Author: RR

Shorter Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 140,250 new cases of ColoRectal Cancer will be diagnosed in the United States in 2018 and over 50,630 patients are expected to die of the disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected, locally advanced, node-positive (stage III) colon cancer, has been the standard of care since the 1990s. Adjuvant treatment with an ELOXATIN® (Oxaliplatin) based chemotherapy regimen has been considered standard intervention since 2004, for patients with stage III colon cancer, following surgical resection, and has been proven to decrease the chance of recurrent disease. Chemotherapy regimens have included (FOLFOX – Leucovorin, 5-FluoroUracil, ELOXATIN®) or CAPOX/XELOX (XELODA®/Capecitabine and ELOXATIN®), given over a period of 6 months. ELOXATIN® can however be associated with neuropathy which can be long lasting or permanent, depending on the duration of therapy. Additional toxicities with longer duration of chemotherapy include diarrhea, fatigue as well as more office visits.

The IDEA Collaboration is a prospective, pre-planned pooled analysis of 6 concurrently conducted randomized phase III trials, which included 12,834 patients from 12 countries. The goal of this study was to determine if 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy would be as effective as 6 months of therapy and would be non-inferior. Of the enrolled patients with stage III disease, 13% had T1-2 disease, 66% had T3 tumors and 21% had T4 tumors. Seventy one percent (71%) had N1 disease and 28% of the patients had N2 disease. Approximately 60% had low-risk disease (T1-3, N1) and 40% had high-risk (T4 or N2). Overall, about 40% of patients received CAPOX regimen and 60% received FOLFOX regimen. The primary endpoint was Disease Free Survival (DFS).

At a median follow up of 41.8 months, although non-inferiority of 3 months of therapy as compared with 6 months of therapy could not be confirmed in the overall treatment population, clinically relevant findings according to treatment were noted, in prespecified subgroups of patients. Among those patients who received FOLFOX regimen, 6 months of adjuvant therapy was superior to 3 months (HR=1.16; P=0.001 for superiority of 6-month therapy). However, among those patients who received CAPOX, the Disease Free Survival for 3 months versus 6 months was non-inferior (HR=0.95; P=0.006), and this was highly significant.

In an exploratory analysis, it was noted that among the patient group with low-risk cancers (T1-3, N1 cancers), 3 months of therapy was non-inferior to 6 months of therapy (HR= 1.01) with 3-year disease-free survival of 83.1% and 83.3%, respectively. However, among the patients with high-risk cancers (T4, N2, or both), 6 months of adjuvant therapy was superior to 3 months (HR= 1.12; P=0.01 for superiority).

When subgroup analysis was performed according to treatment and risk group, among the patients with low-risk tumors, 3 months of adjuvant therapy with CAPOX was non-inferior to 6 months of therapy. Outcomes after 3 months of adjuvant FOLFOX therapy were worse than those after 6 months, independent of risk group. For patients with high-risk tumors, 6 months of adjuvant therapy with FOLFOX was superior to 3 months, with a 3-year disease-free survival of 64.7% versus 61.5%. It has been hypothesized that the protracted delivery of a Fluoropyrimidine with CAPOX might have been more effective than the twice-monthly 5-FUinfusions with FOLFOX as an adjuvant therapy. Grade 2 or more neurotoxicity was significantly lower for patients who received 3 months of adjuvant therapy versus 6 months (P <0.0001), regardless of the treatment regimen (17% vs 48% for FOLFOX and 15% vs 45% for CAPOX/XELOX, respectively).

It was concluded by the IDEA collaboration that, a risk-based approach has to be taken when making adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for patients with stage III colon cancer, taking into consideration choice of treatment regimen and duration of therapy. In patients treated with adjuvant CAPOX/XELOX regimen, 3 months of therapy was as effective as 6 months, particularly in the low risk subgroup. In patients treated with FOLFOX, 6 months of adjuvant therapy compared to 3 months, resulted in a higher rate of Disease Free Survival, particularly in the high-risk subgroup. Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer. Grothey A, Sobrero AF, Shields AF, et al. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:1177-1188

AFINITOR® (Everolimus)

RR

The FDA on April 10, 2018 approved AFINITOR® for the adjunctive treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)-associated partial-onset seizures. AFINITOR® is also approved for two other manifestations of TSC: TSC-associated SubEpendymal Giant cell Astrocytoma (SEGA) and TSC-associated renal angiomyolipoma. AFINITOR® is a product of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

RUBRACA® (Rucaparib)

RR

The FDA on April 6, 2018 approved RUBRACA®, a Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, for the maintenance treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are in a Complete or Partial Response to platinum-based chemotherapy. RUBRACA® is a product of Clovis Oncology Inc.

