Tag: Breast Cancer

TECENTRIQ® and ABRAXANE® Significantly Prolonged Survival in Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and 40,920 women are expected to die from the disease. Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous, molecularly diverse group of breast cancers and are ER (Estrogen Receptor), PR (Progesterone Receptor) and HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2) negative. TNBC accounts for 15-20% of invasive breast cancers, with a higher incidence noted in young patients. It is usually aggressive, and tumors tend to be high grade and patients with TNBC are at a higher risk of both local and distant recurrence. Those with metastatic disease have one of the worst prognoses of all cancers with a median Overall Survival of 13 months. The majority of patients with TNBC who develop metastatic disease do so within the first 3 years after diagnosis, whereas those without recurrence during this period of time have survival rates similar to those with ER-positive breast cancers. The lack of known recurrent oncogenic drivers in patients with metastatic TNBC, presents a major therapeutic challenge. Nonetheless, patients with TNBC often receive chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic settings and approximately 30-40% of patients achieve a pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the neoadjuvant setting. Those who do not achieve a pathological Complete Response tend to have a poor prognosis. It therefore appears that there are subsets of patients with TNBC who may be inherently insensitive to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Three treatment approaches appear to be promising and they include immune therapies, PARP inhibition and inhibition of PI3K pathway.

Previously published studies have shown that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were associated with clinical benefit, when treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, in patients with TNBC, and improved clinical benefit was observed in patients with immune-enriched molecular subtypes of metastatic TNBC. TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) is an anti PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, designed to directly bind to PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thereby blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors, and thus enabling the activation of T cells. Single-agent TECENTRIQ® is presently approved for the treatment of metastatic Urothelial carcinoma and Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). TECENTRIQ® has also been shown to have clinical activity with acceptable safety profile in patients with other solid tumors including Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The premise for combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is that chemotherapy may enhance release of tumor antigens and antitumor responses to immune checkpoint inhibition. Taxanes in particular may additionally activate toll-like receptor activity and promote dendritic-cell activity. ABRAXANE® (Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound – nab Paclitaxel) was selected as a chemotherapy partner in the present study because at the time that this trial was designed, the glucocorticoid premedication that is required with solvent-based Paclitaxel (TAXOL®), had been hypothesized to affect immunotherapy activity.

IMpassion130 is an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial in which first-line treatment with TECENTRIQ® plus ABRAXANE®, was compared with placebo ABRAXANE®, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Patients with untreated metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (N=902) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and received TECENTRIQ® 840 mg IV or placebo on days 1 and 15 and ABRAXANE® 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors included presence or absence of liver metastases, use or non-use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane treatment, and PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells as a percentage of tumor area (less than 1% was considered PD-L1 negative versus1% or more considered PD-L1 positive) according to ImmunoHistochemical testing (IHC). Both treatment groups were well balanced. Approximately 40% of the patients were PD-L1 positive. The two Primary end points were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS).

At a median follow up of 12.9 months, the median PFS in the intent-to-treat population was 7.2 months with TECENTRIQ® plus ABRAXANE®, as compared with 5.5 months with placebo plus ABRAXANE® (HR=0.80; P=0.002). This suggested a 20% improvement in PFS with the TECENTRIQ® combination. Among patients with PD-L1–positive tumors, the addition of TECENTRIQ® improved PFS by 38% (HR=0.62; P<0.001) and similar benefit was noted in the OS, with a median OS of 25 months with the TECENTRIQ® combination and 15.5 months with placebo plus ABRAXANE® (HR=0.62). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 48.7% in the TECENTRIQ® and ABRAXANE® and 42.2% in the placebo plus ABRAXANE® group.

It was concluded that TECENTRIQ® plus ABRAXANE® significantly prolonged Progression Free Survival among patients with metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer in both the intent-to-treat population and the PD-L1 positive subgroup, and could potentially change how we manage patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. October 20, 2018. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615

Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive, early stage as well as advanced metastatic breast cancer.

