Tag: Renal Cell Carcinoma

FDA Approves WELIREG® with KEYTRUDA® for Adjuvant Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on June 12, 2026, approved Belzutifan (WELIREG®) in combination with Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) or Pembrolizumab and Berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph (KEYTRUDA QLEX®) for the adjuvant treatment of adults with renal cell carcinoma with a clear cell component (ccRCC) at intermediate-high or high risk of recurrence following nephrectomy, or following nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions.

The American Cancer Society estimates that 80,450 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2026 and about 15,160 people will die from the disease. Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer and is about twice as common in men as in women. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five year survival of patients with advanced RCC is less than 10% and there is a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease.

Adjuvant immunotherapy has become an important component of treatment for patients with clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) who are at elevated risk for recurrence following nephrectomy. The role of adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade was established by the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study, which demonstrated that adjuvant Pembrolizumab significantly improves outcomes in this patient population.

Updated results from KEYNOTE-564 with a median follow-up of approximately 57 months confirmed a statistically significant Overall Survival (OS) benefit with adjuvant Pembrolizumab compared with placebo. Median OS was not reached in either group, but treatment with Pembrolizumab reduced the risk of death by 38% (HR 0.62; P=0.0024). At 48 months, the estimated OS rate was 91.2% among patients treated with Pembrolizumab versus 86.0% for those receiving placebo. The survival advantage was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with M0 disease, those with M1 disease rendered no evidence of disease (M1 NED), and across PD-L1 expression levels and sarcomatoid histology status.

Building upon these findings, investigators have explored whether combining immunotherapy with other targeted agents could further reduce recurrence risk. The Phase 3 LITESPARK-022 trial evaluated the addition of the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2α inhibitor Belzutifan to adjuvant Pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk ccRCC following surgery.

Study Design

LITESPARK-022 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial that enrolled 1,841 patients with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.

Eligible patients included those with:

  • Intermediate-to-high risk M0 disease
    • pT2 tumors with grade 4 or sarcomatoid features, N0
    • pT3 tumors of any grade, N0
  • High-risk M0 disease
    • pT4 tumors of any grade, N0
    • Any pT stage with nodal involvement (N+)
  • M1 NED disease
    • Patients with metastatic disease who had undergone surgery and achieved no radiographic evidence of disease

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan (N=921), Pembrolizumab plus placebo (N=920). Treatment consisted of Pembrolizumab 400 mg IV every 6 weeks for 9 cycles (approximately 1 year) and Belzutifan 120 mg orally once daily or placebo. Randomization was stratified according to risk category and tumor grade. The Primary endpoint was Disease-free survival (DFS) assessed by investigators and Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Safety and tolerability.

Results discussed here represent the first interim analysis, conducted after a median follow-up duration was 28.4 months. Treatment completion rates were similar between groups (about 70%).

Efficacy Outcomes

The addition of Belzutifan to Pembrolizumab resulted in a statistically significant improvement in Disease-Free Survival, compared to Pembrolizumab plus placebo, meeting the Primary endpoint of the study (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.59–0.87; P=0.0003. This corresponds to a 28% reduction in the risk of recurrence or death with the combination regimen. The Median DFS had not yet been reached in either arm at the time of analysis. The estimated 24-month DFS rates were 80.7% in the Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan group and 73.7% in the Pembrolizumab plus placebo group.

This represents the first Phase 3 adjuvant RCC trial demonstrating superiority of a combination therapy over active immunotherapy alone.

Overall Survival

Overall survival results remain immature. At the time of the interim analysis, only 29% of the events required for the final OS analysis had occurred, preventing definitive conclusions regarding survival benefit.

Safety Profile

As expected with the addition of Belzutifan, the combination regimen was associated with higher rates of treatment-related toxicity. Grade ≥3 Adverse Events for Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan combination was 52.1% versus 30.2% for the Pembrolizumab plus placebo group. The most frequently reported grade ≥3 events included Anemia (12.1% vs 0.4%), Elevated ALT (6.4% vs 2.0%) and Hypoxia (4.6% vs 0%). Despite increased toxicity, grade 5 adverse events were rare and similar between arms, and no new safety signals were identified.

Clinical Implications

The findings from LITESPARK-022 suggest that combining Belzutifan with Pembrolizumab may further improve outcomes for patients with high-risk ccRCC following nephrectomy. However, the improved DFS must be balanced against the increased toxicity profile. Experts emphasize that careful patient selection will be essential if this regimen is adopted in clinical practice. Patients with baseline pulmonary or cardiovascular comorbidities, who may be more vulnerable to Belzutifan-associated hypoxia or anemia, may require additional consideration.

Furthermore, longer follow-up will be necessary to determine whether overall survival benefit emerges, as well as the impact on quality of life, and long-term safety of the combination regimen.

Key Takeaways for Clinical Practice

  • Adjuvant Pembrolizumab remains a standard of care for patients with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence following nephrectomy.
  • The LITESPARK-022 trial demonstrated a significant improvement in DFS when Belzutifan was added to Pembrolizumab.
  • The combination reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 28% compared with Pembrolizumab alone.
  • Toxicity was higher, particularly with respect to anemia and hypoxia, but was generally manageable with dose modification and supportive care.
  • Ongoing follow-up will determine whether Overall Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes support broader adoption of this strategy.

Conclusion

The Phase 3 LITESPARK-022 trial represents an important step forward in the adjuvant treatment landscape for clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. By demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement in Disease-Free Survival with the addition of Belzutifan to Pembrolizumab, the study introduces a promising new therapeutic approach for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Continued follow-up will clarify the long-term survival benefit and help define the role of this combination in routine clinical practice.

