Category: Hem/Onc Updates

TAGRISSO® after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Approximately one third of all patients with NSCLC have Stage III, locally advanced disease at the time of initial presentation and 60 to 90% of these patients have unresectable disease. These patients are treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation therapy with Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) in patients without progression, as this regimen confers an Overall Survival advantage, and is considered the standard of care (PACIFIC trial).

EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations are found in up to one third of patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC. There are currently no approved targeted treatments for patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The current standard of care, which includes consolidation therapy with Durvalumab, may not offer clear benefits to this subset of patients with EGFR mutations.

Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a highly selective third-generation, irreversible Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), presently approved by the FDA, for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors have Exon 19 deletions or Exon 21 L858R mutations, as well as treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR-TKI therapy. Osimertinib is also approved by the FDA as adjuvant treatment for resected Stage IB–IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Further, Osimertinib has higher CNS penetration and is therefore able to induce responses in 70-90% of patients with brain metastases.

LAURA was a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III trial conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Osimertinib in patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations (EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation). The trial enrolled patients who had not experienced disease progression during or after definitive platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). A total of 216 patients who had undergone CRT were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive Osimertinib 80 mg orally once daily (N=143) or placebo once per day (N=73). Treatment was continued until Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)–assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria were met. Upon disease progression, patients in the placebo arm were permitted to receive Osimertinib, allowing for crossover therapy. Stratification factors included method of CRT (concurrent versus sequential) and disease Stage (IIIA versus IIIB/C). Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 63 years, approximately 60% of participants were female, 83% were Asian, 69% had never smoked and 85% had Stage IIIA and B disease. Majority of patients received concurrent CRT rather than sequential CRT. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by BICR. Key Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), survival without progression of CNS disease (CNS Progression Free Survival), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, Quality of Life, and Safety.

Treatment with Osimertinib resulted in significant PFS improvement compared to placebo. The median PFS was 39.1 months in the Osimertinib group versus 5.6 months in the placebo group, representing an 84% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR=0.16; P<0.001). Additionally, a higher percentage of patients in the Osimertinib group remained alive and progression-free at 12 months compared to the placebo group (74% versus 22% respectively). Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the consistency of treatment effects across various demographic and clinical factors. The benefits of Osimertinib were observed across all prespecified subgroups, indicating a consistent treatment effect, regardless of patient characteristics. The incidence of new lesions was lower with Osimertinib compared to placebo (22% versus 68%), and this included new brain lesions (8% versus 29%) and new lung lesions (6% versus 29%) respectively. The Objective Response Rate was higher with Osimertinib than with placebo (57% versus 33%). The median Duration of Response was longer with Osimertinib (36.9 months) than with placebo (6.5 months). Interim OS data showed a favorable trend for Osimertinib, although maturity was limited at the time of analysis. Further follow-up will be conducted to assess OS as a secondary endpoint. The adverse event profile of Osimertinib was generally consistent with previous studies. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred more frequently in the Osimertinib group, with radiation pneumonitis being the most common. However, no new safety concerns emerged during the trial.

In summary, treatment with Osimertinib resulted in significantly longer Progression Free Survival than placebo in patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC following definitive CRT, and should be considered the new standard of care for this group of patients. Overall, the LAURA study represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of EGFR-mutated Stage III NSCLC, addressing an unmet need for targeted therapies in this setting. Further follow-up will provide additional insights into the long-term efficacy and safety of Osimertinib in this patient population.

Osimertinib after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC. Lu S, Kato T, Dong X, et al. for the LAURA Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2024;391:585-597

Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab: A Breakthrough in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States for 2024, about 83,190 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed and approximately 16,840 patients will die of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but it is less common in women. Bladder cancer accounts for 90% of urothelial cancers, and urothelial cancer can also be found in the renal pelvis, ureter and urethra. Approximately 12% of urothelial cancer cases at diagnosis are locally advanced or metastatic.

Patients with urothelial carcinoma are currently treated in the first line setting with a Platinum based chemotherapy regimen, and a checkpoint Inhibitor (PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor) in the second line setting. However, approximately 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma are ineligible for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy due to toxicities, and responses are rarely durable. There is therefore a critical need for effective and tolerable first line treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (PADCEV®) is a first-in-class Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets Nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule highly expressed in urothelial cancers and other solid tumors. Nectin-4 has been implicated in tumor cell growth and proliferation. Following binding to Nectin-4 on the cell surface, Enfortumab vedotin becomes internalized and is processed by lysosomes, with the liberation of its cytotoxic payload, MonoMethyl Auristatin E (MMAE), which in turn disrupts microtubule assembly, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Enfortumab vedotin resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, and a higher Overall Response Rate, than standard chemotherapy, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who had previously received Platinum-based treatment and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Preclinical studies with Enfortumab vedotin have shown hallmarks of immune cell death potentially augmented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and the rationale for this clinical trial was based on results from a previous cohort study.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. Pembrolizumab is the first agent to improve Overall Survival over chemotherapy, in the second line setting, for patients with recurrent, advanced urothelial carcinoma, and a significant proportion of patients who respond, have very durable responses.

