Category: Hem/Onc Updates

Capivasertib Plus Fulvestrant Improves Progression Free Survival in Advanced Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S.

About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. The most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer is HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (65% of all metastatic breast tumors), and these patients are often treated with anti-estrogen therapy as first line treatment. However, resistance to hormonal therapy occurs in a majority of the patients, with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 36 months. With the development of Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay, for the management of HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, as first line therapy. Even with this therapeutic combination, most patients will eventually experience disease progression due to resistance to endocrine therapy. Therapies overcoming this resistance is an area of active research in the breast cancer space.

Capivasertib is a novel pyrrolopyrimidine derivative, and is first-in-class orally available inhibitor of the serine/threonine protein kinase AKT (protein kinase B), with potential antineoplastic activity. It is a potent, selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of all three AKT isoforms (AKT1/2/3). Inhibition of AKT prevents the phosphorylation of AKT substrates that mediate cellular processes, such as cell division, apoptosis, and glucose and fatty acid metabolism. A wide range of solid and hematological malignancies show dysregulated PI3K/AKT/mTOR/PTEN signaling due to mutations in the genes involved. By targeting AKT, the key node in the PIK3/AKT signaling network, Capivasertib potentially may be used as monotherapy or combination therapy for a variety of human cancers. The researchers conducted the CAPItello-291 trial to determine whether the addition of Capivasertib to Fulvestrant would improve outcomes in patients with HR-positive breast cancer whose tumors had developed resistance to an Aromatase Inhibitor.

CAPItello-291 is a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial in which 708 adult patients with histologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-low or negative breast cancer, whose disease has recurred or progressed during or after Aromatase Inhibitor therapy, with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant (N=355) arm or the placebo plus Fulvestrant arm (N=353). Patients in the study group received Capivasertib 400 mg orally twice daily for 4 days on and 3 days off along with Fulvestrant 500 mg IM on days 1 and 15 during cycle 1, then every 4 weeks thereafter. The present dosing of Capivasertib was chosen based on tolerability and the degree of target inhibition in early phase trials. The control group received matched placebo along with Fulvestrant. In this trial, patients could have received up to one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease and approximately 40% of tumors had PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations. Both treatment groups were well balanced. Stratification factors included liver metastases and prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor. The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the overall patient population and in a subgroup of patients whose tumors have qualifying alterations in the PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN genes. Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR).

The trial met both Primary endpoints, improving PFS in the overall patient population and in a prespecified biomarker subgroup of patients whose tumors had qualifying alterations in the AKT pathway genes. In the overall trial population, patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant had a median PFS of 7.2 months, compared to 3.6 months in patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant (HR=0.60; P<0.001). This amounted to a 40% lower risk of disease progression among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant.

Among patients with AKT pathway mutations treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant, the median PFS was 7.3 months versus 3.1 months in the placebo group (HR=0.50; P<0.001), reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 50%, versus placebo plus Fulvestrant. In the group without qualifying alterations in the AKT pathway genes, the PFS was 7.2 months in the Capivasertib group versus 3.7 months in the placebo group (HR=0.70). The benefit from Capivasertib was consistent across key clinically relevant subgroups, including patients previously treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and patients with liver metastases.

The Objective Response Rate in the overall trial population was 22.9% among patients treated with Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant compared with 12.2% for patients treated with placebo plus Fulvestrant and was 28.8% and 9.7% respectively in the biomarker altered population. Although the Overall Survival data were immature at the time of the analysis, early data are encouraging and follow up is ongoing.

The most frequent Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurring in 5% or more of patients were diarrhea (9.3%) and rash (12.1%). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 13% among patients who received Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant versus 2.3% among patients who received placebo plus Fulvestrant.

It was concluded that a combination of Capivasertib plus Fulvestrant is a new treatment option with significantly improved Progression Free Survival, in patients who have Hormone Receptor–positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who had progressed on, or become resistant to, endocrine therapies and CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the Phase III CAPItello-291 trial. Turner N, Oliveria M, Howell SJ, et al. Presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS3-04.