Adjuvant pembrolizumab plus belzutifan versus pembrolizumab for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): The randomized phase 3 LITESPARK-022 study. Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Karam JA, et al. 2026 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. J Clin Oncol 44, 2026 (suppl 7; abstr LBA418)

CheckMate-9ER primary and exploratory findings: baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes, including depth and durability of response with cabozantinib plus nivolumab

RR

CheckMate-9ER primary and exploratory findings: baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes, including depth and durability of response with cabozantinib plus nivolumab

Written by Dr Manojkumar Bupathi
Sponsored by Exelixis, Inc.

Baseline disease characteristics and tumor biology play a pivotal role in shaping outcomes for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). As treatment paradigms have evolved toward combination strategies, it has become increasingly important not only to demonstrate efficacy in the overall population, but also to consider the potential for the depth, durability, and consistency of responses across clinically relevant subgroups.1,2

The Phase 3 CheckMate-9ER trial established cabozantinib plus nivolumab as a first-line option for patients with aRCC, demonstrating significant improvements in progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with sunitinib. However, beyond these pivotal results, additional insights from descriptive analyses on long-term outcomes and response characteristics are noteworthy to help inform real-world clinical decision-making.3

In this article, we review the key findings from the CheckMate-9ER trial, including updated 5-year follow-up data, and explore post hoc analyses evaluating baseline characteristics associated with response. In particular, we focus on patients achieving complete responses and examine the depth and durability of response to better contextualize the long-term clinical data observed with cabozantinib plus nivolumab.1,4,5

Overview of CheckMate‐9ER
Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, targeting MET, AXL, and VEGFR. Based on the results from the CheckMate-9ER trial, a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, head-to-head trial versus sunitinib, cabozantinib + nivolumab was approved for patients with previously untreated aRCC.3,4

We will begin by reviewing the results from the pivotal trial CheckMate-9ER, which enrolled 651 patients with previously untreated aRCC containing a clear-cell component. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib 40 mg once daily plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks, or sunitinib 50 mg once daily administered on a 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off schedule.3,4

  • Endpoints assessed3:
    • Primary endpoint: PFS*
    • Secondary endpoints: OS, ORR*, and safety

*Assessed by BICR.4

CheckMate-9ER studied a broad patient population, including those with a high burden of disease. Select baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1 for the cabozantinib + nivolumab arm.3

Table 13

Renal-Cell-Carcinoma-IMDC-Risk

 

†Data are for tumor sites defined at baseline by the investigators according to RECIST v1.1. The number of target or nontarget lesions at baseline was not reported for 1 patient in the CABOMETYX + OPDIVO group and for 3 patients in the sunitinib group.3

Results in the CheckMate-9ER primary analysis of the intent-to-treat population (median follow-up of 18.1 months; range: 10.6-30.6 months) were as follows3:

  • Median PFS* (mPFS) was 16.6 months with cabozantinib + nivolumab (95% CI: 12.5-24.9) vs 8.3 months  with sunitinib (95% CI: 7.0-9.7) (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.41-0.64; P<0.0001)4,6
  • Median OS (mOS) was not reached in either arm (HR=0.60; 98.89% CI: 0.40-0.89; P=0.001)4,6
    • Pre-planned final analysis (median follow-up: 32.9 months; range: 25.4-45.4 months): mOS was 37.7 months for the combination (95% Cl: 35.5-NR) vs 34.3 months with sunitinib (95% Cl: 29.0-NR) (HR=0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.90)
  • ORR* was 55.7% (95% CI: 50.1-61.2) with the combination vs 27.1% with sunitinib (95% CI: 22.4-32.3; P<0.0001)4,6
    • Complete response (CR) was 8% (n=26/323) for the combination arm vs 4.6% (n=15/328) with sunitinib
    • Partial response (PR) was 48% (n=154/323) for the combination arm vs
      23% (n=74/328) with sunitinib
  • Serious adverse reactions occurred in 48% of patients receiving cabozantinib + nivolumab (n=320). The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in ≥2% of patients were diarrhea, pneumonia, pneumonitis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and hyponatremia. Fatal intestinal perforations occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients4
  • The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were diarrhea (64%), fatigue (51%), hepatotoxicity (44%), palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (40%), stomatitis (37%), rash (36%), hypertension (36%), hypothyroidism (34%), musculoskeletal pain (33%), decreased appetite (28%), nausea (27%), dysgeusia (24%), abdominal pain (22%), upper respiratory tract infection (20%), and cough (20%)4

The results of the CheckMate-9ER 5-year follow-up analysis (median follow-up of 67.6 months; range 60.2-80.2 months) were as follows. No formal statistical testing was conducted at the time of the updated analysis5:

  • mPFS* was 16.4 months with the combination (95% CI: 12.5-19.3) vs 8.3 months with sunitinib (95% CI: 7.0-9.7) (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.49-0.70)
  • mOS was 46.5 months with the combination (95% CI: 40.6-53.8) vs 35.5 months with sunitinib (95% CI: 29.2-42.8) (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96)
  • ORR* was 55.7% (95% CI: 50.1-61.2) for the combination arm vs 27.4% with sunitinib (95% CI: 22.7-32.6)
    • CR was 13.9% (n=45/323) for the combination arm vs 4.6% (n=15/328)
      with sunitinib
    • PR was 41.8% (n=135/323) for the combination arm vs 22.9% (n=75/328)
      with sunitinib
  • Safety and tolerability were similar to previous follow-ups