ASCO published an adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario guideline, on optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer and adjuvant targeted therapy for HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor receptor 2) positive breast cancers, in 2016. The recent publication of phase III studies relevant to the clinical care of breast cancer patients prompted the ASCO Update Steering Group of the original Expert Panel, to provide a focused update of the 2016 guideline. With the exception of this focused update, the remaining recommendations from the 2016 ASCO guideline are unchanged.

Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

Questions Addressed in Focused Update

1) Should adjuvant Capecitabine be given following completion of standard preoperative Anthracycline- and Taxane-based combination chemotherapy in patients with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer with residual invasive disease at surgery?

2) Should 1 year of adjuvant Pertuzumab be added to Trastuzumab-based combination chemotherapy in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer?

3) Should Neratinib be offered as extended adjuvant therapy for patients after combination chemotherapy and Trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy with early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer?

Target Population

Patients who are being considered for, or who are receiving, systemic therapy following definitive surgery for early-stage invasive breast cancer, defined largely as invasive cancer anatomic Stages I to IIIC

Target Audience

Medical oncologists, Pathologists, Surgeons, Oncology nurses, Patients, and Caregivers.

Focused Update Recommendations

Patients with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer with pathologic invasive residual disease at surgery following standard Anthracycline and Taxane-based preoperative therapy may be offered up to six to eight cycles of adjuvant Capecitabine (XELODA®).

Qualifying statements: If clinicians decide to use Capecitabine, then the Expert Panel preferentially supports the use of adjuvant Capecitabine in the subgroup of patients with Hormone Receptor negative, HER2-negative disease. The Capecitabine dosage used in the CREATE-X study (1,250 mg/m2 PO twice daily) is associated with higher toxicity in patients 65 years or older.

Clinicians may add 1 year of adjuvant Pertuzumab (PERJETA® ) to Trastuzumab (HERCEPTIN®)-based combination chemotherapy in patients with high-risk, early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer.

Qualifying statements: The Expert Panel preferentially supports Pertuzumab in patients with node-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer in view of the clinically insignificant absolute benefit observed among node-negative patients. After a median follow up of 3.8 years, Pertuzumab offered a modest Disease Free Survival (DFS) benefit. The first planned interim analysis did not show an Overall Survival (OS) benefit in the trial population. There are no data to guide the duration of Pertuzumab in patients who received neoadjuvant Pertuzumab and achieved a pathologic Complete Response.

Clinicians may use extended adjuvant therapy with Neratinib (NERLYNX®) to follow Trastuzumab in patients with early stage, HER2-positive breast cancer. Neratinib causes substantial diarrhea and diarrhea prophylaxis must be used.

Qualifying statements: The Expert Panel preferentially favors use of Neratinib in patients with HER2-positive, Hormone Receptor positive, and node-positive disease. At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, no OS benefit has been observed. Patients who began Neratinib within 1 year of Trastuzumab completion appeared to derive the greatest benefit. There are no data on the added benefit of Neratinib in patients who also received Pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.

Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Denduluri N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Telli ML, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2433-2443.

HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

RR

HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update
SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive, early stage as well as advanced metastatic breast cancer. Since the approval of HERCEPTIN®, several other HER2-targeted therapies have become available. Accurate determination of HER2 status of the tumor is therefore essential for patients with invasive breast cancer, to ensure that those most likely to benefit are offered a HER2-targeted therapy and those who are unlikely to benefit can avoid toxicities as well as financial burden associated with those drugs.
Laboratory testing for HER2 status in patients with breast cancer in the US is performed according to guidelines developed by an Expert panel of members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). The ASCO/CAP guidelines were first published in 2007 and were updated in 2013. The Expert panel in 2018 developed and issued a focused update of the clinical practice guideline on HER2 testing in breast cancer. This new information made available since the previous update in 2013 addresses uncommon clinical scenarios and improves clarity, particularly for infrequent HER2 test results that are of uncertain biologic or clinical significance. There are currently two approved methods for determining HER2 status in breast cancer: ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) and In Situ Hybridization (ISH). This new guideline enables the Health Care Provider, how to best evaluate some of the less common patterns in HER2 results emerging from ISH. 
Guideline Questions
1) What is the most appropriate definition for ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) 2+ (IHC equivocal)?
2) Must Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) testing be repeated on a surgical specimen if the initially tested core biopsy is negative?
3) What is the optimal algorithm for less common patterns observed when performing dual-probe In Situ Hybridization (ISH) HER2 testing in breast cancer?
Updated Recommendations
1) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in more than 10% of tumor cells.
2) If the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not “must”) be ordered on the excision specimen based on some criteria (such as tumor grade 3).
3)The HER2 testing algorithm now includes more rigorous interpretation criteria of the less common patterns that can be seen in about 5% of all cases when HER2 status in breast cancer is evaluated using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 (HER2/Chromosome Enumeration Probe 17 [CEP17] ratio of 2.0 or more; average HER2 copy number less than 4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 (HER2/CEP17 ratio less than 2.0; average HER2 copy number 6.0 or more signals per cell), and ISH group 4 (HER2/CEP17 ratio less than 2.0; average HER2 copy number 4.0 or more and less than 6.0 signals per cell). These cases, described as ISH groups 2-4, should now be assessed using a diagnostic approach that includes a concomitant review of the IHC (ImmunoHistoChemistry) test, which will help the pathologist make a final determination of the tumor specimen as HER2 positive or negative.
4)The Expert Panel also preferentially recommends the use of dual-probe instead of single-probe ISH assays, but it recognizes that several single-probe ISH assays have regulatory approval in many parts of the world. 
Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Wolff AC, Hammond EH, Allison KH, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2105-2122.

HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive, early stage as well as advanced metastatic breast cancer. Since the approval of HERCEPTIN®, several other HER2-targeted therapies have become available. Accurate determination of HER2 status of the tumor is therefore essential for patients with invasive breast cancer, to ensure that those most likely to benefit are offered a HER2-targeted therapy and those who are unlikely to benefit can avoid toxicities as well as financial burden associated with those drugs.

Laboratory testing for HER2 status in patients with breast cancer in the US is performed according to guidelines developed by an Expert panel of members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). The ASCO/CAP guidelines were first published in 2007 and were updated in 2013. The Expert panel in 2018 developed and issued a focused update of the clinical practice guideline on HER2 testing in breast cancer. This new information made available since the previous update in 2013 addresses uncommon clinical scenarios and improves clarity, particularly for infrequent HER2 test results that are of uncertain biologic or clinical significance. There are currently two approved methods for determining HER2 status in breast cancer: ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) and In Situ Hybridization (ISH). This new guideline enables the Health Care Provider, how to best evaluate some of the less common patterns in HER2 results emerging from ISH.

Guideline Questions

1) What is the most appropriate definition for ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) 2+ (IHC equivocal)?

2) Must Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) testing be repeated on a surgical specimen if the initially tested core biopsy is negative?

3) What is the optimal algorithm for less common patterns observed when performing dual-probe In Situ Hybridization (ISH) HER2 testing in breast cancer?

Updated Recommendations

1) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in more than 10% of tumor cells.

2) If the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not “must”) be ordered on the excision specimen based on some criteria (such as tumor grade 3).

3)The HER2 testing algorithm now includes more rigorous interpretation criteria of the less common patterns that can be seen in about 5% of all cases when HER2 status in breast cancer is evaluated using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 (HER2/Chromosome Enumeration Probe 17 [CEP17] ratio of 2.0 or more; average HER2 copy number less than 4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 (HER2/CEP17 ratio less than 2.0; average HER2 copy number 6.0 or more signals per cell), and ISH group 4 (HER2/CEP17 ratio less than 2.0; average HER2 copy number 4.0 or more and less than 6.0 signals per cell). These cases, described as ISH groups 2-4, should now be assessed using a diagnostic approach that includes a concomitant review of the IHC (ImmunoHistoChemistry) test, which will help the pathologist make a final determination of the tumor specimen as HER2 positive or negative.