BRUKINSA® Superior to IMBRUVICA® in Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 20,160 new cases of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) will be diagnosed in the US and 4410 patients will die of the disease. CLL accounts for about one-quarter of the new cases of leukemia. The average age of patients diagnosed with CLL is around 70 years, and is rarely seen in people under age 40, and is extremely rare in children.

Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) is a member of the Tec family of kinases, downstream of the B-cell receptor and is predominantly expressed in B-cells. It is a mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. Ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA®) is an oral, irreversible inhibitor of BTK and inhibits cell proliferation and promotes programmed cell death (Apoptosis) by blocking B-cell activation and signaling. IMBRUVICA® demonstrated survival benefits, when compared to chemoimmunotherapy, both in previously untreated (RESONATE-2), as well as relapsed (RESONATE) CLL patients. However, toxicities leading to IMBRUVICA® discontinuation occurred in a significant number of patients, and Atrial Fibrillation was noted in 11-16% of patients and hypertension rates were between 20-26%.

Zanubrutinib (BRUKINSA®) is an irreversible, potent, next-generation, small molecule inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase, designed to deliver targeted and sustained inhibition of the BTK protein by optimizing bioavailability, half-life, and selectivity, while minimizing off-target inhibition of TEC- and EGFR-family kinases. It has been hypothesized that the increased selectivity of BRUKINSA® may minimize toxicities, (such as those often associated with IMBRUVICA®) and improve efficacy outcomes. BRUKINSA® demonstrated promising efficacy among patients with CLL/SLL (Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma), in early phase trials.

ALPINE study is a randomized, global, Phase III trial in which BRUKINSA® was compared with IMBRUVICA® in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL. In this trial, a total of 652 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either BRUKINSA® 160 mg orally twice daily or IMBRUVICA® 420 mg orally once daily, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Enrolled patients had at least one prior systemic therapy and were required to have measurable lymphadenopathy by CT scan or MRI. Exclusion criteria included current or past Richter’s transformation and prior treatment with BTK inhibitors. The median age was 67 years, 45% of the patients had bulky disease with a tumor that was 5 cm or more in the greatest dimension, 73% had unmutated IGHV status, and 23% had a chromosome 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, or both and fewer than 15% of patients were on anticoagulants. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 1 and a total of 80% of the patients in the BRUKINSA® group and 76% of those in the IMBRUVICA® group had previously received chemoimmunotherapy. The Primary end point of the trial was Overall Response Rate (ORR) assessed by investigator and Independent Review Committee (IRC), and Secondary end points included Progression Free Survival (PFS), event rate of Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter, Duration of Response, Time to Treatment Failure, Overall Survival (OS), Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Safety.

A prespecified interim analysis showed that BRUKINSA® was superior to IMBRUVICA®, with respect to Overall Response Rate. The authors in this final analysis reported the clinical outcomes of Progression Free Survival, a key Secondary endpoint. Progression Free Survival was assessed with the use of a hierarchical testing strategy to determine whether BRUKINSA® was noninferior to IMBRUVICA®. If noninferiority was established, the superiority of BRUKINSA® was assessed and claimed if the two-sided P value was less than 0.05.

At a median follow up of 29.6 months, BRUKINSA® was found to be superior to IMBRUVICA® with respect to Progression Free Survival, as assessed by the investigators and Independent Review Committee (HR=0.65; P=0.002). The PFS at 24 months was 78.4% in the BRUKINSA® group and 65.9% in the IMBRUVICA® group. Median PFS was not reached in the BRUKINSA® group and was 34.2 months in the IMBRUVICA® group.

Among patients with a 17p deletion, a TP53 mutation, or both, those who received BRUKINSA® had longer PFS than those who received IMBRUVICA® (HR=0.53). The percentage of patients who were alive without disease progression at 24 months in this high-risk population was 72.6% in the BRUKINSA® group, and 54.6% in the IMBRUVICA® group. The PFS benefit was in favor of BRUKINSA® across major prespecified subgroups, including age, previous lines of therapy, disease stage, and IGHV mutational status.

Consistent with the findings at the interim analysis, the Overall Response Rate was higher in the BRUKINSA® group than in the IMBRUVICA® group, and were 86.2% and 75.7%, respectively, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee.