EV-302 is a landmark Phase III, global, open-label, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Enfortumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy, in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. A total of 886 eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of Enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 and Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of every 3-week cycle (N=442) or chemotherapy consisting of Gemcitabine and either Cisplatin or Carboplatin (N=444), determined on the basis of eligibility to receive cisplatin, for a maximum of 6 cycles. The maximum number of Pembrolizumab cycles allowed was 35 and there was no maximum number of cycles set for Enfortumab vedotin. The treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 69 yrs and randomization was stratified according to eligibility to receive Cisplatin (eligible or ineligible), PD-L1 expression status (High-CPS 10 or more versus Low-CPS less than 10), and liver metastases (present or absent). The co-Primary end points were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary end points included Overall Response Rate (ORR) as assessed by BICR, Duration of Response, and Safety. As of the data cutoff date, the median duration of follow-up for survival was 17.2 months.

The PFS was significantly longer in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group compared to the chemotherapy group (median duration 12.5 months versus 6.3 months; HR=0.45; P<0.001), representing a 55% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab also substantially improved median OS, and the median OS was 31.5 months compared to 16.1 months with chemotherapy (HR=0.47; P<0.001) representing a 53% reduction in the risk of death. These PFS and OS benefits were consistent between the intention-to-treat population and all the prespecified subgroups, including those defined according to Cisplatin eligibility status and PD-L1 expression status. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group was 67.7%, significantly higher than the 44.4% ORR observed with chemotherapy alone (P<0.001), with a Complete Response rate of 29.1% versus 12.5% respectively. The median Duration of Response was Not Reached in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group and was 7.0 months in the chemotherapy group.

Treatment-related adverse events of Grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.9% of the patients in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group, and was 69.5% in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group were peripheral sensory neuropathy, pruritus and alopecia, whereas the most common such events in the chemotherapy group were anemia, neutropenia and nausea.

It was concluded that treatment with Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab resulted in significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, emerging as a potential new standard of care, irrespective of Cisplatin eligibility. The results from this study mark a significant paradigm shift in the management of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, offering new hope for patients and clinicians alike.

Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer. Powles T, Valderrama BP, Gupta S, et al. for the EV-302 Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2024;390:875-888.

Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer with an Exosome-Based Liquid Biopsy

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2024, about 66,440 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 51,750 people will die of the disease. Detecting cancer at early stages can significantly increase survival rates and outcomes.

Several multi-cancer early detection tests are being developed that involve blood-based circulating cell-free tumor DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma, to track hundreds of patient-specific mutations, to detect Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) , as well as detection of abnormal methylation patterns, followed by machine learning approaches, to differentiate between cancer and non-cancer for detecting clinically significant, late-stage (III and IV) cancers. Early detection of cancer, however, is the key to improving survival. This is particularly relevant for certain cancer types. Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and a leading cause of all cancer-related deaths in the United States and is typically detected when the disease is advanced. However, when detected at Stage I, survival rates can be as high as 80%. Even though serum CA19-9 is intended as an aid in the management of patients with confirmed pancreatic cancer for serial monitoring of their response to therapy and disease progression, it is NOT recommended by the FDA for screening, as it may be elevated in several benign conditions. Currently, there are no general screening strategies to detect asymptomatic, early-stage PDAC and there is therefore a significant unmet need in this patient group.

Exosomes are 30-150 nm-sized Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) secreted by multiple different cell types and released by tumors into the bloodstream. They mediate intercellular signaling by shuttling mRNAs and microRNAs between distant cells and tissues and therefore carry functional protein biomarkers representing the tumor proteome. MicroRNAs play a role in regulating gene expression and have been implicated in various cancer types due to their stability and specific expression patterns associated with tumor presence. Exosomes retain the cytoplasmic content of the cell from which they were shed, essentially replicating the biology of their tissue of origin. Exosomes represent one potential approach for more sensitive detection of cancer-related biomarkers from blood.

The researchers developed an exosome-based liquid biopsy signature as a diagnostic tool to detect pancreatic cancer through the analysis of circulating biomarkers in blood samples. This signature utilizes two primary types of biomarkers – Eight microRNAs unique to exosomes shed from pancreatic cancer cells, combined with five cell-free DNA (cfDNA) markers such as mutations or alterations in DNA methylation patterns found in the blood of patients with pancreatic cancer.

In previous work, researchers had tested an exosome-based liquid biopsy signature on a cohort of 95 individuals from either the United States or Japan. This initial study reported an impressive 98% detection rate for pancreatic cancer. Building on this success, the latest research aimed to validate this liquid biopsy approach in larger, more diverse populations across multiple institutions and countries.

The most recent study involved a comprehensive, multi-cohort evaluation to assess the performance of the exosome-based liquid biopsy signature. The study enrolled participants from four countries, each contributing both pancreatic cancer patients and healthy donors:
• Japan: 150 individuals with pancreatic cancer and 102 healthy donors
• United States: 139 individuals with pancreatic cancer and 193 healthy donors
• South Korea: 184 individuals with pancreatic cancer and 86 healthy donors
• China: 50 individuals with pancreatic cancer and 80 healthy donors

The research methodology involved training the liquid biopsy signature using data from the Japanese cohort. Machine learning algorithms were likely used to train and validate the diagnostic model, optimizing its sensitivity and specificity. After training the signature on the Japanese cohort, the researchers validated its performance using data from cohorts in the United States, South Korea, and China. Each of these cohorts included a mix of pancreatic cancer patients and healthy controls, allowing for an assessment of the signature’s performance across diverse populations.

