Category: Meeting Updates

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Docetaxel may be Preferable Taxane for Black Women to Mitigate Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

RR

SUMMARY: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a notable side effect associated with taxane chemotherapy agents, particularly Paclitaxel, and has significant implications for patient quality of life and treatment outcomes. Notably, Black women with early-stage breast cancer exhibit a disproportionately higher incidence of TIPN compared to their White counterparts. This disparity is critical, as TIPN can lead to increased dose reductions, which in turn may adversely affect treatment efficacy and long-term cure rates.

Historically, retrospective analyses, such as those from the ECOG-ACRIN-E5103 trial, revealed that Black patients experience more severe TIPN and subsequent dose reductions when treated with weekly Paclitaxel. This pattern was less pronounced in patients treated with every 3 week Docetaxel. Additionally, genetic studies identified specific germline variants associated with a heightened risk of severe TIPN in individuals of African ancestry. These findings prompted the need for a prospective trial to validate these genetic markers and to evaluate the comparative tolerability of Paclitaxel versus Docetaxel specifically in Black women.

The EAZ171 study was designed with several key objectives. It aimed to prospectively validate whether specific germline genetic variants are associated with a higher risk of TIPN in Black women. The focus was on genetic variants in the SBF2 and FCAMR genes. The Secondary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of TIPN and the frequency of dose reductions between two taxanes—weekly Paclitaxel and every 3 week Docetaxel, in a cohort of Black women with early-stage breast cancer.

This study included 249 Black women who self-identified as such and were scheduled to receive either Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly for 12 doses (N=121) or Docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles (N=128). The study utilized a pragmatic design where the choice of taxane was based on physician discretion and patient-specific disease characteristics, rather than a randomized design. Patients could also receive Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Trastuzumab, and/or Pertuzumab per institution routine care, per treating physician discretion. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Participants were genotyped to identify genetic variants associated with neuropathy risk. Those with FCAMR homozygous wild type or SBF2 mutations were categorized as high risk, while those with variant alleles in FCAMR and wild type SBF2 were categorized as low risk. The incidence of Grade 2-4 TIPN was evaluated using physician-reported CTCAE v.5, while patient-reported outcomes were assessed through PRO-CTCAE, FACT/GOG-NTx, and EORTC CIPN20 questionnaires.

The key findings were:

Genetic Predictors: Germline variations did not significantly influence the risk of TIPN for either treatment group. The anticipated differences in TIPN based on genetic risk did not reach statistical significance.

TIPN Incidence: Grade 2-4 TIPN was notably higher in the Paclitaxel group compared to the Docetaxel group. Physician-reported TIPN was 45% in the Paclitaxel arm versus 29% in the Docetaxel arm (P=0.02). Similarly, patient-reported TIPN symptoms were 40% with Paclitaxel versus 24% with Docetaxel (P=0.03).

Dose Reductions: Patients receiving Paclitaxel experienced more frequent dose reductions due to TIPN (28% vs. 9%, p<0.001) and for any cause (39% vs. 25%, p=0.02) compared to those receiving Docetaxel.

Patient-Reported Outcomes: The trends in worsening neuropathy scores over time were similar between the two arms, but significant differences were not observed at the one-year mark.

In summary, the EAZ171 study provided crucial insights into the management of TIPN in Black women with early-stage breast cancer. Despite the lack of significant impact from genetic markers, the clear advantage of Docetaxel over Paclitaxel in terms of lower incidence of severe TIPN and fewer dose reductions underscores its potential as a preferable taxane for this patient population. This trial results advocate for considering Docetaxel in treatment regimens for Black women to mitigate TIPN-related complications and possibly enhance treatment outcomes. The findings emphasize the need for tailored treatment strategies to improve health equity and therapeutic efficacy in breast cancer care.

ECOG-ACRIN EAZ171: Prospective validation trial of germline variants and taxane type in association with taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) in Black women with early-stage breast cancer. Ballinger TJ, Zhao F, Sparano JA, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA503). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA503

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Switching to VERZENIO® Post-CDK4/6 inhibitor Progression May Improve Outcomes in HR-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the US, approximately 310,720 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2024, and about 42,250 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. These patients are often treated with single agent endocrine therapy, endocrine therapy in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitor, or single agent chemotherapy.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. Cyclin Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity and phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation and associated with increased expression of CDK4. The understanding of the role of Cyclin Dependent Kinases in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.

Abemaciclib (VERZENIO®) is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase activity that prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein, thereby inducing G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell proliferation. Abemaciclib is structurally distinct from other CDK 4 and 6 inhibitors (such as Ribociclib and Palbociclib) and is 14 times more potent against cyclin D1/CDK 4 and cyclin D3/CDK 6, in enzymatic assays, but potentially less toxic than earlier pan-CDK inhibitors. At higher doses, only Abemaciclib causes significant cancer cell death, compared with other CDK4/6 inhibitors, suggesting that this drug may be affecting proteins, other than CDK4/6. Additionally, preclinical studies have demonstrated that Abemaciclib may have additional therapeutic benefits for a subset of tumors that are unresponsive to treatment or have grown resistant to other CDK4/6 inhibitors.

For the patient group with advanced or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, Abemaciclib has FDA approval in combination with an Aromatase Inhibitor as initial endocrine-based therapy, in combination with Fulvestrant, with disease progression following endocrine therapy, and as monotherapy with disease progression following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Abemaciclib has activity in the Central Nervous System, and is included in the ASCO guidelines among the active agents in ER-positive/HER2-amplified breast cancer with brain metastasis. Abemaciclib has been shown to be an effective therapy after treatment with Palbociclib, another CDK4/6 inhibitor.

postMONARCH is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Abemaciclib in combination with Fulvestrant compared to a placebo plus Fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who experienced disease progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy. In this study, 368 patients (N=368) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant (N=182) or placebo plus Fulvestrant (N=186). The eligibility criteria included disease progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus Aromatase Inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease, or relapse on or after CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. No prior treatment for advanced disease aside from the initial regimen was allowed. The majority (99%) had progressed on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy as initial therapy for advanced disease. Prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatments included Palbociclib (59%), Ribociclib (33%), and Abemaciclib (8%). Approximately 99% of patients had progressed on CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy as initial treatement for advanced breast cancer. The two treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 59 years and stratification factors included duration of prior CDK4/6 inhibition, visceral metastases, and geographic region. Approximately 60% of patients had visceral metastasis and Imaging studies were performed every 8 weeks for the first 12 months and then every 12 weeks. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints encompassed PFS assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), and Safety. The study analysis was event-driven, with the primary outcome targeting 258 events, and with an interim analysis planned at 70% of events.