4)The Expert Panel also preferentially recommends the use of dual-probe instead of single-probe ISH assays, but it recognizes that several single-probe ISH assays have regulatory approval in many parts of the world. 

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Wolff AC, Hammond EH, Allison KH, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2105-2122.

KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® Improve Progression Free Survival in Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. Approximately 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. Cyclin Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity and phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation. The understanding of the role of Cyclin Dependent Kinases in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.Cell-Cycle-Inhibition-by-RIBOCICLIB-A-CDK4-and-CDK6-Inhibitor

KISQALI® (Ribociclib) is an orally bioavailable, selective, small-molecule inhibitor of CDK4/6 that blocks the phosphorylation of RetinoBlastoma protein, thereby preventing cell-cycle progression and inducing G1 phase arrest. KISQALI® in combination with an Aromatase Inhibitor has been approved by the FDA for pre and perimenopausal women with HR (Hormone Receptor)-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as initial endocrine-based therapy. The efficacy of KISQALI® was evaluated in two prior randomized phase III studies. In the MONALEESA-2 trial which evaluated KISQALI® in combination with FEMARA® (Letrozole) compared to FEMARA® alone, in postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received no prior therapy for their advanced breast cancer, the addition of KISQALI® to FEMARA® significantly prolonged Progression Free Survival (PFS) compared to FEMARA® alone. In the MONALEESA-7 study, KISQALI® in combination with Tamoxifen or a Non-Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor plus ZOLADEX® (Goserelin) was compared with Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor plus ZOLADEX®, in premenopausal or perimenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2- negative advanced breast cancer, who had not previously received endocrine therapy for advanced disease. In this study of premenopausal women, KISQALI® plus endocrine therapy significantly improved PFS compared with placebo plus endocrine therapy

MONALEESA-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study which compared the efficacy of KISQALI® in combination with FASLODEX® with FASLODEX® alone, among postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received no prior or only one line of prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease. In this trial, 726 women were randomized, of whom 367 were treatment-naïve and 345 patients had received up to one line of prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease. . Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® (N=484) or placebo plus FASLODEX® (N=242). Treatment consisted of KISQALI® 600 mg orally daily 3 weeks on and 1 week off and FASLODEX® 500 mg IM on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, with an additional dose given on day 15 of cycle 1. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of lung or liver metastases and prior endocrine therapy (first-line versus second-line). The median age in both groups was 63 years. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival. Secondary end points included Overall Survival, Overall Response Rate, and Safety. The median time from randomization to data cutoff was 20.4 months.

Among all randomized patients, the median PFS in the KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® group was 20.5 months compared to 12.8 months in the FASLODEX® plus placebo group (HR= 0.59; P<0.001). This represented a 41% reduction in the risk of disease progression. The PFS benefit was consistent among the 367 patients who were treatment-naïve (HR=0.57) and 345 patients had received up to one line of prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease (HR=0.56). In the subgroup of patients taking KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® as first-line treatment, the median PFS was not reached and 70% were estimated to remain Progression Free at median follow up of 16.5 months. Among those patients with measurable disease at baseline, the Overall Response Rate was 40.9% for the KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® arm versus 28.7% for FASLODEX® plus placebo group (P=0.003). At first interim analysis, the Overall Survival data were immature. The most common grade 3/4 Adverse Events in patients receiving KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® compared to FASLODEX® alone were neutropenia (53.4% versus 0%) and leukopenia (14.1% versus 0%).

It was concluded that KISQALI® plus FASLODEX® might represent a new, first or second-line treatment option for patients with Hormone Receptor-positive, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. MONALEESA-3 is the only randomized Phase III trial to study a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus FASLODEX® in the first-line setting, with demonstrable efficacy in patients with de novo advanced breast cancer and those who had not received adjuvant therapy in more than a year. Ribociclib (RIB) + fulvestrant (FUL) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2 –) advanced breast cancer (ABC): Results from MONALEESA-3. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia SKL, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018: 36, (suppl; abstr 1000).