The performance of the liquid biopsy signature across different cohorts was as follows:
• United States Cohort: The test detected 93% of pancreatic cancers.
• South Korean Cohort: The test detected 91% of pancreatic cancers.
• Chinese Cohort: The test detected 88% of pancreatic cancers.

These validation results demonstrated the signatures robustness and effectiveness in detecting pancreatic cancer across different ethnic and geographic backgrounds, although there was a noted decrease in detection rates with different cohorts.

To enhance the diagnostic accuracy, the researchers combined their exosome-based signature with the traditional pancreatic cancer marker CA 19-9, a carbohydrate antigen often elevated in pancreatic cancer but is less sensitive for detecting early-stage disease. The combination of the exosome-based signature with CA 19-9 improved the detection rate of early-stage pancreatic cancers (Stage I and II) to 97% in the U.S. cohort. This suggests that the combination approach offers a more comprehensive evaluation than CA 19-9 alone.

In conclusion, the exosome-based liquid biopsy signature represents a significant advancement in the early detection of pancreatic cancer. By leveraging the unique properties of exosomal microRNAs and cfDNA, the researchers have developed a diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity. The successful validation in multiple cohorts underscores its potential utility in clinical practice. This assay may be helpful for early detection of pancreatic cancer in certain groups with a high risk for pancreatic cancer such as a family history of pancreatic cancer, germline BRCA mutations, new-onset diabetes, chronic pancreatitis or pancreas precancer lesion such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. However, addressing the limitations and further optimizing the technology will be crucial for its widespread adoption and effectiveness in diverse populations.

An exosome-based liquid biopsy for non-invasive, early detection of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multicenter and prospective study. Xu C, Xu Y, Han H, et al. AACR Annual Meeting 2024. Abstract 3899. Presented April 8, 2024.

Lung Cancer Risk with Vaping and Cigarette Smoking

RR

SUMMARY: According to the American Cancer Society, tobacco use is responsible for nearly 1 in 5 deaths in the United States and accounts for at least 30% of all cancer deaths. Smokeless tobacco products are a major source of cancer causing nitrosamines, and increase the risk of developing cancer of the oropharynx, esophagus, and pancreas. Cigarette smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic and some linked to cancer.

The use of e-cigarettes (electronic cigarettes) often referred to as “vaping” was introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 after e-cigarettes were first developed in China. When a smoker inhales through the mouth piece of an e-cigarette, the air flow triggers a sensor that switches on a small lithium battery powered heater, which in turn vaporizes liquid nicotine along with PolyEthylene Glycol (PEG) present in a small cartridge. The PEG vapor looks like smoke. The potent liquid form of nicotine extracted from tobacco is tinctured with fragrant flavors such as chocolate, cherry and bubble gum, coloring substances, as well as other chemicals and these e-liquids are powerful neurotoxins. With the rapid growth of the e-cigarette industry and the evidence of potential dangers and risk to public health, particularly children, experts from the world’s leading lung organizations were compelled to release a POSITION statement on e-cigarettes, specifically focusing on their potential adverse effects on human health, and calling on government organizations to ban or restrict the use of e-cigarettes, until their impact on health is better understood. With epidemiological data demonstrating that nicotine use is a gateway to the use of cocaine and marijuana and subsequent lifelong addiction, the Forum of International Respiratory Societies (FIRS), an organization composed of the world’s leading international respiratory societies including American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) made several important recommendations (not included here).

The health risks associated with vaping might be compounded by the presence of harmful substances in e-cigarette aerosols, such as diacetyl, diethylene glycol, aldehydes, cadmium, benzene, and heavy metals like nickel, tin, and lead. These components are known to be toxic and carcinogenic, raising concerns about their contribution to lung cancer risk.

Recent concerns have emerged about the potential health risks associated with vaping, particularly in relation to lung cancer. Although nicotine exposure from electronic delivery systems (vaping) has been linked to elevated risks of lung conditions, the impact on lung cancer risk has remained relatively unexplored. To address this gap, the researchers in this publication conducted a comprehensive case-control study at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, examining the association between vaping, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk. The researchers in this study analyzed medical records from the James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, encompassing data from 4,975 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed lung cancer between 2013 and 2021. This patient cohort was meticulously matched to 27,294 control individuals without cancer on a 5:1 ratio based on age, gender, race, and year of ascertainment. The researchers utilized descriptive statistics and performed logistic regression analyses to evaluate the associations between vaping, smoking, and lung cancer risk. This analysis aimed to determine how these factors individually and synergistically contributed to the likelihood of developing lung cancer.

The results of this analysis demonstrated that the demographic profile of the lung cancer cases showed a predominance of males (55%), with a majority being White (88%). The mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. There was a significantly higher risk of lung cancer among individuals who both vaped and smoked compared to those who only smoked. Specifically, the adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) for those who reported both vaping and smoking was 21.1 (95% CI = 17.1, 26.1), while for smoking alone, it was 6.3 (95% CI = 5.8, 6.8). Further stratification by gender and histologic cell type demonstrated that the risk associated with combined vaping and smoking was consistently over 3X higher compared to smoking alone (P<0.001). This elevated risk persisted even after adjusting for comorbidities, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and cardiovascular disease.