At the interim analysis, with 70% of the planned events, Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in investigator-assessed PFS compared to placebo plus Fulvestrant (HR=0.66; P=0.01). Upon completion of the primary analysis with 258 events, the HR for PFS was 0.73 reflecting a 27% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. The 6-month PFS rates were 50% for the Abemaciclib group versus 37% for the placebo group. The benefit of Abemaciclib was more pronounced with BICR-assessed PFS, showing a HR of 0.55 representing a 45% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. In patients with measurable disease, the ORR was 17% for the Abemaciclib group compared to 7% for the placebo group (P=0.0145 by investigator assessment and P=0.0008 by BICR). OS data remained immature with a 20.9% event rate at the time of analysis.

Subgroup Analyses suggested that patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use for more than 12 months had a median PFS of 7.0 months versus 5.4 months in the placebo group (HR=0.70; 95% CI = 0.52–0.94). For those with treatment durations up to 12 months, the median PFS was 5.5 months versus 3.0 months (HR=0.80; 95% CI = 0.50–1.29). The benefit was greater in patients without visceral metastases (HR=0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.83), though there was still a benefit observed in those with visceral metastases (HR=0.87; 95% CI = 0.64–1.17). Benefit was observed regardless of presence of ESR1 mutations or PI3K pathway alterations.

The safety profile of Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant was consistent with known profiles. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 25% of patients receiving the combination therapy. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 6% of patients on the Abemaciclib arm, compared with none in the placebo group. The most common Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia.

In summary, the postMONARCH trial supports the use of Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant as an effective treatment for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy, offering a viable option and underscoring the value of continued CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression in the evolving landscape of breast cancer treatment.

This combination offers significant improvement in PFS, especially in patients with longer durations of prior CDK4/6 inhibition and those without visceral metastases and may be a preferred strategy in the second-line setting for patients who have progressed on initial CDK4/6-based therapies, particularly when biomarker-specific therapies are not available.

Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer following progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy: Primary outcome of the phase 3 postMONARCH trial. Kalinsky K, Bianchini G, Hamilton EP, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA1001). DOI 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1001

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Integrating Carboplatin in Early Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. The American Cancer Society estimates that in the US, approximately 310,720 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2024, and about 42,250 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous, molecularly diverse group of breast cancers and are ER (Estrogen Receptor), PR (Progesterone Receptor) and HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2) negative. TNBC accounts for 15-20% of invasive breast cancers, with a higher incidence noted in young patients. It is usually aggressive, and tumors tend to be high grade and patients with TNBC are at a higher risk of both local and distant recurrence. Those with metastatic disease have one of the worst prognoses of all cancers with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 13 months. The majority of patients with TNBC who develop metastatic disease do so within the first 3 years after diagnosis, whereas those without recurrence during this period of time have survival rates similar to those with ER-positive breast cancers.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the preferred treatment approach in this group of patients and can potentially increase the likelihood of tumor resectability and breast conservation. Further, a pathological Complete Response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can result in a longer Event-Free Survival and Overall Survival. Pathological Complete Response is therefore used as an end point for clinical testing of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with early TNBC.

Conventionally, TNBC has been treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens incorporating anthracyclines and taxanes, which remain foundational despite ongoing exploration of novel agents. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) has expanded into neoadjuvant settings, in addition to its consistent Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) benefits in advanced TNBC. Recent studies have investigated the addition of platinum agents due to their ability to induce DNA damage and apoptosis in tumors with defective DNA repair mechanisms, such as those seen in BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Triple-Negative Breast Cancers that do not harbor BRCA1/2 mutations show defects in the DNA repair mechanism, similar to BRCA1/2 mutant TNBC, and are called BRCAness. Platinum agents have shown promise in increasing the pCR rate when combined with standard taxane and anthracycline regimens in neoadjuvant settings, potentially enhancing outcomes for patients who otherwise face high recurrence risks. The importance of achieving pCR has been underscored by studies like the CTNeoBC pooled analysis, which demonstrated significantly improved survival outcomes in TNBC patients who achieved pCR, compared to those with residual disease. This has prompted the exploration of combination therapies aimed at maximizing response rates and minimizing residual disease burden.

PEARLY is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, Phase III trial in which anthracyclines followed by taxane was compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane plus Carboplatin as (neo)adjuvant therapy in patients with TNBC. Patients with Stage II or III TNBC who need adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Any prior systemic therapy for breast cancer was not allowed. In this study, 868 patients (N=868) were randomized 1:1 to either standard arm treatment, which consisted of Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV along with Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by taxane treatment (Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 doses or Docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles), or experimental group in which Carboplatin AUC5 IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles was added during taxane treatment. Patients were stratified based on the nodal status (N0 versus N+), treatment setting (neoadjuvant versus adjuvant), and BRCA mutation status (positive versus negative). Patients with bilateral, metastatic, and inflammatory breast cancer were excluded. The Primary objective was to evaluate 5-year Event Free Survival (EFS) rate in the enrolled patients. Secondary objectives included Overall Survival (OS), Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS), pathologic Complete Response (pCR), and tolerability.

At a median follow up of 51.1 months, Carboplatin significantly improved the 5-year EFS compared to the control arm (HR 0.68; P=0.017). The 5-year EFS rates were increased from 74.4% to 81.9% with the addition of Carboplatin, demonstrating a 7.5% absolute difference in EFS rates. Subgroup analysis showed consistent benefits across various patient subgroups. Secondary endpoints such as OS and DRFS showed favorable trends in the Carboplatin group, although OS data were not mature at the time of reporting. Grade 3 or more treatment-related Adverse Event rates were 74.6% in the Carboplatin group and 56.7% in the control group, but were generally manageable.

