Tag: Prostate Cancer

SUMMARY: Proton Radiotherapy (PRT) unlike external beam radiotherapy uses energy from positively charged particles called protons and has the ability to precisely localize the radiation dose to the tumor site, minimizing collateral damage. In this retrospective analysis, data on 27,647 Medicare beneficiaries who received PRT or IMRT (Intensity-Modulated RadioTherapy) for prostate cancer, was reviewed, during 2008 and/or 2009. At 12 months post-treatment, there was no statistical difference in genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity for patients who had received PRT compared to those who were treated with IMRT. With PRT almost twice as expensive as IMRT, it remains to be seen if PRT will be reimbursed by third party payors. It is interesting to note that in this study, patients receiving PRT were relatively younger, healthier, and lived in more affluent areas than patients receiving IMRT. Yu JB, Soulos PR, Herrin J, et al. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013;105:25-32

PBRT is a type of external beam radiation therapy in which a beam of Proton particles are used to irradiate cancer tissue. It has been claimed that the main advantage of proton therapy is its ability to more precisely localize the radiation dosage to the tumor tissue and thereby improve tumor control, without causing significant damage to the surrounding tissues. This theoretical consideration was however disproved in a study published in the Jan 2, 2013 issue of the JNCI. In this study, data was gathered following prostate cancer treatment of over 22,000 medicare beneficiaries, with either IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) or PBRT. The authors noted that PBRT was not superior to IMRT with regards to efficacy or toxicity, after one year. PBRT was however twice as expensive as IMRT. It therefore remains to be seen if third party payors will warm up to PBRT,  with the expansion of PBRT centers across the country.

SUMMARY:The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved XTANDI® (Enzalutamide), an oral agent, formerly known as MDV3100, for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had progressed on TAXOTERE® (Docetaxel) based chemotherapy regimen. The approval was based on the results from the AFFIRM clinical trial. XTANDI® is an androgen receptor antagonist with a significantly higher binding affinity for the androgen receptor (AR) compared to the antiandrogen bicalutamide and there by competitively inhibits the binding of androgens to the androgen receptor. Majority of the patients with advanced prostate cancer become refractory to hormone therapy because of increased production of androgen receptors by the tumors as well as mutated androgen receptors. The superiority of this novel agent, XTANDI®, is based on the fact that the expression of androgen receptor dependent genes are downregulated with XTANDI® leading to cell death or apoptosis, whereas with bicalutamide the expression of these genes are upregulated. Further XTANDI® continues to antagonize mutated androgen receptors on the prostate tumor cells in contrast to bicalutamide which behaves as an agonist. It is thus an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI). The AFFIRM clinical trial is a randomized, multinational phase III study in which patients who had received prior docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens were randomized 2:1 to receive either XTANDI®, 160 mg/day or placebo. Patients treated with XTANDI® had a median survival of 18.4 months, compared with 13.6 months for men treated with placebo, with a median OS advantage of 4.8 months and a reduction in the risk of death by 37%. Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 5; abstr LBA1)