The researchers added that these findings underscore a markedly higher risk of lung cancer associated with the combination of vaping and smoking compared to smoking alone. This synergistic effect is reminiscent of the risks associated with known carcinogens such as radon or asbestos. The results suggest that the addition of vaping to smoking significantly accelerates the risk of developing lung cancer.

The limitations of this study are that this analysis did not include a vaping-only group, as nearly 97% of those who vaped also reported smoking. Additionally, there was no detailed temporal data on the duration and frequency of vaping versus smoking. However, the consistent significant increase in lung cancer risk observed with combined vaping and smoking indicates a potentially substantial interaction effect.

In conclusion, this case-control study provides compelling evidence suggesting that vaping combined with smoking may significantly elevate lung cancer risk. While these preliminary findings highlight the potential dangers of e-cigarettes, further research is necessary to confirm these results and explore the long-term implications of vaping on lung cancer risk. Physicians should reconsider harm-reduction messages related to vaping, as it may NOT be safer than smoking. Further studies are needed to quantify the exact risks associated with vaping and smoking, as well as to understand the long-term effects.

Vaping, smoking and lung cancer: A case-control study. Bittoni MA, Carbone D, Harris R. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract 2213.

Cannabis Use Increases the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that about 58,450 new cases of oral cavity and pharynx cancer will be diagnosed in the US in 2024 and about 12,230 patients will die of the disease. The head and neck region includes the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck accounts for about 3-5% of all cancers in the United States. Common risk factors include tobacco and alcohol use and Human PapillomaVirus (HPV) infection. Even though tobacco has long been associated with head and neck cancer development, cannabis has similar carcinogens.

Cannabis refers to all products derived from the plant Cannabis sativa, and is the most commonly used illicit substance worldwide. The cannabis plant contains about 540 chemical substances and has similar carcinogens as tobacco. Marijuana refers to the dried leaves, flowers, stems, and seeds from the plant Cannabis sativa that contain substantial amounts of TetraHydroCannabinol (THC), which is primarily responsible for the effects of marijuana on a persons mental state. Individuals with head and neck cancer have used cannabis to help alleviate pain and improve well-being. In 2022, 30.7% of 12th graders reported using marijuana in the previous year and 6.3% reported using marijuana daily. In addition, many young people also use vaping devices to consume cannabis products.

As cannabis use grows, understanding its carcinogenic potential becomes increasingly important, particularly given its rising popularity and industry expansion. Cannabis smoke may be more proinflammatory than tobacco smoke due to its unfiltered nature and higher combustion temperature. This increased inflammation could lead to cancer development. Cannabis smoke also enhances the expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), which is associated with many head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, including Laryngeal cancer. It remained unclear if cannabis use is associated with increased risk of head and neck cancer.

The researchers conducted a large-scale, retrospective cohort study over a 20 year period from April 19, 2004, to April 19, 2024, to investigate whether there is an association between cannabis use and an increased risk of head and neck cancers. Given the growing prevalence of cannabis use and its potential health effects, understanding this relationship is crucial for public health. In this study, clinical records of 116,076 U.S. adults with and without cannabis-related disorders who had outpatient hospital clinic visits and no prior history of head and neck cancers were extracted from a database covering 64 healthcare organizations across the United States. The mean age of 46.4 years, 44.5% were women and 60% white. Cannabis-related disorder was defined as excessive cannabis use leading to psychosocial symptoms, including impaired occupational or social functioning. The control cohort consisted of 3,985,286 individuals with a mean age of 60.8 years (54.5% women, 74.6% white), with no cannabis-related disorder. Participants were matched for age, race, tobacco use, and alcohol-related disorders. Relative risks (RRs) for head and neck cancers and subtypes were calculated, with stratified analysis for those younger and older than 60 years.

It was noted that Individuals with cannabis-related disorder had a significantly higher risk of developing any type of head and neck cancer, compared to those without such disorders. Specifically, the risk for any head and neck cancer was 3.49 times greater in the cannabis-related disorder group. A site-specific analysis yielded that among those with cannabis-related disorder, Laryngeal cancer risk was 8.39 times higher, Oropharyngeal cancer risk was 4.9 times higher, Salivary gland cancer risk was 2.7 times higher, Nasopharyngeal cancer risk was 2.6 times higher and Oral cancer risk was 2.51 times higher. Risks were consistent across different age groups. Elevated risks persisted when cancer diagnoses were considered at least one year or five years after the initial cannabis use, indicating a sustained risk over time.

One of the study limitations was that the study did not capture information on the frequency, quantity, or type of cannabis use, which are crucial for understanding the dose-response relationship.

In conclusion, this study confirms a significant association between cannabis-related disorder and an increased risk of head and neck cancers, particularly Laryngeal and Oropharyngeal cancers. Future studies should focus on understanding the mechanisms behind this association and investigate the impact of cannabis use dose and duration on cancer risk. More comprehensive data collection and analysis are necessary to solidify these findings and inform public health recommendations.

Cannabis Use and Head and Neck Cancer. Gallagher TJ, Chung RS, Lin ME, et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online August 8, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2419.

FDA Approves LYMPHIR® for Relapsed and Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on August 7, 2024 approved LYMPHIR® (Denileukin diftitox-cxdl), a novel immunotherapy for the treatment of relaped/refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) after at least one prior systemic therapy.

Primary Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma is a type of Non Hodgkin Lymphoma and includes a spectrum of diseases that primarily involve the skin, but may ultimately involve lymph nodes, blood and visceral organs such as spleen, liver and lungs. CTCL initially presents as red, scaly, itchy patches on the skin and is often misdiagnosed as eczema. Approximately 3,000 new cases are reported in the United States every year, with an estimated 30,000 – 40,000 individuals living with the disease. The incidence is higher in blacks than Caucasians or Asians. It is more common in men, and is typically first diagnosed in patients between the ages of 50 and 60 years of age. Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome is the most common type of CTCL. There is currently no curative therapy for advanced CTCL other than Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Patients often receive several skin-directed therapies as well as systemic therapies to achieve effective disease control, but the disease eventually becomes refractory. There is therefore an unmet clinical need for novel therapies.

Denileukin diftitox is a recombinant fusion protein composed of Interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor binding domain and diphtheria toxin fragments. It selectively targets IL-2 receptor-expressing cells, causing diphtheria toxin fragments that have entered cells to inhibit protein synthesis, leading to apoptosis. Its unique mechanism of action targets both malignant T-cells and immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells (Tregs). Transiently eliminating Tregs has the potential of unleashing potent immune responses by the immune system of the patient against their tumors. This agent was approved and marketed as ONTAK® in the US from 1999-2014 for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CTCL. However, the product was withdrawn from the market in 2014 because of manufacturing issues related to its bacterial expression. Manufacturing improvements to decrease the presence of misfolded and aggregated proteins resulted in a new and more purified bioactive formulation LYMPHIR®, that has 1.5-2 times greater specific bioactivity in non-clinical assays compared with ONTAK®. It is considered a new drug by the FDA, requiring a new registrational clinical trial.

The efficacy and safety of LYMPHIR® was assessed in a multicenter, open-label, Phase III Pivotal Study 302 of CTCL patients, who had previously received at least one systemic treatment. This analysis included 69 patients (N=69) with Stage I-III CTCL who had CD25 expression on at least 20% of biopsied malignant cells per immunohistochemistry and had received a median four prior therapies. The median age was 64 years, 65% were men, 73% were White and 19% were African American, 66 patients had Mycosis fungoides and 3 had Sezary syndrome. Approximately 30% had Stage I disease, 48% had Stage II disease and 22% had Stage III disease. Patients received LYMPHIR® 9 mcg/kg/day for 5 days, every 21 days for up to 8 cycles. The Primary efficacy outcome measure was Objective Response Rate (ORR), as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).

The Objective Response Rate was 36.2%, with 8.7% achieving a Complete Response. The median time to response was 1.41 months, with 70% of responders seeing results after 1-2 cycles of treatment. Duration of response was at least 6 months for 52% of the patients and 84% (54/64) of skin evaluable patients had a decrease in skin tumor burden, and 12.5% (8/64) saw complete clearing of skin disease. Pruritis was evaluated as an exploratory endpoint with 31.7% of patients demonstrating clinically significant pruritus improvement. Importantly, no cumulative toxicity was observed in patients receiving LYMPHIR®.

The safety profile of LYMPHIR® was consistent with the known safety profile for Denileukin diftitox. Across three studies of 119 CTCL patients receiving 9 μg dose of Denileukin diftitox, the most common (20% or more) adverse reactions including laboratory abnormalities were, infusion reactions, increased transaminases, decreased albumin, nausea, edema, anemia, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, rash, chills, constipation, pyrexia, blurred vision and Capillary Leak Syndrome (CLS). Infusion reactions, CLS, and visual impairment were mostly Grade 1/2 and effectively managed.

In conclusion, LYMPHIR® represents a significant advancement in treating Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma, especially for patients who have not responded well to previous treatments. As the first systemic option in years targeting the IL-2 receptor on malignant T-cells and Tregs, LYMPHIR® provides new hope for managing the long-term challenges of CTCL, such as severe skin symptoms and secondary infections. This development moves us closer to addressing the needs of CTCL patients who struggle with ongoing disease despite prior therapies.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/761312s000lbl.pdf

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Docetaxel may be Preferable Taxane for Black Women to Mitigate Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

RR

SUMMARY: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a notable side effect associated with taxane chemotherapy agents, particularly Paclitaxel, and has significant implications for patient quality of life and treatment outcomes. Notably, Black women with early-stage breast cancer exhibit a disproportionately higher incidence of TIPN compared to their White counterparts. This disparity is critical, as TIPN can lead to increased dose reductions, which in turn may adversely affect treatment efficacy and long-term cure rates.

Historically, retrospective analyses, such as those from the ECOG-ACRIN-E5103 trial, revealed that Black patients experience more severe TIPN and subsequent dose reductions when treated with weekly Paclitaxel. This pattern was less pronounced in patients treated with every 3 week Docetaxel. Additionally, genetic studies identified specific germline variants associated with a heightened risk of severe TIPN in individuals of African ancestry. These findings prompted the need for a prospective trial to validate these genetic markers and to evaluate the comparative tolerability of Paclitaxel versus Docetaxel specifically in Black women.