In conclusion, the PEARLY trial demonstrated that the addition of Carboplatin to standard anthracycline followed by taxane therapy significantly improved Event-Free Survival in early-stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. These findings suggest that Carboplatin has a role in enhancing treatment outcomes in TNBC, particularly by reducing the risk of recurrence. Further research and longer-term follow-up are necessary to fully validate these results and refine treatment strategies for this challenging subtype of breast cancer.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial comparing anthracyclines followed by taxane versus anthracyclines followed by taxane plus carboplatin as (neo) adjuvant therapy in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer: Korean Cancer Study Group BR 15-1 PEARLY trial. Sohn J, Kim GM, Jung KH, et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology. Volume 42, Number 17_suppl. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA502

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: ADCETRIS® Combination Improves Overall Survival in Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2024, about 80,620 people will be diagnosed with Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in the United States and about 20,140 individuals will die of this disease. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the United States, and more than 25,000 cases of DLBCL are diagnosed each year in the United States, accounting for more than 25 percent of all lymphoma cases. The incidence has steadily increased 3-4% each year. More than half of patients are 65 or older at the time of diagnosis and the incidence is likely to increase with aging of the American population. The etiology of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma is unknown. Contributing risk factors include immunosuppression (AIDS, transplantation setting, autoimmune diseases), UltraViolet radiation, pesticides, hair dyes, and diet. DLBCL can develop spontaneously or as a result of Richters transformation of low grade diseases such as Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, or Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

DLBCL is a neoplasm of large B cells and the most common chromosome abnormality involves alterations of the BCL-6 gene at the 3q27 locus, which is critical for germinal center formation. Two major molecular subtypes of DLBCL arising from different genetic mechanisms have been identified, using Gene Expression Profiling: Germinal Center B-cell-like (GCB) and Activated B-Cell-like (ABC). Patients in the GCB subgroup have a higher 5-year survival rate, independent of clinical IPI (International Prognostic Index) risk score, whereas patients in the ABC subgroup have a significantly worse outcome. Regardless of molecular subtype, R-CHOP regimen (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone), given every 21 days, for 6 cycles, delivered with curative intent, is the current standard of care for patients of all ages, with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Approximately 30-40% of patients experience disease progression or relapse during the first 2 years, and attempts to improve on R-CHOP regimen have not been successful. Maintenance treatment strategy following R-CHOP, to better control the disease, delay disease progression and improve long term survival, have included Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, CAR T-cell therapy, maintenance treatment with agents such as oral protein kinase inhibitor Enzastaurin and Everolimus. Outcomes for transplant-ineligible patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL patients remain poor. There is a critical unmet need for this patient group.

Brentuximab Vedotin (ADCETRIS®) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets CD30, which is a surface antigen, expressed on Reed-Sternberg cells, in patients with Classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This ADC consists of an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody linked to MonoMethyl Auristatin E (MMAE), an antimicrotubule agent. Upon binding to the CD30 molecule on the cancer cells, MMAE is released into the cancer cell, resulting in cell death. Preclinical data and early phase studies provided the rationale for combining Brentuximab vedotin, Lenalidomide and Rituximab for the treatment of Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL.

ECHELON-3 is an ongoing, global, randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase III study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Brentuximab vedotin in combination with Lenalidomide and Rituximab, compared to Lenalidomide and Rituximab plus placebo, in adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL, regardless of CD30 expression, who have received two or more prior lines of therapy and were ineligible for or had previously failed Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) or Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

In this global study, 230 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Brentuximab vedotin plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab (BV+R2) – N=112, with Brentuximab vedotin administered at 1.2 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks, Lenalidomide at 20 mg orally daily, and Rituximab at 375 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks, or Placebo plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab (placebo+R2) – N=118. Placebo for Brentuximab vedotin with Lenalidomide and Rituximab was administered in the same manner. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median age was 71 years, 56% were male, median prior lines of therapy was 3, 29% had prior CAR T-cell therapy, approximately 15% of patients had prior bispecific antibody exposure, and 68% were CD30 negative with CD30 tumor expression of less than 1%. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Complete Response (CR) Rate.

At the interim analysis, with a median follow-up of 16.4 months, BV+R2 regimen demonstrated a median OS of 13.8 months compared to 8.5 months with placebo+R2, representing a 37% reduction in the risk of death (HR=0.63; P=0.0085). The median PFS was 4.2 months in the BV+R2 arm versus 2.6 months in the placebo+R2 arm (HR=0.53; P<0.0001). The ORR was 64.3% with BV+R2 compared to 41.5% with placebo+R2 (P=0.0006). The CR rate was 40.2% with BV+R2 versus 18.6% with placebo+R2. The efficacy benefits of BV+R2 were consistent across key subgroups, including patients with CD30-positive and CD30-negative disease, highlighting the broad applicability of the regimen.

Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more frequent in the BV+R2 arm compared to placebo+R2 (88% versus 77%), and the most common Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia, anemia and diarrhea. Peripheral Neuropathy was higher with BV+R2 compared to placebo+R2, although generally manageable.

In conclusion, the ECHELON-3 study demonstrated that the addition of Brentuximab vedotin to Lenalidomide and Rituximab significantly improved Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival, and Response Rates in patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL, compared to Lenalidomide and Rituximab alone. This regimen offers a promising new treatment option for patients who have exhausted standard therapies, or are ineligible for intensive treatments like CAR-T cell therapy or HSCT. The results underscore the potential of targeted therapies in reshaping the management of DLBCL, providing renewed hope for improved outcomes in this challenging disease setting. As the study continues to follow patients for long-term outcomes, ongoing research will further elucidate the durability of responses and additional safety data, thereby informing future clinical practice guidelines and optimizing patient care strategies.

Brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Results from the phase 3 ECHELON-3 study. Kim JA, Hahn U, Kim W-S, et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology. Volume 42, Number 17_suppl. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA7005

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Sustained Improvement in Relapse Free Survival with Personalized mRNA Cancer Vaccine plus KEYTRUDA® in Resected High Risk Melanoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 100,640 new cases of melanoma of the skin will be diagnosed in the United States and 8,290 people are expected to die of the disease. The rates of melanoma have been rising rapidly over the past few decades, but this has varied by age. Surgical resection with a curative intent is the standard of care for patients with early stage melanoma.