*Assessed by BICR.4

To further explore long-term data from the CheckMate-9ER trial, post hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate the baseline characteristics of patients who achieved CR, assess depth of response (DepOR) among those patients with PR, and examine the duration of response in patients with CR or PR.1

Depth and durability of response in patients treated with cabozantinib + nivolumab
The exploratory, post hoc analyses of the 5-year CheckMate-9ER data evaluated depth and durability of response in patients randomized to cabozantinib + nivolumab who were alive 6 months after randomization and who had available data for best overall response (BOR) and sum of diameters of target lesions.1

  • Of the 323 patients randomized to cabozantinib + nivolumab, 293 were alive at the
    6-month landmark
  • Patients were categorized into DepOR subgroups based on BOR per BICR using the maximum tumor reduction observed at any time during the study period

Baseline demographic and disease characteristics of patients receiving cabozantinib + nivolumab by DepOR subgroup are shown in Table 2, which includes patients with characteristics associated with poor prognosis.1

Table 21,7

Characteristics-Demographics

 

  • Among patients who achieved CR (n=45), the median duration of response was not reached at the time of analysis (95% CI: 30.5-NE)1*
  • Among patients who achieved PR (n=135), the median duration of response was 17.3 months (95% CI: 13.8-20.7)7*
  • Median duration of treatment with cabozantinib + nivolumab was 30.4 months for patients achieving CR, over 2 years for those with PR, and 15.3 months for those with stable disease (SD)1*
  • Safety was similar across all subgroups achieving an objective response, and the most frequently reported Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events included hypertension (13%), diarrhea (9%), hyponatremia (8%), and PPE (8%)1

These post hoc exploratory analyses are descriptive in nature. No statistical procedure was employed. Results should be considered hypothesis generating.

*Patients who were alive at the 6-month timepoint.1,7

Discussion
In the primary analysis cabozantinib + nivolumab doubled mPFS and demonstrated superior efficacy vs sunitinib across OS and ORR.4 Building on these results, the primary results and exploratory analyses from CheckMate-9ER provide additional context to the established efficacy of cabozantinib + nivolumab in the first-line treatment of aRCC.1,4 Notably, meaningful responses were observed among patients with baseline features traditionally associated with poorer prognosis, underscoring the broad applicability of this combination.1

The median duration of response was not reached among patients achieving complete response. The durability of responses and extended treatment exposure did not appear to be associated with a disproportionate increase in toxicity.1

These findings are derived from post hoc, descriptive exploratory analyses and should be interpreted with caution. Collectively, these data help refine our understanding of which patients may derive the greatest response and further support the role of cabozantinib + nivolumab combination as a first-line therapy option in aRCC.1

Dr Manojkumar Bupathi received a fee for participating in the development of this article, and his comments reflect his opinions and are not intended to constitute medical advice for individual patients.

AXL=AXL receptor tyrosine kinase; BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; IMDC=International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium; MET=hepatocyte growth factor receptor; NE=not estimable; NR=not reported; ORR=objective response rate; OS=overall survival; PD=progressive disease; PFS=progression-free survival; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; VEGFR=vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

INDICATION
CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib), in combination with nivolumab, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Hemorrhage: CABOMETYX can cause severe and fatal hemorrhages. The incidence of Grade 3-5 hemorrhagic events was 5% in CABOMETYX patients in RCC, HCC, and DTC studies. Discontinue CABOMETYX for Grade 3-4 hemorrhage and before surgery. Do not administer to patients who have a recent history of hemorrhage, including hemoptysis, hematemesis, or melena.

Perforations and Fistulas: Fistulas, including fatal cases, and gastrointestinal (GI) perforations, including fatal cases, each occurred in 1% of CABOMETYX patients. Monitor for signs and symptoms, and discontinue CABOMETYX in patients with Grade 4 fistulas or GI perforation.

Thromboembolic Events: CABOMETYX can cause arterial or venous thromboembolic events. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 7% (including 4% pulmonary embolism) and arterial thromboembolism in 2% of CABOMETYX patients. Fatal thrombotic events have occurred. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop an acute myocardial infarction or serious arterial or venous thromboembolic events.

Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis: CABOMETYX can cause hypertension, including hypertensive crisis. Hypertension was reported in 37% (16% Grade 3 and <1% Grade 4) of CABOMETYX patients. In CABINET (n=195), hypertension occurred in 65% (26% Grade 3) of CABOMETYX patients. Do not initiate CABOMETYX in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Monitor blood pressure regularly during CABOMETYX treatment. Withhold CABOMETYX for hypertension that is not adequately controlled; when controlled, resume at a reduced dose. Permanently discontinue CABOMETYX for severe hypertension that cannot be controlled with antihypertensive therapy or for hypertensive crisis.

Cardiac Failure: CABOMETYX can cause severe and fatal cardiac failure. Cardiac failure occurred in 0.5% of patients treated with CABOMETYX as a single agent, including fatal cardiac failure in 0.1% of patients. Consider baseline and periodic evaluations of left ventricular ejection fraction. Monitor for signs and symptoms of cardiovascular events. Withhold and resume at a reduced dose upon recovery or permanently discontinue depending on the severity.

Diarrhea: CABOMETYX can cause diarrhea and it occurred in 62% (10% Grade 3) of treated patients. Monitor and manage patients using antidiarrheals as indicated. Withhold CABOMETYX until improvement to ≤ Grade 1; resume at a reduced dose.

Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE): CABOMETYX can cause PPE and it occurred in 45% of treated patients (13% Grade 3). Withhold CABOMETYX until PPE resolves or decreases to
Grade 1 and resume at a reduced dose for intolerable Grade 2 PPE or Grade 3 PPE.