The EAZ171 study was designed with several key objectives. It aimed to prospectively validate whether specific germline genetic variants are associated with a higher risk of TIPN in Black women. The focus was on genetic variants in the SBF2 and FCAMR genes. The Secondary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of TIPN and the frequency of dose reductions between two taxanes—weekly Paclitaxel and every 3 week Docetaxel, in a cohort of Black women with early-stage breast cancer.

This study included 249 Black women who self-identified as such and were scheduled to receive either Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly for 12 doses (N=121) or Docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles (N=128). The study utilized a pragmatic design where the choice of taxane was based on physician discretion and patient-specific disease characteristics, rather than a randomized design. Patients could also receive Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Trastuzumab, and/or Pertuzumab per institution routine care, per treating physician discretion. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Participants were genotyped to identify genetic variants associated with neuropathy risk. Those with FCAMR homozygous wild type or SBF2 mutations were categorized as high risk, while those with variant alleles in FCAMR and wild type SBF2 were categorized as low risk. The incidence of Grade 2-4 TIPN was evaluated using physician-reported CTCAE v.5, while patient-reported outcomes were assessed through PRO-CTCAE, FACT/GOG-NTx, and EORTC CIPN20 questionnaires.

The key findings were:

Genetic Predictors: Germline variations did not significantly influence the risk of TIPN for either treatment group. The anticipated differences in TIPN based on genetic risk did not reach statistical significance.

TIPN Incidence: Grade 2-4 TIPN was notably higher in the Paclitaxel group compared to the Docetaxel group. Physician-reported TIPN was 45% in the Paclitaxel arm versus 29% in the Docetaxel arm (P=0.02). Similarly, patient-reported TIPN symptoms were 40% with Paclitaxel versus 24% with Docetaxel (P=0.03).

Dose Reductions: Patients receiving Paclitaxel experienced more frequent dose reductions due to TIPN (28% vs. 9%, p<0.001) and for any cause (39% vs. 25%, p=0.02) compared to those receiving Docetaxel.

Patient-Reported Outcomes: The trends in worsening neuropathy scores over time were similar between the two arms, but significant differences were not observed at the one-year mark.

In summary, the EAZ171 study provided crucial insights into the management of TIPN in Black women with early-stage breast cancer. Despite the lack of significant impact from genetic markers, the clear advantage of Docetaxel over Paclitaxel in terms of lower incidence of severe TIPN and fewer dose reductions underscores its potential as a preferable taxane for this patient population. This trial results advocate for considering Docetaxel in treatment regimens for Black women to mitigate TIPN-related complications and possibly enhance treatment outcomes. The findings emphasize the need for tailored treatment strategies to improve health equity and therapeutic efficacy in breast cancer care.

ECOG-ACRIN EAZ171: Prospective validation trial of germline variants and taxane type in association with taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) in Black women with early-stage breast cancer. Ballinger TJ, Zhao F, Sparano JA, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA503). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA503

Five Year Outcomes with First Line OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® and a Limited Course of Chemotherapy

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the immune system T cells. Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors include CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152) and PD-1(Programmed cell Death 1). Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response.

Nivolumab (OPDIVO®) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the T cells. Ipilimumab (YERVOY®) is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks Immune checkpoint protein/receptor CTLA-4. In the CheckMate-227, Part 1, Phase III trial, a combination of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab significantly improved Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rates (ORR) and Duration of Response, compared to chemotherapy, independent of PD-L1 expression level. The authors in this study hypothesized that a limited course of chemotherapy combined with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab could provide rapid disease control, while building on the durable Overall Survival benefit seen with dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition, as well as minimizing the toxicities associated with a full course of chemotherapy.

CheckMate-9LA is a pivotal, randomized, open-label, global, multi-center, Phase III trial, designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic NSCLC. In this study, 719 adults treatment naïve patients with histological confirmed Stage IV/recurrent NSCLC, with ECOG Performance Status 0-1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either Nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks IV plus Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy (N=361), or 4 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone (N=358). Chemotherapy was based on histology. Patients with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-only randomized group could receive optional Pemetrexed maintenance treatment. Patients were treated with immunotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for 2 years. Patients were stratified by PD-L1 status (less than 1% versus 1% or more), sex, and histology (squamous versus non-squamous). Demographics in treatment groups were well balanced. Crossover between treatment groups was not permitted. However, at physician discretion, patients could receive subsequent immunotherapy upon discontinuation of study treatment in either group. The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR) and efficacy by PD-L1 subgroups. Exploratory Endpoints included Treatment-Free Interval (TFI), efficacy in patients who discontinued due to Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs), and outcomes among 5-year survivors. This trial met its Primary and Secondary endpoints, showing statistically significant improvements in OS, PFS, and Objective Response Rate (ORR), when compared to chemotherapy alone. This clinical benefit was noted across tumor PD-L1 expression levels and histology. The researchers herein reported updated efficacy and safety data with a 5-year follow up, and outcomes in 5-year survivors.

At a median follow up of 64.5 months, the combination of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and chemotherapy demonstrated a continued survival benefit over chemotherapy alone. The 5-year OS rate was 18% for the experimental group compared to 11% for the control group, with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.73. In patients with tumor PD-L1 expression less than 1%, a subgroup with historically poorer outcomes, the 5-year OS rate was 22% in the experimental group versus 8% in the control group (HR=0.63). The 5-year PFS rate in this subgroup was also significantly better with Nivolumab plus Iipilimumab and chemotherapy (9% versus 3%).