BLINCYTO® (Blinatumomab)

RR

The FDA on March 29, 2018 granted accelerated approval to BLINCYTO® for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in first or second complete remission with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) greater than or equal to 0.1%. BLINCYTO® is a product of Amgen Inc.

TASIGNA® (Nilotinib)

RR

The FDA on March 22, 2018 approved TASIGNA® for pediatric patients 1 year of age or older with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (Ph+ CML-CP) or Ph+ CML-CP resistant or intolerant to prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) therapy. TASIGNA® is a product of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

FDA Approves RUBRACA® for Maintenance Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on April 6, 2018, approved RUBRACA® (Rucaparib), a Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, for the maintenance treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who are in a Complete or Partial Response to platinum-based chemotherapy. RUBRACA® was initially approved in December 2016 as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic) associated advanced ovarian cancer, who have been treated with two or more chemotherapies.

RUBRACA® is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of Poly-Adenosine diphosphate [ADP] Ribose Polymerase (PARP), developed for treatment of ovarian cancer, associated with Homologous Recombination DNA repair deficiency (HRD). Previously published clinical data had suggested that ovarian cancer patients with and without evidence of a germline BRCA mutation, benefit from treatment with a PARP inhibitor, and that maintenance treatment with a PARP inhibitor following a response to platinum-based treatment increases Progression Free Survival (PFS), in patients with ovarian cancer. Even though patients with or without BRCA mutation benefited, the most benefit was derived in those with BRCA mutation.MOA-of-RUBRACA

The approval of RUBRACA® was based on ARIEL3, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial, which evaluated the benefit of RUBRACA® versus placebo, after response to second-line or later platinum-based chemotherapy, in patients with high-grade, recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma. In this trial, 561 patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive RUBRACA® 600 mg orally twice daily (N=372) or placebo (N=189). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients had recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, and had been treated with at least two prior treatments of platinum-based chemotherapy, and were in Complete or Partial Response to the most recent platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients had CA-125 level of less than the upper limit of normal. Using Next-Generation Sequencing assay, tumor tissue was examined to determine whether DNA contained a deleterious somatic or germline BRCA mutation (tBRCA), in addition to determining the percentage of genomic Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH). Positive Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) status was defined as tBRCA-positive and/or LOH high. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival in three patient cohorts – all patients, HRD subgroup, and tumor BRCA subgroup.

It was noted that there was a statistically significant improvement in median Progression Free Survival (PFS) for all patients assigned to RUBRACA®, compared with placebo (median PFS 10.8 versus 5.4 months, HR=0.36; P<0.0001). In the HRD subgroup, the median PFS was 13.6 months for those assigned to RUBRACA®, versus 5.4 months for the placebo group (HR=0.32; P<0.0001), and in the tumor BRCA subgroup, the median PFS was 16.6 versus 5.4 months (HR=0.23; P <0.0001), respectively. The most common adverse reactions were fatigue, rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, cytopenias and abnormal liver function studies. Discontinuation due to adverse reactions occurred in 15% of patients receiving RUBRACA®.

It was concluded that RUBRACA® significantly improved Progression Free Survival in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer who had achieved a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and could be considered a new standard of care for women with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, following a complete or partial response to second-line or later lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. The FDA also concurrently approved the complementary diagnostic test, FoundationFocusTM CDx BRCA LOH for tumor samples, to determine HRD status.

Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Coleman RL, Oza AM, Lorusso D, et al. The Lancet 2017;390:1949-1961

Frontline TECENTRIQ® along with AVASTIN® and Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Advanced NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2018 about 234,030 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and over 154,050 patients will die of the disease. Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large cell carcinomas. Immunotherapy is an accepted second line intervention after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC, and is an approved first line therapy, for patients with high PD-L1 expressing tumors (50% or more). Further, immunotherapy with KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab), in combination with chemotherapy, has been approved for first line treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression.

TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) is an anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibody, designed to directly bind to PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thereby blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors and thus enabling the activation of T cells. TECENTRIQ® was approved by the FDA in October 2016 for the treatment of patients with metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose disease progressed during or following Platinum-containing chemotherapy. AVASTIN® (Bevacizumab) is a biologic antiangiogenic antibody, directed against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), and prevents the interaction of VEGF to its receptors (Flt-1 and KDR) on the surface of endothelial cells. The interaction of VEGF with its receptors has been shown to result in endothelial cell proliferation and new blood vessel formation. Combining TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® is supported by the following scientific rationale. AVASTIN® in addition to its established anti-angiogenic effects, may further enhance the ability of TECENTRIQ® to restore anti-cancer immunity, by inhibiting VEGF-related immunosuppression, promoting T-cell tumor infiltration and enabling priming and activation of T-cell responses against tumor antigens.Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-PD-1-and-PD-L1-Antibodies

IMpower150 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TECENTRIQ® in combination with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel with or without AVASTIN®, in patients with stage IV, treatment naïve, non-squamous NSCLC. This study enrolled 1,202 patients, who were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either TECENTRIQ® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (Group A), TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® along with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (Group B), or AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (Group C – control arm). During the treatment-induction phase, patients in Group A received TECENTRIQ® 1200 mg IV along with Carboplatin AUC 6 and Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles. Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance treatment with TECENTRIQ® on the same dose schedule until disease progression. Patients in Group B received AVASTIN® 15 mg/kg IV, along with TECENTRIQ®, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel IV, Day 1 of a 3-week treatment cycle for 4 or 6 cycles followed by maintenance treatment with the TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® until disease progression. Patients in the control Group C received AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 4 or 6 cycles followed by AVASTIN® maintenance treatment until disease progression. Patients with tumors demonstrating ALK and EGFR mutations were excluded from the primary Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis. Patients were also tested for a tumor T-effector gene expression signature (based on phase II trial finding of prolonged Overall Survival in patients with high gene expression signature levels, treated with TECENTRIQ®). The median age was 63 years and the minimum follow up at the time of the analysis was 9.5 months. For the interim analysis, the study was only designed to compare Groups B and C. The co-Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival in the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population comparing patients in Group B and C. These end points were also evaluated in subgroup of people who had a specific biomarker (T-effector gene signature expression).

It was noted that at this interim analysis, the combination of TECENTRIQ® and AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel, significantly improved PFS and reduced the risk of disease worsening or death by 38% (HR=0.62; P<0.0001), compared to AVASTIN® plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel alone. This PFS benefit was observed across key subgroups, regardless of PD-L1 expression status, including PD-L1–negative patients (HR 0.77). Further, the median PFS in the population of patients with defined expression of a T-effector gene signature expression in the tumor tissue, was 11.3 months versus 6.8 months (HR 0.51; P<0.0001). Roche on March 26, 2018 announced that the IMpower150 study met its co-primary endpoint of Overall Survival as well. Details will soon become available.

It was concluded that combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents significantly improved PFS as well as Overall Survival, in patients with treatment naïve, advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This strategy can completely eliminate the need for patient selection based on a particular biomarker, and could benefit larger number of patients with advanced NSCLC. Reck M. Primary PFS and safety analyses of a randomized Phase III study of carboplatin + paclitaxel +/− bevacizumab, with or without atezolizumab in 1L non-squamous metastatic NSCLC (IMpower150). Annals of Oncology, 2017;28(11). Abstract LBA1_PR. https://www.roche.com/media/store/releases/med-cor-2018-03-26.htm

VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib)

RR

The FDA on February 26, 2018 approved VERZENIO® in combination with an Aromatase Inhibitor, as initial endocrine-based therapy for postmenopausal women with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. VERZENIO® is a product of Eli Lilly and Company.

IMFINZI® (Durvalumab)

RR

The FDA on February 16, 2018 approved IMFINZI® for patients with unresectable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC,) whose disease has not progressed following concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy. IMFINZI® is a product of AstraZeneca Inc.