Hepatotoxicity: CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab in RCC can cause hepatic toxicity with higher frequencies of Grades 3 and 4 ALT and AST elevations compared to CABOMETYX alone. With the combination of CABOMETYX and nivolumab, Grades 3 and 4 increased ALT or AST were seen in 11% of patients. Monitor liver enzymes before initiation of treatment and periodically. Consider more frequent monitoring as compared to when the drugs are administered as single agents. Consider withholding CABOMETYX and/or nivolumab, initiating corticosteroid therapy, and/or permanently discontinuing the combination for severe or
life-threatening hepatotoxicity.

Adrenal Insufficiency: CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency. Adrenal insufficiency occurred in 4.7% (15/320) of patients with RCC who received CABOMETYX with nivolumab, including Grade 3 (2.2%), and Grade 2 (1.9%) adverse reactions. Withhold CABOMETYX and/or nivolumab and resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose depending on severity.

Proteinuria: Proteinuria was observed in 8% of CABOMETYX patients. Monitor urine protein regularly during CABOMETYX treatment. For Grade 2 or 3 proteinuria, withhold CABOMETYX until improvement to ≤ Grade 1 proteinuria; resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop nephrotic syndrome.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ): CABOMETYX can cause ONJ and it occurred in <1% of treated patients. Perform an oral examination prior to CABOMETYX initiation and periodically during treatment. Advise patients regarding good oral hygiene practices. Withhold CABOMETYX for at least 3 weeks prior to scheduled dental surgery or invasive dental procedures. Withhold CABOMETYX for development of ONJ until complete resolution; resume at a reduced dose.

Impaired Wound Healing: CABOMETYX can cause impaired wound healing. Withhold CABOMETYX for at least 3 weeks prior to elective surgery. Do not administer for at least 2 weeks after major surgery and until adequate wound healing. The safety of resumption of CABOMETYX after resolution of wound healing complications has not been established.

Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS): CABOMETYX can cause RPLS. Perform evaluation for RPLS and diagnose by characteristic finding on MRI any patient presenting with seizures, headache, visual disturbances, confusion, or altered mental function. Discontinue CABOMETYX in patients who develop RPLS.

Thyroid Dysfunction: CABOMETYX can cause thyroid dysfunction, primarily hypothyroidism, and it occurred in 19% of treated patients (0.4% Grade 3). Assess for signs of thyroid dysfunction prior to the initiation of CABOMETYX and monitor for signs and symptoms during treatment.

Hypocalcemia: CABOMETYX can cause hypocalcemia, with the highest incidence in DTC patients. Based on the safety population, hypocalcemia occurred in 13% of CABOMETYX patients (2% Grade 3 and 1% Grade 4).
Monitor blood calcium levels and replace calcium as necessary during treatment. Withhold and resume CABOMETYX at a reduced dose upon recovery or permanently discontinue CABOMETYX depending on severity.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: CABOMETYX can cause fetal harm. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus and advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with CABOMETYX and for 4 months after the last dose.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions are:
CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab: diarrhea, fatigue, hepatotoxicity, PPE, stomatitis, rash, hypertension, hypothyroidism, musculoskeletal pain, decreased appetite, nausea, dysgeusia, abdominal pain, cough, and upper respiratory tract infection.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors: If coadministration with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors cannot be avoided, reduce the CABOMETYX dosage. Avoid grapefruit or grapefruit juice.

Strong or Moderate CYP3A4 Inducers: If coadministration with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers cannot be avoided, increase the CABOMETYX dosage. Avoid St. John’s wort.

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Lactation: Advise women not to breastfeed during CABOMETYX treatment and for 4 months after the final dose.

Hepatic Impairment: In patients with moderate hepatic impairment, reduce the CABOMETYX dosage. Avoid CABOMETYX in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information by clicking here.

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.FDA.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088.

 References

  1. Suárez C, Motzer RJ, Powles T, et al. Characterization of depth and durability of response in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma who received cabozantinib plus nivolumab: long-term follow-up and exploratory analysis of CheckMate 9ER. Poster Presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. February 26-28, 2026.
  2. Zarrabi KK, Lanade O, Geynisman DM. Determining front-line therapeutic strategy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancers. 2022;14;4607. doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194607.
  3. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, et al; CheckMate 9ER Investigators. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal‐cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(9):829‐841.
  4. CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) Prescribing Information. Exelixis, Inc.
  5. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Burotto M, et al. Final analysis of nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma from the randomized phase III CheckMate 9ER trial. Ann Oncol. 2025; Published online September 23, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.09.006.
  6. Powles T, Choueiri TK, Burotto M, et al. Final overall survival analysis and organ-specific target lesion assessments with 2-year follow-up in CheckMate 9ER: nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; February 17-19, 2022.
  7. Data on file. Exelixis, Inc.

©2026 Exelixis, Inc.    CA-3913    04/26
OPDIVO® and the related logo are registered trademarks of Bristol‐Myers Squibb Company.

Late Breaking Abstract – 2026 ASCO GU Symposium: Advancing Adjuvant Therapy in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 80,450 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2026 and about 15,160 people will die from the disease. Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer and is about twice as common in men as in women. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five year survival of patients with advanced RCC is less than 10% and there is a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease.

Adjuvant immunotherapy has become an important component of treatment for patients with clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) who are at elevated risk for recurrence following nephrectomy. The role of adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade was established by the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study, which demonstrated that adjuvant Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) significantly improves outcomes in this patient population.