The median DOR in the experimental arm was 12.4 months compared to 5.6 months in the control arm. The 5-year DOR rates were 19% for the experimental group and 8% for the control group. Regarding Treatment-Free Interval (TFI), among patients who survived to 5 years, 72% of those in the experimental group were treatment-free compared to 35% in the control group. The TFI rates underscore the durability of the response achieved with the combination therapy.

In Squamous NSCLC patients, the median OS was 14.5 months with the experimental regimen compared to 9.1 months with chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.63). For non-squamous NSCLC patients, the median OS was 17.8 months versus 12.0 months (HR, 0.77). In patients with PD-L1 expression less than 1%, the experimental regimen had a median OS of 17.7 months compared to 9.8 months for the control group. For those with PD-L1 expression 1% or greater, the median OS was 15.8 months versus 10.9 months. Among patients who discontinued the experimental regimen due to TRAEs (N=61), 37% were alive at 5 years. The median OS in this subgroup was 27.5 months, with a 5-year OS rate of 37%.

No new safety signals emerged with extended follow up. Grade 3 and 4 immune-mediated AEs were relatively low across different Ipilimumab dosing groups. The most common severe AEs were hepatitis, rash, pneumonitis, and adrenal insufficiency, with incidence varying by the number of Ipilimumab doses.

Exploratory Analyses suggested that among the 5-year survivors, the median PFS was not reached in the experimental group compared to 16.8 months in the control group (HR, 0.52). The ORR at 5 years was 73% in the experimental group versus 60% in the control group.

In conclusion, the 5-year follow-up results from the CheckMate -9LA trial reinforce the long-term efficacy of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC. The combination therapy not only improved OS and PFS compared to chemotherapy alone, but also showed a significant benefit in patients with low PD-L1 expression and Squamous histology. The extended follow-up underscores the durability of the response and supports the combination as a robust treatment option for patients with metastatic NSCLC, with manageable safety profiles over the long term.

Five-year outcomes with first-line (1L) nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemotherapy (N + I + C) vs C in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) in CheckMate 9LA. Reck M, Ciuleanu TE, Schenker M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 16):8560-8560. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.8560.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: Switching to VERZENIO® Post-CDK4/6 inhibitor Progression May Improve Outcomes in HR-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the US, approximately 310,720 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2024, and about 42,250 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. These patients are often treated with single agent endocrine therapy, endocrine therapy in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitor, or single agent chemotherapy.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. Cyclin Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity and phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation and associated with increased expression of CDK4. The understanding of the role of Cyclin Dependent Kinases in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.

Abemaciclib (VERZENIO®) is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase activity that prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein, thereby inducing G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell proliferation. Abemaciclib is structurally distinct from other CDK 4 and 6 inhibitors (such as Ribociclib and Palbociclib) and is 14 times more potent against cyclin D1/CDK 4 and cyclin D3/CDK 6, in enzymatic assays, but potentially less toxic than earlier pan-CDK inhibitors. At higher doses, only Abemaciclib causes significant cancer cell death, compared with other CDK4/6 inhibitors, suggesting that this drug may be affecting proteins, other than CDK4/6. Additionally, preclinical studies have demonstrated that Abemaciclib may have additional therapeutic benefits for a subset of tumors that are unresponsive to treatment or have grown resistant to other CDK4/6 inhibitors.

For the patient group with advanced or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, Abemaciclib has FDA approval in combination with an Aromatase Inhibitor as initial endocrine-based therapy, in combination with Fulvestrant, with disease progression following endocrine therapy, and as monotherapy with disease progression following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Abemaciclib has activity in the Central Nervous System, and is included in the ASCO guidelines among the active agents in ER-positive/HER2-amplified breast cancer with brain metastasis. Abemaciclib has been shown to be an effective therapy after treatment with Palbociclib, another CDK4/6 inhibitor.

postMONARCH is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Abemaciclib in combination with Fulvestrant compared to a placebo plus Fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who experienced disease progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy. In this study, 368 patients (N=368) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant (N=182) or placebo plus Fulvestrant (N=186). The eligibility criteria included disease progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus Aromatase Inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease, or relapse on or after CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. No prior treatment for advanced disease aside from the initial regimen was allowed. The majority (99%) had progressed on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy as initial therapy for advanced disease. Prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatments included Palbociclib (59%), Ribociclib (33%), and Abemaciclib (8%). Approximately 99% of patients had progressed on CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy as initial treatement for advanced breast cancer. The two treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 59 years and stratification factors included duration of prior CDK4/6 inhibition, visceral metastases, and geographic region. Approximately 60% of patients had visceral metastasis and Imaging studies were performed every 8 weeks for the first 12 months and then every 12 weeks. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints encompassed PFS assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), and Safety. The study analysis was event-driven, with the primary outcome targeting 258 events, and with an interim analysis planned at 70% of events.