Six Months Adjuvant HERCEPTIN® Safer and Efficacious in Early Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive, early stage breast cancer. The duration of adjuvant HERCEPTIN® therapy has been 12 months and this length of treatment was empirically adopted from the pivotal registration trials.HER2-Directed-Therapy

PERSEPHONE is a randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial in which a 6-month course of adjuvant HERCEPTIN® was compared with the standard 12-month course, among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. This study was conducted based on the hypothesis that shorter course of treatment with HERCEPTIN® could reduce cardiotoxicities as well as cost without compromising efficacy. This trial randomized 4089 patients across 152 sites in a 1:1 ratio to receive HERCEPTIN® for 6 months (N=2044) or 12 months (N=2045). In this trial, 69% of patients had ER-positive tumors, 41% received Anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 49% received Anthracycline and Taxane-based chemotherapy, 10% received Taxane-based chemotherapy, 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy, and sequential HERCEPTIN® was administered in 54% of patients. This study also included assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) every 3 months until month 12, as well as continued Quality of Life and health economic assessments at months 18 and 24. The Primary endpoint was Disease Free Survival (DFS) from the time of diagnosis.

At a median follow-up period of 5 years, the 4-year DFS rate was identical in both treatment groups. DFS was 89.8% with 12 months of HERCEPTIN® compared with 89.4% with the 6-month course, which met the criteria for noninferiority (P=0.01). Further, only 4% of the patients enrolled in the 6-month HERCEPTIN® group discontinued HERCEPTIN® treatment due to cardiotoxicities compared with 8% in the 12-month group (P<0.0001), suggesting that the number of patients stopping treatment due to cardiac toxicities was cut in half with the shorter duration of treatment with HERCEPTIN®. Patients receiving shorter course of HERCEPTIN® also had a more rapid recovery of their cardiac LVEF following treatment, compared with the standard of care group (P=0.02).

It was concluded from this largest, reduced duration, noninferiority trial that a shorter 6-month course of adjuvant HERCEPTIN® was noninferior for Disease Free Survival, compared with the standard 12-month schedule, among patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, with an additional benefit of reduction in cardiac toxicities, as well as cost both to the patients and healthcare systems. Overall Survival data was not available at the time of this analysis. PERSEPHONE: 6 versus 12 months (m) of adjuvant trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2 positive (+) early breast cancer (EBC): Randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with definitive 4-year (yr) disease-free survival (DFS) results. Earl HM, Hiller L, Vallier A-L, et al. J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 506)

KISQALI® (Ribociclib)

RR

The FDA on July 18, 2018 expanded the indication for KISQALI® in combination with an Aromatase Inhibitor for pre and perimenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as initial endocrine-based therapy. KISQALI® is a product of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2018 Endocrine Therapy Alone is Adequate for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients with Intermediate Risk Recurrence Score

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. Approximately 50% of all breast cancers are Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative tumors. Patients with early stage breast cancer often receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The Oncotype DX breast cancer assay, is a multigene genomic test that analyzes the activity of a group of 21 genes and is able to predict the risk of breast cancer recurrence and likelihood of benefit from systemic chemotherapy, following surgery, in women with early stage breast cancer. Chemotherapy recommendations for early stage, hormone receptor positive, HER negative, early stage breast cancer patients, are often made based on tumor size, grade, ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) markers such as Ki-67, nodal status and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) assay.

Oncotype Dx assay categorizes patients on the basis of Recurrence Scores into Low risk (less than 18), Intermediate risk (18-30), and High risk (31 or more). It has been unclear whether patients in the Intermediate risk group benefited from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. TAILORx was specifically designed to address this question and provide a very definitive answer. In this study, the Intermediate risk Recurrent Score (18-30) was changed to 11-25, to account for exclusion of higher-risk patients with HER2-positive disease and to minimize the potential for under treatment.