Updated results from KEYNOTE-564 with a median follow-up of approximately 57 months confirmed a statistically significant Overall Survival (OS) benefit with adjuvant Pembrolizumab compared with placebo. Median OS was not reached in either group, but treatment with Pembrolizumab reduced the risk of death by 38% (HR 0.62; P=0.0024). At 48 months, the estimated OS rate was 91.2% among patients treated with Pembrolizumab versus 86.0% for those receiving placebo. The survival advantage was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with M0 disease, those with M1 disease rendered no evidence of disease (M1 NED), and across PD-L1 expression levels and sarcomatoid histology status.

Building upon these findings, investigators have explored whether combining immunotherapy with other targeted agents could further reduce recurrence risk. The Phase 3 LITESPARK-022 trial evaluated the addition of the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2α inhibitor Belzutifan (WELIREG®) to adjuvant Pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk ccRCC following surgery.

Study Design

LITESPARK-022 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial that enrolled 1,841 patients with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.

Eligible patients included those with:

  • Intermediate-to-high risk M0 disease
    • pT2 tumors with grade 4 or sarcomatoid features, N0
    • pT3 tumors of any grade, N0
  • High-risk M0 disease
    • pT4 tumors of any grade, N0
    • Any pT stage with nodal involvement (N+)
  • M1 NED disease
    • Patients with metastatic disease who had undergone surgery and achieved no radiographic evidence of disease

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan (N=921), Pembrolizumab plus placebo (N=920). Treatment consisted of Pembrolizumab 400 mg IV every 6 weeks for 9 cycles (approximately 1 year) and Belzutifan 120 mg orally once daily or placebo. Randomization was stratified according to risk category and tumor grade. The Primary endpoint was Disease-free survival (DFS) assessed by investigators and Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Safety and tolerability.

Results discussed here represent the first interim analysis, conducted after a median follow-up duration was 28.4 months. Treatment completion rates were similar between groups (about 70%)

Efficacy Outcomes

The addition of Belzutifan to Pembrolizumab resulted in a statistically significant improvement in Disease-Free Survival, compared to Pembrolizumab plus placebo, meeting the Primary endpoint of the study (HR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.59–0.87; P=0.0003. This corresponds to a 28% reduction in the risk of recurrence or death with the combination regimen. The Median DFS had not yet been reached in either arm at the time of analysis. The estimated 24-month DFS rates were 80.7% in the Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan group and 73.7% in the Pembrolizumab plus placebo group.

This represents the first Phase 3 adjuvant RCC trial demonstrating superiority of a combination therapy over active immunotherapy alone.

Overall Survival

Overall survival results remain immature. At the time of the interim analysis, only 29% of the events required for the final OS analysis had occurred, preventing definitive conclusions regarding survival benefit.

Safety Profile

As expected with the addition of Belzutifan, the combination regimen was associated with higher rates of treatment-related toxicity. Grade ≥3 Adverse Events for Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan combination was 52.1% versus 30.2% for the Pembrolizumab plus placebo group. The most frequently reported grade ≥3 events included Anemia (12.1% vs 0.4%), Elevated ALT (6.4% vs 2.0%) and Hypoxia (4.6% vs 0%). Despite increased toxicity, grade 5 adverse events were rare and similar between arms, and no new safety signals were identified.

Clinical Implications

The findings from LITESPARK-022 suggest that combining Belzutifan with Pembrolizumab may further improve outcomes for patients with high-risk ccRCC following nephrectomy. However, the improved DFS must be balanced against the increased toxicity profile. Experts emphasize that careful patient selection will be essential if this regimen is adopted in clinical practice. Patients with baseline pulmonary or cardiovascular comorbidities, who may be more vulnerable to Belzutifan-associated hypoxia or anemia, may require additional consideration.

Furthermore, longer follow-up will be necessary to determine whether overall survival benefit emerges, as well as the impact on quality of life, and long-term safety of the combination regimen

Key Takeaways for Clinical Practice

  • Adjuvant Pembrolizumab remains a standard of care for patients with ccRCC at increased risk of recurrence following nephrectomy.
  • The LITESPARK-022 trial demonstrated a significant improvement in DFS when Belzutifan was added to Pembrolizumab.
  • The combination reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 28% compared with Pembrolizumab alone.
  • Toxicity was higher, particularly with respect to anemia and hypoxia, but was generally manageable with dose modification and supportive care.
  • Ongoing follow-up will determine whether Overall Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes support broader adoption of this strategy.

Conclusion

The Phase 3 LITESPARK-022 trial represents an important step forward in the adjuvant treatment landscape for clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. By demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement in Disease-Free Survival with the addition of Belzutifan to Pembrolizumab, the study introduces a promising new therapeutic approach for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Continued follow-up will clarify the long-term survival benefit and help define the role of this combination in routine clinical practice.

Adjuvant pembrolizumab plus belzutifan versus pembrolizumab for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): The randomized phase 3 LITESPARK-022 study. Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Karam JA, et al. 2026 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. J Clin Oncol 44, 2026 (suppl 7; abstr LBA418)

Late Breaking Abstract – 2024 ASCO GU Cancers Symposium: Adjuvant KEYTRUDA® Improves Overall Survival in Renal cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 81,610 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2024 and about 14,390 people will die from the disease. Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer and is about twice as common in men as in women. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five year survival of patients with advanced RCC is less than 10% and there is a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease.

The prognosis for patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is dependent on the stage of disease and risk factors. Two validated models, the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) score were developed, to assess the risk for relapse. UISS is based on ECOG Performance Status, Fuhrman nuclear grading and TNM pathological stage, whereas the SSIGN score takes Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis into consideration. Approximately 16% of patients with RCC present with Locoregional disease, and up to 40% of these patients relapse with metastatic disease, following nephrectomy. The 5-year survival for locoregional (Stage III) disease is 53%, and 8% for metastatic disease. The standard management of high risk patients following nephrectomy has been surveillance, as there has been limited data demonstrating the benefit of adjuvant therapy in reducing the risk of relapse. Adjuvant therapy with immune check point inhibitors therapy is a potentially attractive treatment strategy for this patient group.

