diagnosed with breast cancer, there is an approximately 30% increased risk of disease recurrence or death in those who are obese, compared to those with ideal body weight. Increasing physical activity may lower the risk of breast cancer recurrence. According to the consensus from the St Gallen Consensus Conference in 2015, obesity has been associated with poor breast cancer outcomes. Obesity is associated with alterations in Insulin/glucose homeostasis, adipokines, and sex hormones, which may all play a role in breast cancer outcomes. Weight loss can lead to reductions in C-reactive protein, Insulin, glucose, and Leptin. These mediators have all been implicated to have prognostic significance in breast cancer.

Body Mass Index (BMI) measures body size and is calculated based on height and weight. It is used as a measure of obesity. BMI however does not discriminate between adiposity and muscle and individuals deemed healthy based on a normal BMI may still be prone to cardiometabolic disorders due to high levels of visceral fat. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA or DEXA) is often utilized to measure bone mineral density and is the most accurate method presently available for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and to estimate fracture risk. DEXA scan can also be used to measure total body composition and fat content including the amount of visceral fat, with a high degree of accuracy by its ability to break down fat, bone and muscle tissue. It has been reported that approximately 18% of women with normal BMI had excess fat, detected on DEXA scan.

There are two types of adipose tissue in the human body, White Adipose Tissue (WAT) and Brown Adipose Tissue (BAT) which have antagonistic functions. White Adipose Tissue or white fat cells represent the body’s main type of fat tissue and each fat cell has a single lipid droplet. They are distributed in the subcutaneous tissue, around a person's waist and thighs and around internal organs (visceral fat). WAT stores excess energy as triglycerides and serves as an energy reservoir. Brown Adipose tissue (BAT) which is abundant in small mammals and in newborns generates heat by burning calories and helps them to survive cold temperatures. Brown adipocytes contain several small lipid droplets, and a high number of iron-containing mitochondria which gives brown fat its dark tan color. Most BAT is distributed in the lower neck and interscapular area of an adult, and above the collarbone. Higher quantities of BAT are associated with lower body weight and BAT decreases and body weight increases with increasing age.

Leptin is a hormone produced primarily by adipose tissue and circulating Leptin levels correlate with the body fat stores, with increased circulating Leptin levels noted in individuals with excess adiposity. Leptin can induce Aromatase which synthesizes estrogen, can directly stimulate cancer cell proliferation and survival, and activate Estrogen Receptor α via ligand-independent mechanism.Obesity-and-Breast-Cancer

The increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in women with normal BMI is poorly understood. Recent studies have shown that in these women with normal BMI, excess body fat is associated with adipocyte hypertrophy which correlates with WAT inflammation, increased circulating Leptin levels, elevated levels of Aromatase and elevated Insulin levels. Dysregulation of Insulin signaling can activate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways which in turn can enhance cell proliferation and increase the risk of breast cancer. Further, Insulin also induces insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which can activate ERα. Insulin resistance leads to reduced levels of sex hormone–binding globulin, resulting in elevated levels of free estradiol. It has been suggested that all of these changes collectively may play a role in the pathogenesis of obesity-related breast cancer. The present study was conducted to investigate the association between body fat and breast cancer risk in women with normal BMI.

The authors in this long-term prospective study examined the association between body fat mass, measured by DEXA scan, and the risk of breast cancer, in a secondary analysis of 3460 postmenopausal women with normal BMI (18.5-24.9), enrolled in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials or observational study. The goal of this study was to understand whether excess adipose tissue is associated with an increased breast cancer risk in women with normal BMI. Participants 50-79 years old with a mean age of 64 years underwent body fat measurement (the percentage of whole-body fat, trunk fat, and fat mass in both legs) with DEXA scan at 3 US designated centers at the time of study entry into the WHI clinical trials, and years 1, 3, 6, and 9. Levels of Insulin, glucose, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, adiponectin, and Leptin were measured in 3-13% of participants using baseline fasting blood specimens.

At a median follow up of 16 years, 182 incident breast cancers were confirmed, and 146 (80%) were ER positive. It was noted that among postmenopausal women with normal BMI, relatively high body fat levels were associated with an elevated risk of invasive breast cancer. The authors specifically, found a 56% increase in the risk of developing ER-positive breast cancer per 5-kg increase in trunk fat, despite a normal BMI. Elevated trunk fat levels were also associated with metabolic dysregulation and inflammation characterized by increased circulating levels of Insulin, Leptin, C-reactive protein, Interleukin 6 and triglycerides, whereas levels of HDL cholesterol and sex hormone–binding globulin were lower.

It was concluded from this large prospective study that normal BMI may not be an adequate proxy for the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. High body fat levels and altered levels of circulating metabolic and inflammatory factors may be associated with a higher risk of invasive breast cancer. Association of Body Fat and Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women with Normal Body Mass Index. A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Observational Study. Iyengar NM, Arthur R, Manson JE, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:155-163

FDA Approves TECENTRIQ® and ABRAXANE® Combination for Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer

RR

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous, molecularly diverse group of breast cancers and are ER (Estrogen Receptor), PR (Progesterone Receptor) and HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2) negative. Those with metastatic disease have one of the worst prognosis of all cancers with a median Overall Survival of 13 months.

TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) an anti PD-L1 monoclonal antibody given along with ABRAXANE® (Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound – nab Paclitaxel) improved the Progression Free Survival (PFS) by 20%, when compared with ABRAXANE® alone. This benefit was even more significant among patients with PD-L1–positive tumors with PFS improvement of 38%. The combination of TECENTRIQ® plus ABRAXANE® could potentially change how we manage patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer.