The FDA on August 14, 2023, approved HEPZATO® KIT as a liver-directed treatment for adult patients with uveal melanoma with unresectable hepatic metastases affecting less than 50% of the liver and no extrahepatic disease, or extrahepatic disease limited to the bone, lymph nodes, subcutaneous tissues, or lung that is amenable to resection or radiation. HEPZATO® is a product of Delcath Systems, Inc.
Tag: General Medical Oncology & Hematology
Single Blood Test for Multi-Cancer Early Detection
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2023, 1,958,310 new cancer cases and 609,820 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Although cancer mortality rates continue to decline with advances in treatment, improving early detection can reduce disease and treatment-related morbidity, improve treatment outcomes, quality of life and reduce financial burden both for the patient as well as the society as a whole. Currently the USPSTF (Unites States Preventive Services Task Force) and ACS (American Cancer Society) recommend screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. Neither the ACS nor USPSTF have specific recommendations for prostate cancer screening. These cancers collectively account for only 42% of annual cancer incidence in people aged 50-79 years. It has been estimated that detection of cancer at an earlier stage could reduce cancer-related deaths by 15% or more within 5 years. Some of the available screening tests reduce cancer-specific mortality, but are associated with high false-positive rates, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment.
Galleri is a Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) test developed for the early detection of multiple asymptomatic cancers that lack recommended screening tests, using a blood sample. DNA (cell free DNA) is shed into the blood stream both by tumor cells as well as healthy cells. The Galleri test uses Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and machine-learning algorithms to isolate cell-free DNA and analyze more than 100,000 DNA regions and over a million specific DNA sites, to screen for a signal shared by cancers. The test looks for cell-free DNA and identifies whether it comes from healthy or cancer cells. DNA from cancer cells has specific methylation patterns that identify it as a cancer signal. Methylation patterns also contain information about the tissue type or organ associated with the cancer signal. So, once a cancer signal is detected, the Galleri test predicts the Cancer Signal Origin, or the tissue or organ where the cancer signal originated, to help guide diagnostic evaluation. The Galleri test is recommended for use in adults with an elevated risk for cancer, such as those aged 50 or older, and should be used in addition to routine cancer screening tests. Galleri is not recommended in individuals who are pregnant, 21 years old or younger, or undergoing active cancer treatment.
A validation study (Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study-CCGA) was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the Galleri test. This study included 2,823 people with a known diagnosis of cancer and 1,254 healthy people. The overall Sensitivity for cancer signal detection was 51.5% and the Specificity was 99.5%. The sensitivity of the test increased with advanced cancer stages. Cancer signals were detected across over 50 cancer types and the overall accuracy of predicting Cancer Signal Origin in those who tested true positive was 88.7% (Ann Oncol. 2021;32:1167-1177).
PATHFINDER was a pilot, prospective cohort study conducted to investigate the feasibility of MCED testing for cancer screening. This study included 6,621 participants from oncology and primary care outpatient clinics at seven U.S. health networks who underwent MCED blood testing. Participants were 50 years or older, with no signs or symptoms of cancer, and majority were women (63.5%) and White (91.7%). Approximately 56% of participants had additional risk factors such as smoking, germline cancer predisposition, or personal history of treated cancer. The Primary outcome was time to diagnosis, and extent of diagnostic testing required to confirm the presence or absence of cancer.
MCED testing detected a cancer signal in 1.4% of the total patient sample of whom 38% had cancer confirmed (true positives), while 62% had no cancer (false positives). In patients in whom no cancer signal was detected, 95.5% were true negatives, 1.3% was false negatives, and 3.2% did not have cancer-status assessment at the end of the study. The tests accuracy in predicting the primary cancer location (Cancer Signal Origin) among the true positives was high at 97%. The median time to achieving a diagnostic resolution was 79 days, 57 days in true-positive patients and 162 days in false-positive ones. Fewer procedures were done in participants with false-positive results compared to true-positive results (30% versus 82% respectively) and few participants had surgery (one with a false-positive result and three with a true-positive result).