BRUKINSA® had a more favorable safety profile, with a lower incidence of cardiac disorders (21.3%), than in the IMBRUVICA® group (29.6%). Cardiac events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 0.3% of patients in the BRUKINSA® group and in 4.3% of patients in the IMBRUVICA® group. The incidence of Atrial fibrillation or flutter of any grade, a key Secondary endpoint, was lower in the BRUKINSA® group than in the IMBRUVICA® group (5.2% versus 13.3%).

It was concluded that in patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, treatment with BRUKINSA® resulted in a significantly longer Progression Free Survival, compared to those patients who received IMBRUVICA®, and BRUKINSA® was associated with fewer cardiac adverse events.

Zanubrutinib or Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Brown JR, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:319-332.

NALIRIFOX Improves Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2022, about 62,210 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 49,830 people will die of the disease. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and Western Europe. Unfortunately, unlike other malignancies, very little progress has been made and outcome for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been dismal, with a 5-year survival rate for metastatic pancreatic cancer of approximately 10%. Pancreatic cancer has surpassed breast cancer as the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is on track to surpass colorectal cancer, to move to the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States. Majority of patients with pancreatic cancer (80% of cases) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and are not amenable to curative surgical resection, at the time of diagnosis. The current treatment regimens for advanced disease have proved ineffective, conferring a median Overall Survival (OS) of 6-8 months.

ONIVYDE® is a novel nanoliposomal encapsulation of Irinotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor. It is designed to optimize the delivery of Irinotecan, by extending the duration of circulation of the drug in the body and preferentially activating the drug within the tumor tissues, to achieve higher levels of the active cytotoxic drug metabolite, SN-38. This approach reduces the toxicity of Irinotecan to normal tissues while maintaining or increasing its anti-tumor efficacy.

In the NAPOLI-1 open-label Phase III study, a combination of ONIVYDE®, 5-FU and Leucovorin improved Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, CA19-9 response and Disease Control Rate following Gemcitabine-based therapy, in patients with metastatic Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. ONIVYDE® in combination with Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin was approved for this indication in 2015. In a Phase I/II study, ONIVYDE® in combination with 5-FU, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

NAPOLI 3 is a global, randomized, open-label Phase III trial which tested the safety and efficacy of NALIRIFOX regimen in treatment naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In this study, 770 patients with histopathologically/cytologically confirmed untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive NALIRIFOX (N=383) or Gemcitabine plus nab-Paclitaxel (N=387). The NALIRIFOX regimen consisted of ONIVYDE® 50 mg/m2 IV, given along with 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 IV, Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV and Oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients in the Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel group received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV along with nab-Paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 IV, on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Both treatment groups were well balanced with similar baseline characteristics, including median age of 64.5 years and number of metastatic sites (three or greater in 37% of patients). Patients were stratified by ECOG performance status, geographic region, and presence or absence of liver metastases. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS) and Secondary endpoints included were Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Safety.

At a median follow-up of 16.1 months, the median OS was 11.1 months in the NALIRIFOX group versus 9.2 months in the Gemcitabine plus nab-Paclitaxel arm (HR=0.84; P=0.04). There was also a significant improvement in the PFS at 7.4 months versus 5.6 months respectively (HR=0.70; P=0.0001). This OS and PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. The NALIRIFOX group also had a higher Objective Response Rate at 41.8% versus 36.2% for patients treated with Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel group, and a lower percentage of patients who received NALIRIFOX went on to receive subsequent anticancer therapy (50.5% versus 54.4%). Treatment related toxicities associated with NALIRIFOX regimen were manageable and consistent with the drug profiles in this regimen.

It was concluded that first line treatment with NALIRIFOX regimen demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival, compared with Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel, in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

NAPOLI-3: A randomized, open-label phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) versus nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Wainberg ZA, Melisi D, Macarulla T, et al. Presented at: ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; Jan. 19-21, 2023; San Francisco. Abstract LBA661.