Patients with resected Stage IIB/C disease comprise a significant group of patients at significant risk of recurrence. Patients with Stage IIB disease have primary tumors that are more than 2 mm, and 4 mm or less in thickness, with ulceration (T3b), or more than 4 mm in thickness without ulceration (T4a). Patients with Stage IIC disease have primary tumors more than 4 mm in thickness with ulceration (T4b). Although Stage II melanoma is less advanced than Stage III, the 5-year risk of recurrence in patients with Stage IIB or Stage IIC disease without adjuvant therapy is approximately 35% and 50% respectively. The 5-year Melanoma-Specific Survival (MSS) rates for patients with Stage IIB/IIC disease are similar to those for Stage IIIA, Stage IIIB and Stage IIIC disease.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are the standard of care adjuvant treatment for high-risk resected melanoma. In the KEYNOTE-054 trial, the 5-year Relapse Free Survival (RFS) with adjuvant Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) was 55.4% versus 38.3% with placebo. In the CHECKMATE-238 trial, the 4-year RFS rate was of 51.7% for Nivolumab (OPDIVO®) versus 41.2% for ipilimumab (YERVOY®). Given the high relapse rates with the present adjuvant melanoma therapies, there is an unmet clinical need.

Pembrolizumab is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

mRNA-4157 (V940) is a novel messenger RiboNucleic Acid (mRNA)-based individualized neoantigen therapy consisting of a single synthetic mRNA coding for up to 34 neoantigens, that is designed and produced based on the unique mutational signature of the DNA sequence of the patients tumor. Individualized neoantigen therapies are designed to prime the immune system so that a patient can generate a tailored antitumor response specific to their tumor mutation signature. mRNA-4157 (V940) was designed to stimulate an immune response by generating specific T cell responses based on the unique mutational signature of a patients tumor. Early clinical studies demonstrated that combining mRNA-4157 (V940) with Pembrolizumab may potentially provide an additive benefit and enhance T cell-mediated destruction of tumor cells.

KEYNOTE-942 is an ongoing randomized, open-label, Phase IIb trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mRNA-4157, an individualized neoantigen therapy, in combination with Pembrolizumab, in patients with completely resected high-risk Stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma. This study included 157 patients who were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive mRNA-4157 in combination with Pembrolizumab (N=107) or Pembrolizumab alone (N=50). The vaccine was administered 1 mg every three weeks for a total of nine doses, and Pembrolizumab was given at 200 mg IV every three weeks for up to 18 cycles (approximately one year). All patients had tumor sample (Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded-FFPE) available for Next Generation Sequencing and patients were stratified by disease stage. mRNA-4157 was successfully prepared for more than 99% of patients in the combination arm. The median patient age was 62 years and 84% of patients had Stage IIIC disease. Approximately 64% of patients were PD-L1 positive and 74% had high Tumor Mutational Burden-TMB (10 or more mutations/Mb) in the combination treatment group, whereas 54% were PD-L1 positive and 60% had high TMB in the single agent Pembrolizumab group, respectively. HLA genotyping was performed to explore associations between specific HLA alleles and treatment response. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted based on TMB, PD-L1 expression, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status.

The Primary endpoint was Relapse Free Survival (RFS), defined as the time from first dose of Pembrolizumab until the date of first recurrence (local, regional, or distant metastasis), a new primary melanoma, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included Distant Metastasis-Free Survival and Safety. Exploratory endpoints included distribution of TMB expression in baseline tumor samples across study arms and their association with the primary RFS endpoint.

At a median follow up of 23 months for the mRNA-4157/V940 plus Pembrolizumab group, and 24 months for Pembrolizumab alone group, the Relapse Free Survival at 18 months was 78.6% for the immunotherapy combination versus 62.2% for Pembrolizumab alone (HR=0.56; P=0.0266), and this equated to a 44% reduction in the risk of recurrence or death with 2 years of follow-up. mRNA-4157/V940 and Pembrolizumab combination treatment demonstrated an improvement in RFS, irrespective of PD-L1 status and TMB status.

In the recent data presented at ASCO 2024, with an additional year of planned follow-up, at a median of approximately 34.9 months, the combination of mRNA-4157 and Pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant clinically meaningful and durable improvement in RFS, the Primary endpoint of the study, compared to Pembrolizumab alone. The risk of recurrence or death was reduced by 49% (HR=0.51; P=0.019), compared to Pembrolizumab monotherapy. The 2.5-year RFS rate for the combination group was 74.8% compared to 55.6% in the Pembrolizumab alone group. The RFS improvement was observed across subgroups irrespective of TMB and PD-L1 levels.

The combination therapy also showed a meaningful improvement in Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, which was a key Secondary endpoint, compared to Pembrolizumab alone (HR=0.38; P=0.015). This represented a 62% reduction in the risk of developing distant metastases or death compared to Pembrolizumab alone.

While not formally tested as a Primary endpoint, Overall Survival trended favorably with the combination therapy, with a 2.5-Year OS Rate of 96.0% for combination versus 90.2% for Pembrolizumab alone (HR=0.425).

The safety profile of mRNA-4157 in combination with Pembrolizumab was consistent with previous analyses and the common adverse events were fatigue (60.6%), injection site pain (56.7%), and chills (49.0%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 25% of patients receiving combination therapy and 18% in the Pembrolizumab alone group. Immune-related adverse events were reported by approximately 37.5% of patients in the combination group and 36% in the Pembrolizumab alone group, with no new safety signals identified.

The KEYNOTE-942 trial demonstrated that mRNA-4157 in combination with Pembrolizumab significantly improved Recurrence-Free Survival and Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in patients with resected high-risk Stage III/IV melanoma, compared to Pembrolizumab alone. These findings suggest a potential benefit across various patient subgroups based on TMB, PD-L1 expression, and ctDNA status. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with expectations for both treatments. Based on these positive results, further investigation in the Phase III INTerpath-001 trial is underway to validate these findings and potentially transform the adjuvant treatment landscape for melanoma patients.