KEYNOTE-564 is a multicenter, double-blind, Phase III trial in which the benefit of adjuvant therapy with KEYTRUDA® was compared with placebo, following nephrectomy, in patients with clear cell RCC. In this study, 994 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either KEYTRUDA® or placebo at least 12 weeks after surgery. Enrolled patients had histologically confirmed clear cell RCC, with Intermediate-High risk (pT2, Grade 4 or Sarcomatoid, N0 M0; or pT3, any Grade, N0 M0), High risk (pT4, any Grade, N0 M0; or pT any Stage, any Grade, N+ M0), or M1 with No Evidence of Disease (NED) after primary tumor and soft tissue metastases were completely resected, 1 year or less from nephrectomy. Treatment consisted of KEYTRUDA® 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (N=496) or placebo (N=498), every 3 weeks, for approximately 1 year. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The Primary end point of the trial was Disease Free Survival (DFS) assessment in all randomized patients and Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS) and Safety.

The Primary endpoint of DFS was met at the first prespecified interim analysis, with a median follow up of 24.1 months. The median DFS was not reached for both treatment groups. KEYTRUDA® reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 32% compared with placebo, and this difference was statistically significant (HR=0.68; P=0.0010). Survival data were not mature at that time, and additional follow up was planned for OS. Based on this data, the FDA in November 2021 approved KEYTRUDA® for the adjuvant treatment of patients with RCC.

In this updated analysis, at a median follow up of approximately 57 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in OS with KEYTRUDA®, compared to placebo (medians not reached, HR=0.62, P=.0024). This represented a 38% reduction in the risk of death for patients receiving KEYTRUDA®, and at the 48-month mark, the estimated OS rate was 91.2% for the KEYTRUDA® group compared to 86.0% for the placebo group. The OS benefit was observed across key subgroups, including in patients with M0 disease, or M1 NED, patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 1 or CPS 1 or more, and with presence or absence of sarcomatoid features. The observed DFS benefit with KEYTRUDA® versus placebo was consistent with prior interim analyses. No new safety signals were observed.

It was concluded, that after a median of about 57 months of follow up, KEYTRUDA® demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in Overall Survival compared to placebo, in patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma, at a high risk of recurrence following surgery. The authors added that this is the first positive Phase III study with a checkpoint inhibitor to demonstrate survival benefit in adjuvant Renal Cell Carcinoma, and these practice changing results support KEYTRUDA® as a new standard of care for this patient group. Studies are underway exploring the potential of combining KEYTRUDA® with other agents, such as the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2 (HIF-2) inhibitor Belzutifan, to further optimize treatment outcomes for patients with clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Overall survival results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, et al.Journal of Clinical Oncology 42(4_suppl):LBA359. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.LBA359.

Late Breaking Abstract – 2024 ASCO GU Cancers Symposium: Subcutaneous Nivolumab Offers Efficiency and Efficacy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 81,610 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2024 and about 14,390 people will die from the disease. Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer and is about twice as common in men as in women. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five year survival of patients with advanced RCC is less than 10% and there is a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease.

OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2. Blocking the Immune checkpoint proteins unleashes the T cells, resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. The emergence of immunotherapy has offered new avenues for patients, with Nivolumab demonstrating efficacy across various tumor types. However, the conventional Intravenous (IV) administration of Nivolumab has been associated with significant treatment burden, prompting the exploration of alternative delivery methods. The CheckMate 67T trial aimed to address this challenge by assessing the efficacy and convenience of Subcutaneous (SC) Nivolumab compared to its IV counterpart.

The CheckMate 67T trial is an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III study, conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous versus Intravenous delivery of Nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). In this study, a total of 495 patients (N=495) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Nivolumab 1200 mg SC plus recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 every 4 weeks (N=248), or Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (N=247), until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or completion of 2 years of treatment. The median age was 65 years, 67% were men and enrolled patients had measurable disease that progressed during or after 1–2 prior systemic regimens, had no prior immunotherapy treatment, and had a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70 or more. Hispanic patients accounted for at least 34% of study participants in both treatment arms, ensuring diverse representation.

The Primary objective of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of SC versus IV delivery of Nivolumab, which included whether blood levels of the drug were comparable in the two groups over time and whether SC Nivolumab was noninferior to IV Nivolumab. The daily average concentration of the drug in the blood over 28 days and the concentration of the drug at the end of the dosing cycle were measured. Key Secondary endpoint included Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR).

The trial revealed compelling findings, indicating that SC Nivolumab not only matched the pharmacokinetic profile (noninferior) and Objective Response Rate of IV Nivolumab, but also drastically reduced administration time. The ORR for the Subcutaneous group was noninferior to the Intravenous group, at 24.2% versus 18.2%, respectively. The Median Progression Free Survival stood was 7.23 months for the Subcutaneous group versus 5.65 months for the IV group. The median treatment duration was under 5 minutes for the Subcutaneous group, in contrast to the 30-minute infusion sessions required for IV therapy. Local injection site reactions occurred in 8.1% of patients. Reactions were low grade and transient and most deaths were due to disease progression.