Among participants whose testing was true-positive and who had a confirmed new cancer diagnosis, nearly half (48%) were detected at an early stage (Stage I-II) when the potential for curative treatment is increased. Further, 74% of the MCED-detected cancers were cancer types that do not currently have USPSTF screening recommendations. These included cancers of the bile duct, pancreas, small intestine, and spindle cell neoplasm, which are all associated with high mortality rates and may be amenable to surgical resection at early stages.
In the 12 months study period, 121 cancers were diagnosed, of whom 29% had a cancer signal detected by MCED, while 31% were detected thru screening and 40% were detected clinically. The overall Positive Predictive Value of MCED was 38%, Negative Predictive Value was 98.6%, and specificity was 99.1%. The cancer yield rate was 0.53% (number needed to screen to find one MCED-detected cancer was 189).
The researchers concluded that this study demonstrates the feasibility of screening for multiple cancers using a blood test and lays the foundation for large, controlled trials necessary to establish clinical utility and cost-effectiveness. Multi Cancer Early Detection test was also able to accurately predict tumor origin, and the diagnosis of cancer was established in less than 2 months in the true-positive patients.
Blood-based tests for multicancer early detection (PATHFINDER): a prospective cohort study. Schrag D, Beer TM, McDonnell CH, et al. The Lancet 2023;402:1251-1260.
Non-Hormonal Treatments for Menopausal Symptoms – NA Menopause Society 2023 Position Statement
SUMMARY: It is estimated that the 50 million women will attain menopause annually. Natural menopause occurs in women between age 49-52 years. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) manifesting as hot flashes and night sweats are the most common symptoms of menopause. These symptoms occur in up to 80% of menopausal women lasting from 7-10 years and sometimes even longer, significantly impacting their quality of life. Compared to other ethnic groups, menopausal symptoms tend to be less severe in Asian women and more severe in African American women.
Hormone Replacement Therapy remains the most effective treatment and should be considered in menopausal women younger than 60 years, within 10 years of their final menstrual periods, with no contraindications. However, the use of Hormone Replacement Therapy has declined substantially, following the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy trials recommendation, not to prescribe menopausal hormone therapy for chronic disease prevention due to the complex pattern of risks and benefits, including increases in invasive breast cancer, stroke and pulmonary embolism.
Nonhormonal interventions have therefore been important considerations for symptomatic menopausal women. The North American Menopause Society convened an advisory panel of clinicians and research experts in the field of women’s health, to review and evaluate the literature published after the Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society in 2015.
This advisory panel assessed the most current and available literature to recommend or not recommend use, with the level of evidence assigned, on the basis of these categories:
• Level I: Good and consistent scientific evidence.
• Level II: Limited or inconsistent scientific evidence.
• Level III: Consensus and expert opinion
The following are the evidence-based updated guidelines:
Level I
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: CBT has been shown to reduce the bother and interference associated with VMS.
Clinical hypnosis: Clinical hypnosis has been shown to reduce VMS frequency and severity.
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)/ Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs): SSRIs and SNRIs are associated with mild to moderate improvements in vasomotor symptoms.
SSRIs: Paroxetine 7.5 mg daily is approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. Paroxetine however should be avoided in women taking Tamoxifen to treat or prevent breast cancer. Other SSRIs include Citalopram and Escitalopram which have less of an effect on the CYP2D6 enzyme.
SNRIs: Venlafaxine may be a safer choice in women using Tamoxifen as coadministration of SSRIs such as Paroxetine or Fluoxetine with Tamoxifen may lead to inhibition of CYP2D6 (the enzyme that converts Tamoxifen to its most active metabolite, endoxifen).
Gabapentin: Gabapentin is approved by the FDA as an antiepileptic drug, and is often used to treat diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. However, several trials studying the dose of 900 mg (300 mg three times/day) show that this has improved the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms.
Fezolinetant (VEOZAH®): Fezolinetant is a first-in-class neurokinin B antagonist that is FDA approved for management of vasomotor symptoms. It modulates the neuronal activity in the thermoregulatory center of the brain.
Oxybutynin: Oxybutynin is an antimuscarinic, anticholinergic therapy that is used for the treatment of overactive bladder and urinary urge incontinence. Oxybutynin has been shown to reduce moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms, although in older adults, long-term use may be associated with cognitive decline
Pregabalin and Clonidine are not recommended for vasomotor symptoms
Level II-III
Weight Loss: The limited available evidence suggests that weight loss may be used to improve vasomotor symptoms for some women.
Stellate ganglion blockade: This procedure is a widely used to treat migraine and complex regional pain syndrome by injecting an anesthetic agent at the lower cervical or upper thoracic region. This blockade might help alleviate moderate to very severe vasomotor symptoms in select women. Because of the potential risks and adverse events, its potential use for vasomotor symptoms should be carefully evaluated.
The following interventions have NOT BEEN PROVEN beneficial and NOT RECOMMENDED interventions:
Paced respiration, Supplements/Herbal remedies, avoiding triggers such as alcohol, caffeine, spicy foods or hot foods, Cooling techniques, Exercise, Yoga, Mindfulness-based intervention such as meditation, Relaxation, Suvorexant, Soy foods and Soy extracts, Soy metabolite equol, Cannabinoids, Acupuncture, Calibration of neural oscillations, Chiropractic interventions, and Dietary modification.
The panel concluded that the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms is hormonal therapy and should be considered in menopausal women within 10 years of their final menstrual periods. For women who are not candidates for hormone therapy because of contraindications (estrogen-dependent cancers or cardiovascular disease) or personal preference, it is important for healthcare professionals to be well informed about the evidence-based nonhormone treatment options, for reducing vasomotor symptoms.
NAMS POSITION STATEMENT: The 2023 nonhormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society 2023;30:573-590. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002200
OMISIRGE® (Omidubicel-onlv)
The FDA on April 17, 2023, approved OMISIRGE® for use in adult and pediatric patients (12 years and older) with hematologic malignancies who are planned for umbilical cord blood transplantation following myeloablative conditioning, to reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the incidence of infection. OMISIRGE® is a product of Gamida Cell Ltd.
Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2023: ENHERTU® Effective in Multiple HER2 Expressing Solid Tumors
SUMMARY: The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers as well as advanced Gastric and GastroEsophageal (GE) junction cancers overexpress or have amplification of the HER2 oncogene. These patients often receive first line treatment with a combination of chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 antibody. Several other cancer types including gynecologic and urothelial cancers overexpress HER oncogene.
ENHERTU® (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting HER2, with the amino acid sequence similar to Trastuzumab, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a potent cytotoxic Topoisomerase I inhibitor as the cytotoxic drug (payload). ENHERTU® has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the tetrapeptide-based linker is stable in the plasma and is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are up-regulated in tumor cells. Unlike KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine), another ADC targeting HER2, ENHERTU® has a higher drug-to-antibody ratio (8 versus 4), released payload easily crosses the cell membrane with resulting potent cytotoxic effect on neighboring tumor cells regardless of target expression, and the released cytotoxic agent (payload) has a short half-life, thus minimizing systemic exposure.
ENHERTU® is approved by the FDA for use in unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, HER2-low breast cancer, HER2-mutant non–small cell lung cancer, and locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive gastric cancer. ENHERTU® in a Phase I trial, demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in multiple advanced solid tumors expressing HER2 oncogene.