Individualized neoantigen therapy mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab in resected melanoma: 3-year update from the mRNA-4157-P201 (KEYNOTE-942) trial.Weber JS, Khattak MA, Carlino MS, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA9512). DOI 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA9512

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Subcutaneous versus Intravenous RYBREVANT® in Refractory EGFR Mutated Advanced NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer. Approximately 10-15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR mutations and 90% of these mutations are either exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation in exon 21.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in regulating cell proliferation, survival and differentiation, and is overexpressed in a variety of epithelial malignancies. EGFR targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as Gefitinib, Erlotinib, Afatinib, Dacomitinib and Osimertinib target the EGFR signaling cascade. However, patients eventually will develop drug resistance due to new EGFR mutations. Another important cause of drug resistance to TKIs is due to the activation of parallel RTK (Receptor Tyrosine Kinase) pathways such as Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition factor (HGF/MET) pathway, thereby bypassing EGFR TKI inhibitors. These patients are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy as the next line of therapy, resulting in a median Progression Free Survival of 5 months.

Amivantamab (RYBREVANT®) is a fully-human bispecific antibody directed against EGFR and MET receptors. Amivantamab binds extracellularly and simultaneously blocks ligand-induced phosphorylation of EGFR and c-MET, inhibiting tumor growth and promoting tumor cell death. Further, Amivantamab downregulates receptor expression on tumor cells thus preventing drug resistance mediated by new emerging mutations of EGFR or c-MET. By binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor protein, Amivantamab can bypass primary and secondary TKI resistance at the active site. Amivantamab also engages effector cells such as Natural Killer cells, monocytes, and macrophages via its optimized Fc domain. Amivantamab demonstrated activity against a wide range of activating and resistance mutations in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and in patients with MET exon 14 skip mutations, and is approved for the treatment of patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, whose disease progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Lazertinib (LECLAZA®) is a highly selective, third-generation TKI that penetrates the CNS, with demonstrated efficacy in activating EGFR mutations and acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation. Combining Amivantamab with Lazertinib has been shown to provide a synergistic benefit by targeting the extracellular and catalytic EGFR domains.

Amivantamab given intravenously along with Lazertinib demonstrated antitumor activity in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. PALOMA-3 study evaluated the efficacy, PharmacoKinetics (PK), and safety of a subcutaneous formulation of Amivantamab given along with Lazertinib, compared to intravenous (IV) administration given along with Lazertinib, in patients with EGFR Exon 19 deletion or L858R-mutated advanced NSCLC.

PALOMA-3 is a randomized, controlled Phase III trial in which 418 patients who had disease progression on Osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) Amivantamab, both combined with Lazertinib, with 206 patients (N=206) assigned to the SC arm and 212 patients (N=212) assigned to the IV arm. SC Amivantamab was administered at 1600 mg weekly for the first 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks, while IV Amivantamab was given at the approved dose of 1050 mg. Lazertinib was administered at 240 mg orally daily in both groups. Prophylactic anticoagulation was recommended for the first 4 months. The median age of patients was 61 years, 67% were female, 61% were Asian, patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy, and 34% had a history of brain metastases. Co-primary pharmacokinetic noninferiority endpoints were trough concentrations (C trough on Cycle 2 Day 1 or Cycle 4 Day 1) and Cycle 2 AUC Day1-Day 15. Secondary endpoints included Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Progression Free Survival (PFS). Overall Survival (OS) was an exploratory endpoint.

At a median follow up of 7 months, the trial met both co-primary PK endpoints. SC Amivantamab demonstrated non-inferiority compared to IV in terms of trough concentrations and AUC, with geometric mean ratios favoring SC administration. SC Amivantamab along with Lazertinib showed a non-inferior ORR (30.1%) compared to IV (32.5%), meeting the predefined noninferiority criteria (RR=0.92; P=0.001). Among confirmed responders, SC administration resulted in a longer median DoR (11.2 months) compared to 8.3 months with IV administration. Although not statistically significant, SC Amivantamab along with Lazertinib showed a favorable trend in PFS (median 6.1 months versus 4.3 months for IV; HR 0.84, P=0.20). Overall Survival was notably longer with SC administration (HR 0.62; P=0.017), with 65% alive at 12 months in the SC arm versus 51% in the IV group.

SC administration significantly reduced Infusion-Related Reactions by 5 fold (13% versus 66% for IV), with no severe reactions leading to hospitalization in the SC arm. Prophylactic anticoagulation reduced Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) risk (9% SC versus 14% IV) and the overall incidence was lower in the SC group, emphasizing safety benefits. Across both treatment groups, VTE incidence was 10% for patients who received prophylactic anticoagulants versus 21% for patients who did not. With regards to patient experience, SC administration took less than 5 minutes, significantly shorter than IV (initial infusion 5 hours), contributing to higher patient satisfaction (85% versus 35% found SC convenient at end of treatment).

It was concluded that the PALOMA-3 trial demonstrated that SC administration of Amivantamab is non-inferior to IV in terms of PK and efficacy endpoints and represents a paradigm shift towards more patient-friendly and effective treatment options for EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with lower rates of Infusion-Related Reactions and VTE.

Subcutaneous amivantamab vs intravenous amivantamab, both in combination with lazertinib, in refractory EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Primary results, including overall survival (OS), from the global, phase 3, randomized controlled PALOMA-3 trial. Leighl NB, Akamatsu H, Lim SM, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA8505)

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: BLENREP®, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma

RR

SUMMARY: Multiple Myeloma is a clonal disorder of plasma cells in the bone marrow and the American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States, 35,780 new cases will be diagnosed in 2024 and 12,540 patients are expected to die of the disease. Multiple Myeloma is a disease of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years and characterized by intrinsic clonal heterogeneity. Almost all patients eventually will relapse, and patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile, extramedullary disease or refractory disease have the worst outcomes. The introduction of Proteasome Inhibitors, Immunomodulatory agents and CD38 targeted therapies has resulted in higher Response Rates, as well as longer Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), with the median survival for patients with myeloma approaching 10 years or more. Nonetheless, multiple myeloma in 2023 remains an incurable disease.

Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma often receive triplet and quadruplet regimens that incorporate proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 antibodies as first line therapy, as these regimens are associated with prolonged Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival. However, most patients relapse and frontline use of Lenalidomide therapy has increased the number of patients with Lenalidomide-refractory disease at the time of the first relapse. New novel combinations are needed for patients who have relapsed or refractory myeloma, after disease progression during frontline therapy.

B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) is a member of the Tumor Necrosis Factor superfamily of proteins. It is a transmembrane signaling protein primarily expressed by malignant and normal plasma cells and some mature B cells. BCMA is involved in JNK and NF-kB signaling pathways that induce B-cell development and autoimmune responses. BCMA has been implicated in autoimmune disorders, as well as B-lymphocyte malignancies, Leukemia, Lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. B-Cell Maturation Antigen is therefore an established target in myeloma.

Belantamab mafodotin (BLENREP®) is a BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugate comprising a humanised B-cell maturation antigen monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic agent auristatin F via a non-cleavable linker. Among patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, data from a Phase I-II trial involving Belantamab mafodotin, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (BPd) showed some safety concerns but promising clinical activity.

The DREAMM-8 is an ongoing, global, open-label, randomized, multicenter Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Belantamab mafodotin in combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (BPd) compared to the standard of care, Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (PVd), in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had received at least one prior line of therapy, including a Lenalidomide-containing regimen, and experienced disease progression. In this study, 302 patients were randomized 1:1 to BPd regimen (N=155) or PVd regimen (N=147). Patients in the BPd group received Belantamab mafodotin 2.5 mg/kg IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, then 1.9 mg/kg on Day 1 of subsequent cycles, plus Pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily on Days 1-21 of each cycle, and Dexamethasone 40 mg orally weekly on Day 1 of each cycle. Patients in the PVd group received Pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle, Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1, 4, 8, 11 (Cycles 1-8) and Days 1, 8 (Cycle 9+), and Dexamethasone 20 mg orally on the day of and day after Bortezomib. The median age was 67 years, 86% were Caucasian, 33% had high risk cytogenetics, 28% had previous anti-CD38 antibodies and approximately 60% of patients had Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation (ASCT). The Primary Endpoint was Progression-Free Survival (PFS) evaluated by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) and Secondary Endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients achieving Partial Response (PR) or better according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, Duration of Response and Safety.

At a median follow-up of 21.8 months, the median PFS was not reached (NR) in the BPd arm versus 12.7 months in the PVd arm (HR=0.52; P<0.001). The 12-month estimated PFS rate was 71% with BPd versus 51% with PVd. The ORR in the BPd group was 77% and in the PVd group was 72%. The Complete Response (CR) or better was 40% in the BPd group and 16% in the PVd group, and the median Duration of Response was Not Reported with BPd versus 17.5 months with PVd. With regards to Overall Survival, a positive trend favoring BPd was observed (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.53-1.14), although data were immature at the time of analysis. Follow-up for OS is ongoing.

Adverse Events occurred in more than 99% of patients in the BPd arm and 96% in the PVd arm. Ocular adverse events were common with BPd (89%, Grade 3/4 in 43%) versus PVd (30%, Grade 3/4 in 2%). These adverse events were mitigated by Belantamab mafodotin dose modifications. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 9% of patients in the BPd arm versus none in the PVd arm.

In summary, the DREAMM-8 trial provides robust evidence of the clinical efficacy and safety of Belantamab mafodotin in combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients, addressing the critical need for effective therapies post-Lenalidomide exposure. Despite higher rates of ocular adverse events with Belantamab mafodotin, these toxicities can be effectively managed with dose adjustments, ensuring continued patient safety and treatment compliance.

Results from the randomized phase 3 DREAMM-8 study of belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (BPd) vs pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Trudel S, Beksac M, Pour L, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA105). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA105

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Long Term Outcomes with LORBRENA® in ALK-Positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

The discovery of chromosomal rearrangements of the Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) gene in some patients with advanced NSCLC and adenocarcinoma histology, and their sensitivity to ALK inhibitors, paved the way to the development of small-molecule ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. It has become clear that appropriate, molecularly targeted therapy for tumors with a molecular abnormality, results in the best outcomes. According to the US Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC), two thirds of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung, have a molecular driver abnormality. The most common oncogenic drivers in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung are, KRAS in 25%, EGFR in 21% and ALK in 8%, as well as other mutations in BRAF, HER2, AKT1 and fusions involving RET, NTRK and ROS oncogenes. These mutations are mutually exclusive, and the presence of two simultaneous mutations, are rare.

ALK inhibitors include first-generation XALKORI® (Crizotinib) and second-generation ALK inhibitors such as ZYKADIA® (Ceritinib), ALECENSA® (Alectinib) and ALUNBRIG® (Brigatinib). Despite the improved efficacy of second-generation ALK inhibitors, recurrent disease due to drug resistance including CNS disease progression can still develop.

Lorlatinib (LORBRENA®) is a novel third-generation ALK inhibitor that is more potent than second-generation inhibitors, and has the broadest coverage of ALK resistance mutations that have been identified. Lorlatinib crosses the blood-brain barrier and has marked intracranial activity in previously treated patients with baseline CNS disease, including leptomeningeal disease.

The CROWN study is an ongoing, multicenter, global, open-label, randomized Phase III trial, conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of Lorlatinib versus Crizotinib in treatment-naive patients with advanced Stage IIIB/IV or recurrent ALK-positive NSCLC. In this study, 296 eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily (N=149) versus Crizotinib 250 mg orally twice daily (N=147) in cycles of 28 days. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Eligible patients were required to have ALK-positive tumors detected by the Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx assay. Patients with asymptomatic treated or untreated CNS metastases were eligible and had to have at least one extracranial measurable target lesion that had not been previously irradiated. Patients were stratified according to the presence of brain metastases and ethnic group (Asian or non-Asian) and crossover between the treatment groups was not permitted. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary end points included independently assessed Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and intracranial objective response, time to intracranial progression, Duration of Response, and duration of intracranial response. At a planned interim analysis, treatment with Lorlatinib resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as assessed by BICR, with a Hazard Ratio of 0.28 (P<0.001), corresponding to a 72% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. The median PFS was Not Reached in the Lorlatinib arm and was 9.3 months for those treated with Crizotinib. Based on these results, the FDA in 2021, the FDA granted regular approval to Lorlatinib for patients with previously untreated, advanced metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors are ALK-positive.