It was concluded that Subcutaneous Nivolumab showed comparable pharmacokinetic profile and Overall Response Rates (ORR) compared to Intravenous Nivolumab, in addition to significant reduction in administration time. With over 20 FDA-approved indications for Nivolumab, the convenience of Subcutaneous administration and its potential impact extends far beyond Renal Cell Carcinoma, promising greater accessibility and streamlined treatment experiences for patients nationwide. By alleviating treatment burdens and enhancing efficiency, this innovative formulation heralds a new era in oncology, offering hope to patients and clinicians alike.

Subcutaneous nivolumab (NIVO SC) vs intravenous nivolumab (NIVO IV) in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety results from CheckMate 67T. George S, Bourlon MT, Chacon MR, et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology. Volume 42, Number 4_suppl. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.LBA360.

FDA Approves WELIREG® for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on December 14, 2023, approved Belzutifan (WELIREG®) for patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) following a Programmed Death receptor-1 (PD-1) or Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor and a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (VEGF-TKI). The American Cancer Society estimates that 81,800 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2023 and about 14,890 people will die from this disease. Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five-year survival of patients with advanced RCC is about 14% and there is a significant need for improved therapies for this disease.

Patients with advanced RCC are often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, either in combination or sequentially. However upon progression on these therapies, there are limited treatment options and there is an unmet medical need.

The VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau) protein is a tumor suppressor gene located on the short arm of chromosome 3p. It is frequently mutated and inactivated in approximately 90% of clear cell Renal Cell Carcinomas (ccRCC). The VHL gene under normal conditions binds to Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) and facilitates degradation of this factor. Under hypoxic conditions and in patients having biallelic loss of function and mutation of VHL genes, HIFs are not degraded. High HIF levels and subsequent overproduction of VEGF, PDGF and TGF-alpha, resulting in increased angiogenesis, increased tumor cell proliferation and survival, as well as metastasis.

Belzutifan (WELIREG®) is a a first-in-class, oral, HIF-2alfa inhibitor approved in the US for adult patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease who require therapy for associated Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemangioblastomas, or Pancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (pNET), not requiring immediate surgery. This approval was based on the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) data from the Phase II LITESPARK-004 trial.

The present FDA approval was based on LITESPARK-005, which is a randomized, open-label, Phase III trial, in which Belzutifan was compared with Everolimus in pretreated advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). In this study, 746 enrolled patients with metastatic clear cell RCC whose disease progressed after treatment with both an immune checkpoint inhibitor, such as a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, and VEGF-TKI, in sequence or in combination, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either Belzutifan 120 mg orally daily (N=374) or Everolimus 10 mg orally daily (N=372), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BICR and Safety.

At the first pre-specified interim analysis at a median follow up of 18.4 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 25% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.75; P<0.001). The results at the second pre-specified interim analysis were consistent with first interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 25.7 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 26% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.74; P<0.001). The estimated 12-month PFS rate was 33.7% for patients who received Belzutifan versus 17.6% for patients who received Everolimus, and the estimated 18-month PFS rate was 22.5% and 9.0%, respectively. The Overall Survival data favored Belzutifan compared to Everolimus at both the first and second interim analysis, but did not reach statistical significance and will be tested at a subsequent analysis.

There was a statistically significant improvement in ORR at both the first and second interim analysis, and the ORR was 22.7% with a Complete Response rate 3.5% for patients who received Belzutifan versus an ORR of 3.5% with no patients achieving a Complete Response for patients who received Everolimus (P<0.00001). The time to response with Belzutifan was about three months. Quality of Life favored Belzutifan.

Treatment-related adverse events and in particular Grade 3 adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 5.9% of patients who received Belzutifan and 14.7% among those who received Everolimus. The most common side effects associated with Belzutifan were anemia, fatigue, nausea, constipation, peripheral edema, dyspnea and arthralgia.

It was concluded that Belzutifan was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Progression Free Survival and Overall Response Rate compared to Everolimus in patients with advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, after immune checkpoint and anti-angiogenic therapies. They added that this is the first Phase III trial to show positive results in advanced RCC following standard therapies and the first drug with a new mechanism of action to demonstrate efficacy in this group of patients.

Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Randomized open-label phase III LITESPARK-005 study. Albiges L, Rini BI, Peltola K, et al. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.090. LBA88

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2023: WELIREG® Significantly Improves Outcomes in Advanced Pretreated Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 81,800 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2023 and about 14,890 people will die from this disease. Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five-year survival of patients with advanced RCC is about 14% and there is a significant need for improved therapies for this disease.

Patients with advanced RCC are often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, either in combination or sequentially. However upon progression on these therapies, there are limited treatment options and there is an unmet medical need.

The VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau) protein is a tumor suppressor gene located on the short arm of chromosome 3p. It is frequently mutated and inactivated in approximately 90% of clear cell Renal Cell Carcinomas (ccRCC). The VHL gene under normal conditions binds to Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) and facilitates degradation of this factor. Under hypoxic conditions and in patients having biallelic loss of function and mutation of VHL genes, HIFs are not degraded. High HIF levels and subsequent overproduction of VEGF, PDGF and TGF-alpha, resulting in increased angiogenesis, increased tumor cell proliferation and survival, as well as metastasis.

Belzutifan (WELIREG®) is a a first-in-class, oral, HIF-2alfa inhibitor approved in the US for adult patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease who require therapy for associated Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemangioblastomas, or Pancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (pNET), not requiring immediate surgery. This approval was based on the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) data from the Phase II LITESPARK-004 trial.

LITESPARK-005 is a randomized, open-label, Phase III trial in which Belzutifan was compared with Everolimus in pretreated advanced ccRCC. In this study, 746 enrolled patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma whose disease progressed after treatment with both an immune checkpoint inhibitor, such as a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor, and VEGF-TKI, in sequence or in combination, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either Belzutifan 120 mg orally daily (N=374) or Everolimus 10 mg orally daily (N=372), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BICR and Safety.