DESTINY-PanTumor-02 is an international, open-label Phase II study conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of ENHERTU® in patients with HER2-expressing biliary tract, bladder, cervical, endometrial, ovarian, pancreatic, or other tumors. This study involved 267 patients (N=267) across 7 different cohorts, including 6 tumor-specific cohorts (urothelial bladder, biliary tract, cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers) as well as a rare tumor cohort that included several other tumor types for which ENHERTU® is currently either not available or not being investigated (including head and neck cancers and intestinal adenocarcinoma). Patients with breast, gastric, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers were excluded. Patients in this study had HER2-expressing (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+) locally advanced or metastatic disease that progressed after at least one systemic treatment or that had no treatment options. Among those studied 75 patients were IHC 3+ and 125 were IHC 2+ by central testing. Study patients were treated with at least one dose of ENHERTU® 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks and efficacy and safety were analyzed in all patients who received one or more doses of ENHERTU®. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included Duration of Response (DOR), Disease Control Rate, Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival, and Safety.
At data cutoff and after a median follow-up, 9.7 months, the ORR among all patients was 37.1% with a median DOR of 11.8 months. In patients with IHC 3+ expression, the ORR was 61.3% and the median DOR was 22.1 months whereas among those patients with IHC 2+ expression, the ORR was 27.2% and the median DOR was 9.8 months.
Treatment with ENHERTU resulted in the following Objective Response Rates across different tumor types:
• Endometrial cancer: 57.5% for all patients, 84.6% for IHC 3+, and 47.1% for IHC 2+
• Cervical cancer: 50% for all patients, 75% for IHC 3+, 40% for IHC 2+
• Ovarian cancer: 45% for all patients, 63.6% for IHC 3+, 36.8% for IHC 2+
• Urothelial cancer: 39% for all patients, 56.3% for IHC 3+, 35% for IHC 2+
• Biliary tract cancer: 22% for all patients, 56.3% for IHC 3+, 0% for IHC 2+
• Pancreatic cancer: 4% for all patients, 0% for IHC 3+, 5.3% for IHC 2+
The most common treatment-related side effects were nausea, fatigue, and cytopenias and there were no new safety signals.
It was concluded from this study results that ENHERTU® is a potential new treatment option for patients with HER2-expressing solid tumors, based on the encouraging Objective Response Rate, durable clinical benefit, and a manageable safety profile, in this heavily pretreated population. The authors added that this is the first tumor-agnostic global study of ENHERTU® in a broad range of HER2-expressing solid tumors.
Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing solid tumors: DESTINY-PanTumor02 (DP-02) interim results. Meric-Bernstam F, Makker V, Oaknin A, et al. J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 17; abstr LBA3000)
Platelet Transfusion before Central Venous Catheter Placement in Patients with Thrombocytopenia
SUMMARY: Thrombocytopenia is a frequent finding in hospitalized patients and is one of the most common reasons for inpatient hematology consultations. Thrombocytopenia is usually defined as a platelet count of less than 150,000 per cubic millimeter, whereas severe thrombocytopenia is considered as platelet counts less than 50,000 per cubic millimeter. It is estimated that the prevalence of thrombocytopenia at admission to ICU is around 20-30% of patients, and a similar number of patients develop thrombocytopenia (from a normal platelet count) while being treated in the ICU.
Approximately 18% of hospitalized patients undergo Central Venous Catheter (CVC) placement, an invasive procedure, during admission. Central Venous Catheter facilitates simultaneous infusion of multiple medications, administration of vasoactive drugs, irritating or hypertonic solutions such as TPN, as well as hemodialysis and hemodynamic monitoring. The routine use of ultrasound guided CVC placement has greatly reduced the risk of bleeding complication. In clinical practice, platelet-transfusion thresholds range from 20,000 to 50,000 per cubic millimeter, as there is lack of good-quality evidence. It is however unclear whether the use of prophylactically transfused platelet concentrates is necessary to prevent CVC-related bleeding complications, in patients with severe thrombocytopenia.