Given that the median PFS was Not Reached (NR) after 3 years of follow-up, the researchers conducted this post hoc analysis of the Phase III CROWN study, to evaluate the long-term outcomes of Lorlatinib versus Crizotinib at the clinically meaningful landmark follow-up of 5 years, and updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses.

With a median follow-up for PFS of 60.2 months for Lorlatinib and 55.1 months for Crizotinib, the median PFS was Not Reached (NR) with Lorlatinib after 5 years and was 9.1 months with Crizotinib (HR=0.19; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.27), The 5-year PFS was 60% and 8% respectively. This represents the longest reported PFS with any molecular targeted therapy in advanced NSCLC and across metastatic solid tumors. The median time to intracranial progression was NR with Lorlatinib and 16.4 months with Crizotinib (HR=0.06; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.12). New ALK resistance mutations were not detected in circulating tumor DNA collected at the end of Lorlatinib treatment.

The confirmed ORR by investigator assessment was 81% with Lorlatinib and 63% with Crizotinib and the median Duration of Response was NR and 9.2 months respectively. In patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable baseline brain metastases, intracranial objective response was also greater with Lorlatinib than with Crizotinib (60% versus 11%, respectively) and intracranial complete response was reported in 49% and 5% of patients, respectively. The median duration of intracranial response was NR with Lorlatinib and 12.8 months with Crizotinib.

Treatment related Grade 3-4 adverse events were noted in 66% of patients in the Lorlatinib group and 39% of patients in the Crizotinib group leading to dose reduction in 21% and 13% respectively. However, dose reduction did not impact median PFS or time to intracranial progression in these patients.

In summary, the CROWN study represents a pivotal trial that establishes Lorlatinib as a milestone in ALK-targeted therapy, providing unprecedented Progression Free Survival and intracranial efficacy in treatment-naive patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, setting a new standard in the treatment landscape of this disease. Overall Survival data were not mature at the time of this analysis and continued research into optimal sequencing of ALK inhibitors and exploration of biomarkers are essential to predict treatment response and resistance.

Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study. Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA8503). DOI:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA8503

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: KRAZATI® Superior to Docetaxel in KRAS G12C Mutated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers.

The KRAS (kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) proto-oncogene encodes a protein that is a member of the small GTPase super family. The KRAS gene provides instructions for making the KRAS protein, which is a part of a signaling pathway known as the RAS/MAPK pathway. By relaying signals from outside the cell to the cell nucleus, the protein instructs the cell to grow, divide and differentiate. The KRAS protein is a GTPase, and converts GTP into GDP. To transmit signals, the KRAS protein must be turned on by binding to a molecule of GTP. When GTP is converted to GDP, the KRAS protein is turned off or inactivated, and when the KRAS protein is bound to GDP, it does not relay signals to the cell nucleus. The KRAS gene is in the Ras family of oncogenes, which also includes two other genes, HRAS and NRAS. When mutated, oncogenes have the potential to change normal cells cancerous.

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers and are often associated with resistance to targeted therapies and poor outcomes. The KRAS G12C mutation occurs in approximately 25% of Non Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLC) and in 3-5% of colorectal cancers and other solid cancers. KRAS G12C is one of the most prevalent driver mutations in NSCLC and accounts for a greater number of patients than those with ALK, ROS1, RET, and TRK 1/2/3 mutations combined. KRAS G12C cancers are genomically more heterogeneous and occur more frequently in current or former smokers, and are likely to be more complex genomically than EGFR mutant or ALK rearranged cancers. G12C is a single point mutation with a Glycine-to-Cysteine substitution at codon 12. This substitution favors the activated state of KRAS, resulting in a predominantly GTP-bound KRAS oncoprotein, amplifying signaling pathways that lead to oncogenesis.

Adagrasib (KRAZATI®) is a potent, orally available, small molecule covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C. This drug irreversibly and selectively binds KRAS G12C in its inactive, GDP-bound state. Unlike Sotorasib (LUMAKRAS®), which is also a selective covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C, Adagrasib has a longer drug half-life of 23 hours, as compared to 5 hours for Sotorasib, has dose-dependent extended exposure, and can penetrate the CNS. Approximately, 27-42% of patients with NSCLC harboring KRAS G12C mutations have CNS metastases, with poor outcomes. The U.S. FDA granted accelerated approval for Adagrasib as a targeted treatment for patients with KRASG12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have received at least one prior systemic therapy in December 2022.

KRYSTAL-12 trial is a pivotal, open-label, multicenter, randomized, Phase III study designed to compare Adagrasib against standard-of-care chemotherapy (Docetaxel) in patients with KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC who had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy concurrently or sequentially with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. In this study, 453 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either Adagrasib 600 mg orally twice a day (N=301) or Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks (N=152). Importantly, patients in the Docetaxel arm had the option to crossover to Adagrasib upon confirmed disease progression. Patients were stratified by region (non-Asia Pacific versus Asia Pacific) and by whether they received concurrent or sequential chemoimmunotherapy. Patients with stable brain metastases were allowed. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 64.5 years, 95% of patients had adenocarcinoma histology with metastatic disease and approximately 75% of patients were former smokers and previously received concurrent chemoimmunotherapy. The Primary endpoint of the study was Progression Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR), Safety assessments and Patient-Reported Outcomes. At the time of this analysis, 29% of patients had crossed over from Docetaxel treatment to receive Adagrasib.

With a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the trial met its Primary endpoint, with Adagrasib demonstrating a significant improvement in PFS over Docetaxel (median PFS 5.5 versus 3.8 months; HR=0.58, P<0.0001). The benefit of Adagrasib over Docetaxel was maintained across key subgroups. The ORR was also significantly higher with Adagrasib compared with Docetaxel (32% versus 9%; Odds Ratio 4.68; P<0.0001). The median Duration of Response was 8.3 months versus 5.4 months respectively, and responses were sustained at least 6 months in 64% and 39% of patients, respectively. Among those patients with CNS metastases at baseline, intracranial responses were observed in 24% of patients receiving Adagrasib and 11% of patients receiving Docetaxel, with intracranial Disease Control Rate of 82% and 56%, respectively. There was also a significant benefit in the Patient-Reported Outcomes of median time to deterioration. There were no new safety signals noted with Adagrasib and the safety data was consistent with the known safety profile. Grade 3 or more treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47% of patients treated with Adagrasib and 45.7% of patients treated with Docetaxel and treatment discontinuation rates were 7.7% versus 14.3%, respectively.