TAILORx ((Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment) is a phase III, randomized, prospective, non-inferiority trial, and is the largest breast cancer treatment trial ever conducted, and the first precision medicine trial ever done, according to the authors. In this study, 10,273 women, 18-75 years of age, with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer were enrolled. Patients had tumors 1.1-5.0 cm in size (or 0.6-1.0 cm and intermediate/high grade). Patients were divided into three groups based on their Recurrence Score. Women with a Low Recurrence Score of 0-10 received endocrine therapy alone and those with a High Recurrence Score of 26-100 received endocrine therapy in combination with standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient with Intermediate Recurrence Score of 11-25 (N=6711) were randomly assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone or endocrine therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The Primary endpoint was invasive Disease Free Survival, defined as recurrence of cancer in the breast, regional lymph nodes, and/or distant organs, a second primary cancer in the opposite breast or another organ, or death from any cause.

At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, the study met its Primary endpoint, and it was noted that that endocrine therapy alone was non-inferior to chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy, in patients with Intermediate Recurrence Score of 11-25. At 9 years, patients with Intermediate Recurrence Scores receiving endocrine therapy or chemotherapy in combination with endocrine therapy showed similar invasive Disease Free Survival rates (83.3% vs 84.3%), distant Recurrence Free Interval (94.5% vs 95.0%), Recurrence Free Interval (92.2% vs 92.9%) and Overall Survival (93.9% vs 93.8%) respectively. These findings suggested that there was no benefit from adding chemotherapy to endocrine therapy, for this patient group.

The authors also conducted an exploratory analysis of patients in the Intermediate Risk group to determine which patients would benefit from added chemotherapy. They noted that there was no significant interaction between menopause, tumor size or grade, with Recurrence Score. There was however an interaction between age and Recurrence Score. In women 50 years or younger with a Recurrence Score of 16-20, there were 2% fewer distant recurrences, and in those with a recurrence score of 21-25, there were 7% fewer distant recurrences with the addition of chemotherapy, suggesting that younger women with a Recurrence Score of 16-25 had some benefit with the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy.

It was concluded that women older than 50 years with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and a Recurrence Score of 0-25, as well as women 50 years or younger with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and a Recurrence Score of 0-15, could be spared from chemotherapy, based on this study. This study showed that chemotherapy could be avoided in about 70% of these patients, by allowing this test to tailor treatment. Further, this prospective study reflects outcomes with current modern chemotherapy and endocrine therapy regimens. The authors recommended that any patient 75 years or younger with early-stage breast cancer should therefore be offered Oncotype DX assay test, for guidance regarding chemotherapy recommendations after surgery. TAILORx: phase III trial of chemoendocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and an intermediate prognosis 21-gene recurrence score. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Wood WC, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl; abstr LBA1).

Increased Risk of Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma with Breast Implants

RR

SUMMARY: Breast implants are among the most commonly used medical devices and the number of women with breast implants diagnosed with Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma in the breast (breast-ALCL) have increased over the past 10 years. The FDA in 2011, identified a possible association between breast implants and the development of Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL), and there has been growing body of medical literature describing the natural history and long term outcomes of the disease. In 2016, the World Health Organization designated Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) as a T-Cell Lymphoma that can develop following breast implants.

The incidence of ALCL is higher with macrotextured implants than smooth implants. It has been postulated that textured implants have an increased surface area and a local inflammatory response, elicited by silicone-derived products or specific bacterial species adherent to the prosthesis surface (Biofilm) may play a role, potentiating capsular contracture and increasing T-cell response and possible conversion to BIA-ALCL. It remains unclear however, whether certain women including those with proven BRCA mutations have a genetically determined increased risk to develop lymphoma when exposed to breast implants via a genetically determined altered or exaggerated local immunological response. There are presently no evidence-based guidelines on how this condition should be detected, treated or followed up. It is however, suggested that any seroma more than 6-12 months after breast implantation, in the absence of infection, should be evaluated with ultrasonography and mammography, to identify a mass or lymph nodes that are suspicious for lymphoma. The seroma should be aspirated and the fluid analyzed for cytology, cultures, flow cytometry and cell block. If cytology is negative, patients should be closely monitored for recurrence of seroma. Biopsy should be performed if a mass is present, and if ALCL is confirmed, patients will respond to capsulectomy and removal of the implant, as ALCL confined within the capsule often have an indolent course and good prognosis. In contrast, patients who present with a distinct mass may have a more aggressive disease course and poor prognosis, and require chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Postoperatively evaluation if BIA-ALCL is confirmed, should include a PET-CT scan and bone marrow biopsy to rule out systemic disease. It is recommended that patients receive clinical follow up at least every 6 months for 5 years along with breast ultrasonography for 2 years, and those who undergo reinsertion of the implant should be followed up beyond 5 years.