Biomarkers May Predict Response to Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2023, approximately 82,290 new cases of Bladder Cancer will be diagnosed and 16,710 patients will die of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but it is less common in women. A third of the patients initially present with locally invasive or metastatic disease. Patients with urothelial carcinoma are currently treated in the first line setting with a Platinum based chemotherapy regimen and a checkpoint Inhibitor (PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor) in the second line setting. Treatment options for patients who progress after first and second line therapies are limited, with poor outcomes. The response rates with standard chemotherapy in this patient population, is about 10%. Approximately 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma are ineligible for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There is therefore a critical need for effective and tolerable first line treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (PADCEV®) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets Nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule highly expressed in urothelial cancers and other solid tumors. Nectin-4 has been implicated in tumor cell growth and proliferation. Following binding to Nectin-4 on the cell surface, Enfortumab vedotin becomes internalized and is processed by lysosomes, with the liberation of its cytotoxic payload, Monomethyl auristatin E, which in turn disrupts microtubule assembly, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Enfortumab vedotin resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, and a higher Overall Response Rate, than standard chemotherapy, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who had previously received Platinum-based treatment and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. However there are limited data available on biomarkers predictive of outcomes when treated with Enfortumab vedotin.

The researchers in this study investigated potential biomarkers of response to Enfortumab vedotin by analyzing data from the UNITE (Urothelial Cancer Network to Investigate Therapeutic Experiences) database. This analysis include 170 patients from 16 different sites, with available Next Generation Sequencing using institutional or commercial platforms, treated with Enfortumab vedotin alone, outside of a clinical trial setting, for whom outcomes were available. The median age was 70 years, 78% were men, 65% had pure urothelial histology, 69% had primary bladder tumor, and 68% had 2 or more lines of therapy before Enfortumab vedotin.

The following molecular biomarkers were assessed: Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), PD-L1 status, presence of 1 or more DNA damage response mutations such as BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, CDK12, BARD1, PPP2R2A, or RAD51B, and somatic alterations such as TERTp, TP53, ARID1A, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, FGFR3, ERBB2, CCND1, KDM6A, MTAP, PIK3CA, RB1, TSC1, in 10% or more of patients. Investigators determined observed response to Enfortumab vedotin in patients with scans after one or more doses of the therapy.

For all patients included in this analysis, the Observed Response Rate was 47%, median Progression Free Survival was 6 months and median Overall Survival was 12 months. The Observed Response Rates were higher in patients with ERBB2 and TSC1 alterations versus wild-type (67% versus 44%; P=0.05 and 68% versus 25%; P=0.04, respectively). Shorter median Progression Free Survival was noted in patients with CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP alterations, whereas patients with high Tumor Mutation Burden (10 or more Mut/Mb) had longer median Overall Survival.

It was concluded that analysis of this large, multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, identified several potential biomarkers associated with differential outcomes to Enfortumab vedotin, and these findings may help inform clinical decision making and potential therapy sequencing.

Biomarkers of response to enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): Analysis of the UNITE study. Jindal T, Kilari D, Alhalabi O, et al.DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.450 Journal of Clinical Oncology.

FDA Expands Adjuvant VERZENIO® Indication in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on March 3, 2023, approved VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib) with endocrine therapy (Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor) for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Patients defined as high risk included those having either four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 three positive axillary lymph nodes and either tumor grade 3 or a tumor size 5 cm or more. VERZENIO® was previously approved for the above high-risk population with the additional requirement of having a Ki-67 score of 20% or more. The present approval removed the Ki-67 testing requirement.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, in the U.S.

About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. About 90% of all breast cancers are detected at an early stage, and these patients are often cured with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However approximately 20% of patients will experience local recurrence or distant relapse during the first 10 years of treatment. This may be more relevant for those with high risk disease, among whom the risk of recurrence is even greater during the first 2 years while on adjuvant endocrine therapy, due to primary endocrine resistance. More than 75% of the early recurrences are seen at distant sites. Factors associated with high risk of recurrence in HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer include positive nodal status, the number of positive nodes, large tumor size (5 cm or more), and high tumor grade (Grade 3).

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDKs) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. CDK 4 and 6 phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity. Phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in HR-positive breast cancer, by binding to D-cyclins in the ER-positive breast cancer cell, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation. The understanding of the role of CDKs in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.

VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib) is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase activity, and prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein, thereby inducing G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell proliferation. VERZENIO® is structurally distinct from other CDK 4 and 6 inhibitors (such as Ribociclib and Palbociclib) and is 14 times more potent against Cyclin D1/CDK 4 and Cyclin D3/CDK 6, in enzymatic assays, but potentially less toxic than earlier pan-CDK inhibitors. At higher doses, only VERZENIO® causes significant cancer cell death, compared with other CDK4/6 inhibitors, suggesting that this drug may be affecting proteins, other than CDK4/6. Additionally, preclinical studies have demonstrated that VERZENIO® may have additional therapeutic benefits for a subset of tumors that are unresponsive to treatment or have grown resistant to other CDK4/6 inhibitors. It has also been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier.

The monarchE trial is an international, open-label, two-cohort, randomized, Phase III study, conducted to evaluate the additional benefit of adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting, for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, high risk, early breast cancer. This study included 5637 patients, who were pre- and postmenopausal, with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer, and with clinical and/or pathologic risk factors that rendered them at high risk for relapse. The researchers defined high risk as the presence of four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 three positive axillary lymph nodes, with either a tumor size of 5 cm or more, histologic Grade 3, or centrally tested high proliferation rate (Ki-67 of 20% or more). To be enrolled in Cohort 1 (N=5,120), which is the FDA-approved population, patients had to have 4 or more positive nodes or 1-3 positive nodes and either tumor grade 3 or a tumor size 5 cm or more. To be enrolled in Cohort 2 (N=517), patients could not be eligible for Cohort 1 and must have had 1-3 positive nodes and tumor Ki-67 score of 20% or more. Following completion of primary therapy which included both adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to VERZENIO® 150 mg orally twice daily for 2 years plus 5-10 years of physicians choice of endocrine therapy as clinically indicated (N=2808), or endocrine therapy alone (N=2829). The median patient age was 51 years, about 43% of the patients were premenopausal, and 95% of patients had prior chemotherapy. Approximately 60% of patients had 4 or more positive lymph nodes. The Primary endpoint was Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS), and Secondary end points included Distant Relapse Free Survival (DRFS), Overall Survival (OS), and Safety.

The FDA label expansion is supported by four-year data from the monarchE trial. There was significantly more Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) benefit beyond the two-year treatment course with adjuvant VERZENIO® and the absolute difference in IDFS between the two treatment groups increased over time. The IDFS at 48 months was 85.5% for VERZENIO® plus standard endocrine therapy and 78.6% for standard endocrine therapy alone, with an absolute difference in IDFS of 6.9%. At two years and at three years, the absolute differences between treatment groups were 3.1% and 5.0%, respectively. The addition of VERZENIO® to standard endocrine therapy reduced the risk of recurrence by 35% compared to endocrine therapy alone (HR=0.653). This benefit was primarily among patients in Cohort 1 and there were no new safety findings. However, in Cohort 2, more deaths were observed with VERZENIO® plus standard endocrine therapy compared to standard endocrine therapy alone and the FDA label therefore is restricted to Cohort 1. The Overall Survival (OS) data was immature across the entire study, but there was an OS trend in favor of VERZENIO® in the Cohort 1 population.

It was concluded that the use of adjuvant VERZENIO® in patients with high-risk Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer reduced the risk of recurrent disease, and this benefit was sustained beyond the completion of treatment, with an absolute increase noted at 4 years. Overall Survival data was immature at the time of this analysis.

Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Johnston SRD, Toi M, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:77-90.

Five Year Outcomes with KEYTRUDA® Plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Nonsquamous Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 238,340 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 127,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

KEYTRUDA® is a fully humanized, immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the tumor-specific effector T cells. High level of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is defined as membranous PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of the tumor cells, regardless of the staining intensity. It is estimated that based on observations from previous studies, approximately 25% of the patients with advanced NSCLC have a high level of PD-L1 expression and high level of PD-L1 expression has been associated with significantly increased response rates to KEYTRUDA®.