At the first pre-specified interim analysis at a median follow up of 18.4 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 25% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.75; P<0.001). The results at the second pre-specified interim analysis were consistent with first interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 25.7 months, Belzutifan significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 26% compared to Everolimus (HR=0.74; P<0.001). The estimated 12-month PFS rate was 33.7% for patients who received Belzutifan versus 17.6% for patients who received Everolimus, and the estimated 18-month PFS rate was 22.5% and 9.0%, respectively. The Overall Survival data favored Belzutifan compared to Everolimus at both the first and second interim analysis, but did not reach statistical significance and will be tested at a subsequent analysis.

There was a statistically significant improvement in ORR at both the first and second interim analysis, and the ORR was 22.7% with a Complete Response rate 3.5% for patients who received Belzutifan versus an ORR of 3.5% with no patients achieving a Complete Response for patients who received Everolimus (P<0.00001). The time to response with Belzutifan was about three months. Quality of Life favored Belzutifan.

Treatment-related adverse events and in particular Grade 3 adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 5.9% of patients who received Belzutifan and 14.7% among those who received Everolimus. The most common side effects associated with Belzutifan were anemia, fatigue, nausea, constipation, peripheral edema, dyspnea and arthralgia.

It was concluded that Belzutifan was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Progression Free Survival and Overall Response Rate compared to Everolimus in patients with advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, after immune checkpoint and anti-angiogenic therapies. They added that this is the first Phase III trial to show positive results in advanced RCC following standard therapies and the first drug with a new mechanism of action to demonstrate efficacy in this group of patients.

Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Randomized open-label phase III LITESPARK-005 study. Albiges L, Rini BI, Peltola K, et al. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.090. LBA88

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2022: CABOMETYX®, OPDIVO® and YERVOY® in Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 79,000 new cases of kidney cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2022 and about 13,920 people will die from this disease. Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five-year survival of patients with advanced RCC is about 14% and there is a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease.

OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, whereas YERVOY® (Ipilimumab) is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks Immune checkpoint protein/receptor CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152). Blocking the Immune checkpoint proteins unleashes the T cells, resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. The FDA in 2018, granted approvals to OPDIVO® and YERVOY® in combination, for the treatment of Intermediate or Poor-risk, previously untreated advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

CABOMETYX® (Cabozantinib) is an oral, small-molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), which targets Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors (VEGFR), as well as tyrosine kinases MET and AXL. Both MET and AXL are upregulated in Renal Cell Carcinoma as a consequence of VHL inactivation, and increased expression of MET and AXL is associated with tumor progression and development of resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Further, CABOMETYX® promotes an immune-permissive environment, which may enhance response to checkpoint inhibitors. CABOMETYX® was approved by the FDA in 2016 for the treatment of advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

COSMIC-313 is a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, ongoing Phase III pivotal trial, conducted to evaluate the triplet combination of Cabozantinib, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab versus the doublet combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, in patients with previously untreated advanced Intermediate or Poor-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma. COSMIC-313 was designed to answer whether adding Cabozantinib to dual checkpoint inhibition can improve outcomes among patients with Intermediate and Poor-risk advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

In this trial, 855 treatment naïve, advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma patients of IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) Intermediate or Poor risk were randomized 1:1 to receive Cabozantinib plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (N=428) or placebo plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (N=427). Patients in the study group received Cabozantinib 40 mg, orally once daily in combination with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV and Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks for 4 doses total followed by Cabozantinib 40 mg orally once daily and Nivolumab 480 mg/kg flat dose IV, once every 4 weeks for up to 2 years. Patients in the control group received the same regimen, but instead of Cabozantinib, received a matched placebo. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 60 years, 75% were men, 63% had PD-L1 expression of less than 1%, 75% had Intermediate-risk disease, 25% were Poor risk, and 65% had prior nephrectomy. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS), as assessed by Blinded Independent Radiology Committee (BIRC). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Safety. The median follow up was 20.2 months.

The study met the Primary endpoint and the median PFS was not reached in the Cabozantinib group and was 11.3 months in the placebo group (HR=0.73; P=0.013). Patients treated with the Cabozantinib three-drug combination had a 27% lower risk of disease progression or death compared to those on the two drug immunotherapy combination. This PFS benefit was predominantly noted in the Intermediate-risk group. The Objective Response Rate was 43% with the Cabozantinib combination versus 36% in the placebo plus dual immunotherapy group, with 3% of patients achieving a Complete Response in both treatment groups. The Disease Control Rate was 86% and 72%, respectively. The median Duration of Response was not reached in either treatment group. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 73% of patients treated with the combination of Cabozantinib, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, and in 41% of patients treated with the Nivolumab and Ipilimumab combination. Discontinuation of all treatment agents due to adverse events occurred in 12% and 5% of patients, respectively.

The authors concluded that this is the first study to show that a TKI added to dual checkpoint inhibition significantly improved Progression Free Survival, in patients with untreated, Intermediate or Poor risk advanced kidney cancer, compared to doublet immunotherapy. Follow-up for Overall Survival is ongoing.

Phase III study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) of IMDC intermediate or poor risk (COSMIC-313). Choueiri TK, Powles TB, Albiges L, et al. Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S808-S869. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1089. LBA8

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab)

RR

The FDA on November 17, 2021, approved KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) for the adjuvant treatment of patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) at intermediate-high or high risk of recurrence following nephrectomy, or following nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions. KEYTRUDA® is a product of Merck & Co.