In this publication, a case-control study was conducted, comparing the prevalence of breast implants between women with primary breast-ALCL and women with primary breast lymphomas other than ALCL, using a comprehensive Dutch pathology database. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative and absolute risks of breast ALCL in women with breast implants. The authors identified all patients diagnosed with primary Non Hodgkin Lymphoma in the breast between 1990 and 2016 and retrieved clinical data, including breast implant status, from the treating physicians, through the population-based nationwide Dutch pathology registry. They then calculated the risk of breast-ALCL in women both with and without breast implants.

The estimated prevalence of breast implants in women aged 20-70 years was 3.3%. It was noted that among 43 patients with breast-ALCL (median age 59 years), 32 had ipsilateral breast implants, compared with 1 among 146 women with other primary breast lymphomas. The median time to development of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) was 13 years after an implant was placed. Most cases of BIA-ALCL (75%) in this Dutch study were associated with macrotextured implants and the Complete Remission rate was 90% after treatment and only 6% of the 32 affected women died of disseminated disease. In this study, the number of women with implants needed to cause 1 breast-ALCL case before age 75 years was 6920. Affected patients had implants for cosmetic reasons alone, for reconstruction in transgender surgery, after breast cancer surgery, and after prophylactic mastectomy for high breast cancer risk.

It was concluded that breast implants are associated with increased risk of breast-ALCL, but the absolute risk remains small. With an increasing number of breast implant insertions, the need for increased awareness among the public, medical professionals, and regulatory bodies is imperative and it is essential to promote alternative cosmetic procedures, and recognize this rare clinical entity. Breast Implants and the Risk of Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in the Breast. de Boer M, van Leeuwen FE, Hauptmann M, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:335-341.

Dual HER2 Blockade Along with an Aromatase Inhibitor is an Effective Chemotherapy-Sparing Alternative Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 266,120 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2018 and about 40,920 women will die of the disease. The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1 (EGFR), HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. Approximately 50% of HER2-positive breast cancers are Hormone Receptor positive.

Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer are often treated with anti-HER2 targeted therapy along with chemotherapy, irrespective of hormone receptor status, and this has resulted in significantly improved treatment outcomes. HER2-targeted therapies include HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab), TYKERB® (Lapatinib), PERJETA® (Pertuzumab) and KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine).

Dual HER2 blockade with HERCEPTIN® and PERJETA®, given along with chemotherapy (with or without endocrine therapy), as first line treatment, in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients, was shown to significantly improve Progression Free Survival (PFS) as well as Overall Survival. The superior benefit with dual HER2 blockade has been attributed to differing mechanisms of action and synergistic interaction between HER2 targeted therapies. Not all HER2-positive, Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients, are candidates for chemotherapy. These patients however may benefit from anti-HER2 targeted therapy given along with endocrine therapy.

Preclinical evidence suggested that endocrine resistance may be related to cross talk between HER2- and Hormone Receptor-signaling pathways. HER2 inhibition may in turn enable the Estrogen Receptor (ER) to become the primary driver of cell proliferation, resulting in relative resistance to anti-HER2 therapy. Therefore, targeting both HER2 and ER simultaneously may be essential to derive optimal benefit among patients with HER2-positive Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. Previously published studies demonstrated improved median PFS when single HER2 blockade combined with endocrine therapy was compared with endocrine therapy alone, among treatment naïve patients with HER2-positive and Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer.