The PACER trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority study of Prophylactic Platelet Transfusion Prior to Central Venous Catheter Placement in Patients with Thrombocytopenia. This trial was conducted on hematology wards and in ICUs at 10 hospitals in the Netherlands, to evaluate whether the omission of prophylactic platelet transfusion before CVC placement in patients with a platelet count of 10,000 to 50,000 per cubic millimeter increased the risk of catheter-related bleeding. This study included 373 patients (N=373) randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either one unit of platelet concentrate (N=188) or no platelet transfusion (N=185) before CVC placement. CVC placement was ultrasound guided, performed by an experienced operator, could be of any diameter, could be either tunneled or nontunneled, and could be placed in the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein, or femoral vein. Randomization was stratified according to the trial center and catheter type (large-bore dialysis catheter or regular catheter). Patient characteristics at the time of CVC placement were well balanced between the two trial groups. Exclusion criteria included therapeutically administered anticoagulant, a history of congenital or acquired coagulation factor deficiency or bleeding risk, or a spontaneously prolonged INR of 1.5 or more.
The Primary outcome was the occurrence of catheter-related bleeding of Grade 2-4 within 24 hours after CVC placement. Bleeding was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The occurrence of bleeding and any related treatments were recorded by trained staff members at each site immediately after CVC placement, and at 1 hour and 24 hours thereafter. A key Secondary outcome was major bleeding (Grade 3-4).
Grade 2-4 catheter-related bleeding occurred in 4.8% of patients in the platelet transfusion group and in 11.9% of patients in the no-transfusion group. The absolute risk difference was 7.1%, Relative Risk was 2.45, and noninferiority of withholding platelet transfusion was not shown. The risk of Grade 3 or 4 catheter-related bleeding was lower in the platelet transfusion group compared to the no-transfusion group (2.1% versus 4.9%), with Relative Risks consistent with the Primary outcome.
The bleeding risk in the prespecified exploratory subgroup analysis, were similar to the findings of the Primary analysis. The bleeding risk among the patients being treated on the hematology ward was higher than that among patients in the ICU, and the same was true with the use of tunneled catheters as compared with nontunneled catheters. The differences in CVC-related bleeding risk was attributed to patients in the ICU more often having consumptive thrombocytopenia, whereas patients with hematologic problems in the hematology ward more often have hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia.
It was concluded from this study that in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, withholding prophylactic platelet transfusion before Central Venous Catheter placement in those with a platelet count of 10,000 to 50,000 per cubic millimeter resulted in more catheter-related bleeding events, and prophylactic platelet transfusion was associated with a lower risk of bleeding.
Platelet Transfusion before CVC Placement in Patients with Thrombocytopenia. van Baarle FLF, van de Weerdt EK, van der Velden WJFM, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1956-1965.
Whole Exome Sequencing Identifies Cancer Predisposition Syndromes Missed by Current Screening Guidelines
SUMMARY: Hereditary factors play an important role in the risk of developing several cancers. Therefore, identification of a germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment decision making, risk-reducing interventions, cancer screening for early diagnosis, germline testing and targeted surveillance of unaffected relatives. Previously published studies have been biased by estimating the prevalence of germline cancer susceptibility in patients with breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer from registry populations, genetic testing companies, and high-risk cancer clinics.
With the widespread adoption of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), multiple genes can be tested simultaneously (MultiGene Panel Testing-MGPT), rather than sequential single-gene testing, making MultiGene Panel Testing cheaper, faster and more efficient. Further, single-test multigene multiplexing strategy analyzes numerous cancer susceptibility genes and frequently detects highly penetrant, clinically actionable Pathogenic Germline Variants (PGV) in individuals whose clinical histories fail to fulfill syndrome-specific testing criteria. This is clinically relevant, as it has become increasingly complex to determine which individuals warrant germline testing. Several risk assessment models have been developed to provide probability of an individual carrying a germline mutation. These models provide syndrome-specific risk assessment for Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)), etc.