In summary, the KRYSTAL-12 trial confirmed Adagrasib as a superior treatment option compared to Docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Adagrasib significantly improved Progression Free Survival, Overall Response Rate, and Duration of Response, with a notable impact on intracranial disease control rates. Its safety profile was manageable, aligning with expectations from earlier studies. These findings underscore the potential of Adagrasib in this patient population and highlight ongoing research efforts to further optimize treatment strategies in this challenging patient population.

KRYSTAL-12: Phase 3 study of adagrasib versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a KRASG12C mutation. Mok TSK, Yao W, Duruisseaux M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA8509.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: ENHERTU® Improves PFS in HR-Positive, HER2-Low and HER-Ultralow Metastatic Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the US, approximately 310,720 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2024, and about 42,250 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence.

The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. Patients with high levels of HER2 expression (IHC 3+ or 2+/FISH+) are classified as HER2-positive. Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer are often treated with anti-HER2 targeted therapy along with chemotherapy, irrespective of hormone receptor status, and this has resulted in significantly improved treatment outcomes. Tumors that are not classified as HER2-positive are classified as HER2-negative. Despite being classified as HER2-negative, majority these tumors still have some level of HER2 expression.

About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. It is estimated that approximately 60-65% of HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers are HER2-low and potentially an additional 25% may be HER2-ultralow. These patients are often treated with single agent endocrine therapy, endocrine therapy in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitor, or chemotherapy. Resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients and there is therefore an unmet need for agents with novel mechanisms of action. Further, there are no targeted therapies specifically approved for patients with HER2-low or HER2-ultralow expression, prior to chemotherapy.

ENHERTU® (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting HER2, with the amino acid sequence similar to Trastuzumab, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a potent cytotoxic Topoisomerase I inhibitor as the cytotoxic drug (payload). ENHERTU® has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the tetrapeptide-based linker is stable in the plasma and is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are up-regulated in tumor cells. Unlike KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine), another ADC targeting HER2, ENHERTU® has a higher drug-to-antibody ratio (8 versus 4), released payload easily crosses the cell membrane with resulting potent cytotoxic effect on neighboring tumor cells regardless of target expression, and the released cytotoxic agent (payload) has a short half-life, thus minimizing systemic exposure.

DESTINY-Breast06 is a global, randomized, open-label Phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ENHERTU® versus chemotherapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-low, or HER2-ultralow advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This study enrolled 866 patients (N=713 for HER2-low and N=153 for HER2-ultralow). HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+ or FISH negative and HER2-ultralow was defined as IHC 0 with membrane staining. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ENHERTU® 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks (N=436) or physicians choice of chemotherapy which included Capecitabine, Paclitaxel, or nab-Paclitaxel (N=430). Patients in the trial had no prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease and received at least two lines of prior endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting. Patients were also eligible if they had received one prior line of endocrine therapy combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the metastatic setting and experienced disease progression within six months of starting 1st-line treatment, or received endocrine therapy as an adjuvant treatment and experienced disease recurrence within 24 months. Patients were stratified based on prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use, HER2 expression and prior taxane use in the non-metastatic setting. Patients in the trial had received a median of two prior lines of endocrine therapy. In the overall trial population, 14.9% of patients in the ENHERTU® group and 19.2% in the chemotherapy group had received one prior line of endocrine therapy. No patients had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the HER2-low patient population as measured by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Key Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the overall trial population (HER2-low and HER2-ultralow), Overall survival (OS) in the HER2-low patient population, Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of response (DOR) and Safety. The median duration of follow-up was 18.2 months.

In the primary analysis of this study, results showed that in the HER2-low expression patients, ENHERTU® reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 38%, with a median PFS was 13.2 months in the ENHERTU® group, compared to 8.1 months for chemotherapy (HR=0.62; P<0.0001). For the overall trial population (HER2-low and HER2-ultralow), the median PFS results were similar and the median PFS was 13.2 months for ENHERTU® versus 8.1 months for chemotherapy (HR=0.63; P<0.0001). ENHERTU® reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 37% compared to chemotherapy.

A prespecified exploratory analysis showed that the improvement in PFS was consistent between patients with HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression. In patients with HER2-ultralow expression, ENHERTU® reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 22% compared to chemotherapy, with a median PFS of 13.2 months versus 8.3 months, respectively (HR=0.78).

The Objective Response Rate (ORR) in HER2-Low Population was 56.5% for ENHERTU® compared to 32.2% for chemotherapy, in the Overall Trial Population was 57.3% for ENHERTU® versus 31.2% for chemotherapy, and in the HER2-Ultralow Subgroup was 61.8% for ENHERTU® versus 26.3% for chemotherapy. The median duration of response across these three groups was 14.3 months.

The safety profile of ENHERTU® was consistent with previous breast cancer clinical trials and no new safety concerns identified. The most common Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurring in 5% or more of patients treated with ENHERTU® were neutropenia (20.7%) and anemia (5.8%). Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), adjudicated as drug-related by an independent committee, occurred in 11.3% of patients treated with ENHERTU®. The majority of ILD events were low grade.

The results from the DESTINY-Breast06 trial underscore the significant clinical benefits of ENHERTU® in improving PFS and ORR in patients with HR-positive, HER2-low, and HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer, offering a promising alternative to standard chemotherapy. These findings highlight the potential of ENHERTU® to become a new standard of care for this patient population, pending further investigation and regulatory approval. The detailed positive outcomes underscore the clinical benefits and reinforce the promise of ENHERTU® in treating this challenging cancer subtype.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs physician’s choice of chemotherapy (TPC) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with prior endocrine therapy (ET): Primary results from DESTINY-Breast06 (DB-06). Curigliano G, Hu X, Dent RA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA1000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1000.