At the interim analysis, with 70% of the planned events, Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in investigator-assessed PFS compared to placebo plus Fulvestrant (HR=0.66; P=0.01). Upon completion of the primary analysis with 258 events, the HR for PFS was 0.73 reflecting a 27% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. The 6-month PFS rates were 50% for the Abemaciclib group versus 37% for the placebo group. The benefit of Abemaciclib was more pronounced with BICR-assessed PFS, showing a HR of 0.55 representing a 45% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. In patients with measurable disease, the ORR was 17% for the Abemaciclib group compared to 7% for the placebo group (P=0.0145 by investigator assessment and P=0.0008 by BICR). OS data remained immature with a 20.9% event rate at the time of analysis.

Subgroup Analyses suggested that patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use for more than 12 months had a median PFS of 7.0 months versus 5.4 months in the placebo group (HR=0.70; 95% CI = 0.52–0.94). For those with treatment durations up to 12 months, the median PFS was 5.5 months versus 3.0 months (HR=0.80; 95% CI = 0.50–1.29). The benefit was greater in patients without visceral metastases (HR=0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.83), though there was still a benefit observed in those with visceral metastases (HR=0.87; 95% CI = 0.64–1.17). Benefit was observed regardless of presence of ESR1 mutations or PI3K pathway alterations.

The safety profile of Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant was consistent with known profiles. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 25% of patients receiving the combination therapy. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 6% of patients on the Abemaciclib arm, compared with none in the placebo group. The most common Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia.

In summary, the postMONARCH trial supports the use of Abemaciclib plus Fulvestrant as an effective treatment for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy, offering a viable option and underscoring the value of continued CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression in the evolving landscape of breast cancer treatment.

This combination offers significant improvement in PFS, especially in patients with longer durations of prior CDK4/6 inhibition and those without visceral metastases and may be a preferred strategy in the second-line setting for patients who have progressed on initial CDK4/6-based therapies, particularly when biomarker-specific therapies are not available.

Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer following progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy: Primary outcome of the phase 3 postMONARCH trial. Kalinsky K, Bianchini G, Hamilton EP, et al. J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 17; abstr LBA1001). DOI 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA1001

Fixed-Duration CALQUENCE® plus Venetoclax Significantly Improved PFS in Previously Untreated CLL

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 20,700 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4440 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and CLL is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children. Patients with CLL often receive continuous therapy with either Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor, time limited therapy with BCL2 inhibitor Venetoclax given along with anti-CD20 antibody Obinutuzumab, or under certain circumstances, chemoimmunotherapy.

Brutons Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor, and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. BTK inhibitors inhibit cell proliferation and promote programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling. BTK is a validated molecular target found across numerous B-cell leukemias and lymphomas including CLL, Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), and Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). Four BTK inhibitors are presently approved by the FDA. They include first generation Ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA®) and second generation agents such as Acalabrutinib (CALQUENCE®), Zanubrutinib (BRUKINSA®) and Pirtobrutinib (JAYPIRCA®).

The pro-survival (anti-apoptotic) protein BCL2 is over expressed by CLL cells and regulates clonal selection and cell survival. Venetoclax (VENCLEXTA®) is a second generation, oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of BCL2 and restores the apoptotic processes in tumor cells. The combination of Ibrutinib as well as Acalabrutinib plus Venetoclax, were noted to be synergistic.

The AMPLIFY trial is a randomized, global, multi-center, open-label Phase III study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Acalabrutinib in combination with Venetoclax, with or without Obinutuzumab, compared to investigators choice of standard chemoimmunotherapy. In this study, 984 patients (N=984) across 171 locations worldwide with previously untreated CLL were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a fixed-duration regimen of Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax with Obinutuzumab, Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax without Obinutuzumab, or Standard-of-Care chemoimmunotherapy with either Fludarabine plus Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine plus Rituximab (BR). Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, and active disease requiring treatment as per the International Workshop on CLL 2018 criteria. Patients with prior CLL-specific treatments, 17p deletions, TP53 mutations, transformation of CLL to aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Central Nervous System involvement, or a history of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy were excluded. The Primary endpoint of the trial was Progression Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Key Secondary endpoints included PFS assessed by investigators, Overall Survival (OS), Event-Free Survival (EFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, and Time to next treatment.

High-level results from an interim analysis of the AMPLIFY Phase III trial showed that the combination of Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax, with or without Obinutuzumab resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared to standard chemoimmunotherapy, suggesting that patients receiving this combination therapy experienced longer periods without disease progression. The data will be presented at a forthcoming medical meeting and shared with regulatory authorities. Although OS data were not fully mature at the time of the interim analysis, there was a positive trend in favor of the Acalabrutinib-based regimens. The trial will continue to collect and analyze OS data as a key Secondary endpoint.

The safety profile of Acalabrutinib combined with Venetoclax, with or without Obinutuzumab, was consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents. No new safety concerns were identified, and the rates of cardiac toxicity were low, indicating that the treatment is well-tolerated.

In summary, the AMPLIFY trial highlights the potential benefits of fixed-duration treatment regimens. Such regimens allow patients to take breaks from ongoing therapy, reducing the risk of long-term side effects and drug resistance, and potentially improving their quality of life and providing more flexibility for patients. This contrasts with continuous therapies that may carry higher risks of cumulative toxicity and resistance.

Overall, the AMPLIFY trial represents a significant advancement in the treatment of CLL, demonstrating that combining Acalabrutinib with Venetoclax, with or without Obinutuzumab, offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative to standard chemoimmunotherapy, potentially improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2024/calquence-fixed-duration-combo-improved-1l-cll-pfs.html.