The Genomics and Population Health Action Collaborative was formed in 2015 with the goal of identifying challenges and potential best practices for the widespread integration of evidence-based genomics applications in population health programs. They endorsed 11 genes associated with the three CDC Tier 1 inherited Autosomal Dominant cancer predisposition conditions – Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and Familial Hypercholesterolemia, as being a reasonable starting point for primary genomic screening in the general population.
Tapestry study is collaboration between Mayo Clinic and Helix, a population genomics company. The Tapestry trial included 44,306 patients who received treatment across Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida. Researchers gathered and evaluated saliva samples for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (denoting Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer), as well as MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM (denoting Lynch syndrome). The mean age was 55 years, 63% were women and 90% were Caucasian. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether screening in a multisite tertiary medical center using Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) could efficiently identify carriers of two conditions, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers and Lynch syndrome, and determine the frequency of incremental carriers identified outside of traditional clinical practice guidelines.
The researchers identified 550 carriers of pathogenic mutations, including 387 individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC) and 163 with Lynch syndrome. Of these individuals with pathogenic mutations, 52.1% had no knowledge prior to this study that they carried cancer predisposition genes, and 39.2% of CARRIERS did not meet NCCN criteria for genetic testing, including 56.2% of those with Lynch syndrome and 32% of those with HBOC. Among the patients who were NEWLY DIAGNOSED with Lynch syndrome and HBOC syndrome during this study, 60% were ineligible for genetic testing per the current guidelines. They included 78% of those with Lynch syndrome and 51% of those with HBOC syndrome. Some of the reasons for not meeting NCCN criteria included having no personal history of cancer (63.3%), an insufficient number of relatives who had cancer (60.5%) and a cancer type or types not related to a genetic syndrome (58.6%). Among those who met NCCN guidelines for testing, 34.2% reported not knowing their diagnosis prior to the study. The researchers also noted that patients with HBOC or Lynch syndrome from racial and ethnic minority groups were significantly more likely than white patients to not meet NCCN screening criteria (49% versus 32%, respectively).
It was concluded that genomic screening in the broad general population for CDC Tier 1 genetic conditions has the potential to identify 50% of at-risk carriers who are otherwise not detected in current medical practice. Early diagnosis and intervention could have a positive impact on public health, and a systemic bias in the current guidelines could potentially be overcome by universal genetic testing. The authors added that the limitation of this study is that the patient population in this study may not reflect the demographics of the general population.
Exome sequencing identifies individuals with cancer predisposition syndromes missed by current screening guidelines (AACR press release). Available at: www.aacr.org/about-the-aacr/newsroom/news-releases/exome-sequencing-identifies-individuals-with-cancer-predisposition-syndromes-missed-by-current-screening-guidelines/. Published April 18, 2023.
XELODA® (Capecitabine tablets)
The FDA on December 14, 2022, approved updated labeling for XELODA® (Capecitabine tablets) (Xeloda, Genentech, Inc.) under Project Renewal, an Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) initiative aimed at updating labeling information for certain older oncology drugs to ensure information is clinically meaningful and scientifically up to date. XELODA® is a product of Genentech, Inc.
RYLAZE® (Asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi recombinant-rywn)
The FDA on November 18, 2022, approved a new Monday-Wednesday-Friday dosing regimen for RYLAZE® (Asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi recombinant-rywn). Under the new regimen, patients should receive 25 mg/m2 intramuscularly on Monday and Wednesday mornings, and 50 mg/m2 intramuscularly on Friday afternoon. It also is approved to be administered every 48 hours at a dose of 25 mg/m2 intramuscularly. RYLAZE® is a product of Jazz Pharmaceuticals.
RETEVMO® (Selpercatinib)
The FDA on September 21, 2022, granted accelerated approval to RETEVMO® (Selpercatinib) for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a REearranged during Transfection (RET) gene fusion that have progressed on or following prior systemic treatment or who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. RETEVMO® is a product of Eli Lilly and Company.