Based on the improved outcomes with dual anti-HER2 blockade compared with single HER2 blockade in both neoadjuvant as well as metastatic settings, this present study was designed to evaluate the superiority of dual HER2 blockade with TYKERB® and HERCEPTIN® given along with an Aromatase Inhibitor (AI), over single HER2 blockade with HERCEPTIN® given along with an AI, in patients with HER2-positive, Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer, who experienced disease progression after prior neo(adjuvant)/first-line HERCEPTIN® based chemotherapy. This study also included a third treatment arm of TYKERB® plus an AI, which was compared with the other two treatment groups.

The ALTERNATIVE study is an open-label, phase III trial, in which 355 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either TYKERB® along with HERCEPTIN® plus an AI (N=120), HERCEPTIN® plus an AI (N=117) or TYKERB® plus an AI. TYKERB® was administered at 1000 mg orally daily in the dual HER2 blockade group and at 1500 mg orally daily in the TYKERB® plus AI group. Patients receiving TYKERB® were urged to initiate treatment with Loperamide at the onset of diarrhea. HERCEPTIN® was administered IV at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by the maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Physician’s choice of AIs included either Letrozole 2.5 mg, Anastrozole 1 mg or Exemestane 25 mg, orally daily. Enrolled patients were postmenopausal women, with histologically or cytologically confirmed ER-positive and/or Progesterone Receptor-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast Cancer, as determined in a local laboratory. Prior treatment with endocrine therapy and disease progression during or after a prior HERCEPTIN® based chemotherapy regimen in the neo(adjuvant) setting and/or in the first-line metastatic setting, was a requirement for enrollment in this study. Only one prior regimen in the metastatic setting was allowed. Patients for whom chemotherapy was felt appropriate per treating physician’s judgement, were excluded from the study. Two thirds of the patients had received HERCEPTIN® based regimens in adjuvant setting and approximately one third in metastatic setting. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) with dual HER2 blockade plus AI compared with HERCEPTIN® plus AI. Secondary end points included PFS comparison of other treatment groups, Overall Survival, Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate and Safety.

The study met its Primary end point and the median PFS utilizing dual HER2 blockade with a combination of TYKERB® along with HERCEPTIN® plus an AI was 11 months, compared with 5.7 months for HERCEPTIN® plus an AI (HR=0.62, P=0.0064). This represented a 38% reduction in the risk of disease progression. The PFS benefit was consistently observed in various predefined subgroups of patients. Further, the ORR and Clinical Benefit Rate were superior in the TYKERB® along with HERCEPTIN® plus AI group compared to HERCEPTIN® plus AI group ((31.7% versus 13.7% and 41% versus 31%, respectively). Although survival data were immature, there was also a trend favoring treatment with dual HER2 (median 46 months versus 40 months). When other treatment groups were compared, the median PFS with TYKERB® plus an AI was 8.3 months compared to 5.7 months with HERCEPTIN® plus an AI (HR=0.71, P=0.036), suggesting that among HER2-positive, Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients, who had progressed after prior treatment with HERCEPTIN®, anti-HER2 treatment with TYKERB® along with an AI may be a reasonable alternative, although this hypothesis will need to be confirmed. Common adverse events included higher incidence of diarrhea and rash in the groups treated with TYKERB® and serious adverse events were similar across the three treatment groups. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was lower in the dual HER2 blockade group.

The authors concluded that dual HER2 blockade with a combination of TYKERB®, HERCEPTIN® and an Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) resulted in improved PFS compared with HERCEPTIN® plus an AI, among HER2-positive and Hormone Receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients, who had prior HERCEPTIN® based chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in the neo(adjuvant) and/or first line metastatic setting. This dual HER2 blockade combination offers an effective and safe chemotherapy-sparing alternative treatment regimen for this patient population. Phase III, Randomized Study of Dual Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Blockade With Lapatinib Plus Trastuzumab in Combination With an Aromatase Inhibitor in Postmenopausal Women With HER2-Positive, Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: ALTERNATIVE. Johnston SR, Hegg R, Im S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2017;36:741-748