KEYNOTE-189 is a double-blind, Phase III trial in which 616 patients with untreated Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC, without sensitizing EGFR or ALK mutations, were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with four cycles of KEYTRUDA®/Pemetrexed/Carboplatin (N=410) or placebo plus the same chemotherapy (N=206). Patients then received either KEYTRUDA® 200 mg or saline placebo, both administered IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. All the patients received four cycles of the investigator’s choice of Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV or Carboplatin AUC 5 along with Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, all administered IV every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Patients in the placebo combination group were allowed to crossover to KEYTRUDA® monotherapy upon disease progression. Patients with symptomatic brain metastasis were excluded and patients were stratified according to PD-L1 expression (Tumor Proportion Score, 1% or more versus less than 1%), choice of platinum-based drug (Cisplatin versus Carboplatin), and smoking history. Both treatment groups were well balanced and about 17% had brain metastasis and one-third were untreated. A PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score of 1% or more was reported in 63% of the patients, Carboplatin was the preferred platinum-based drug in 72% of the patients, and 88% of the patients were current or former smokers. The co-Primary end points were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary end points included Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR) and Safety. Exploratory end points included PFS2 (time from random assignment to second/subsequent progressive disease on next-line treatment or death from any cause).

In the initial report from the trial, after a median follow-up of 10.5 months, the median PFS was 8.8 months in the KEYTRUDA® combination group and 4.9 months in the placebo combination group (HR=0.52; P<0.001) and the median OS was Not Reached with KEYTRUDA® combination and was 11.3 months in the placebo combination group (HR=0.49; P<0.001).

In this updated analysis, the researchers presented 5-year outcomes from the Phase III KEYNOTE-189 study. The median time from randomization to data cutoff (in March 2022) was 64.6 months. There was continued benefit in the Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival in the KEYTRUDA® group compared to the control group (HR=0.50 versus HR=0.60, respectively). The 5-year Progression Free Survival rates were 7.5% versus 0.6% and 5-year Overall Survival rates were 19.4% versus 11.3% respectively. The Objective Response Rate in the KEYTRUDA® group was 48.3% versus 19.9% in the control group, and the median Duration of Response was 12.7 and 7.1 months, respectively. Similar trends were observed across the PD-L1 subgroups analyzed. Among the 57 patients assigned to KEYTRUDA® combination and completed 35 cycles of KEYTRUDA®, the Objective Response Rate was 86% and the estimated Overall Survival rate 3 years after completion of 35 cycles (approximately 5 years from random assignment) was 71.9%. Sustained improvements in Overall Survival were observed in the KEYTRUDA® combination group, despite a crossover rate of 57% of patients from placebo plus chemotherapy to subsequent anti-PD1 therapy, further supporting the use of KEYTRUDA® plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment.

It was concluded that KEYTRUDA® in combination with Pemetrexed and Platinum chemotherapy continued to demonstrate prolonged survival and durable antitumor activity, compared to chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 expression. The authors added that these data continue to support the combination of first-line KEYTRUDA® plus a Platinum and Pemetrexed as a standard of care, in patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, without EGFR/ALK alterations.

Pembrolizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum in Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 Study. Garassino MC, Gadgeel S, Speranza G, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01989 Journal of Clinical Oncology. Published online February 21, 2023.

Overall Survival Benefit with Pembrolizumab in Advanced Gastric Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the US about 26,500 new gastric cancer cases will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 11,130 people will die of the disease. It is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world. Several hereditary syndromes such as Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC), Lynch syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer) and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) have been associated with a predisposition for Gastric cancer. Additionally, one of the strongest risk factor for Gastric adenocarcinoma is infection with Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), which is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped microaerophilic bacterium.

Patients with localized disease (Stage II and Stage III) are often treated with multimodality therapy and 40% of the patients may survive for 5 years or more. However, majority of the patients with Gastric and GastroEsophageal junction Adenocarcinoma have advanced disease at the time of initial presentation and have limited therapeutic options with little or no chance for cure. These patients frequently are treated with Platinum containing chemotherapy along with a Fluoropyrimidine and, if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy. This can however be associated with significant toxicities impacting patient’s quality of life. The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy has been demonstrated in Gastric and GastroEsophageal cancer.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. It thereby reverses the PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells.

KEYNOTE-859 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the benefit of adding Pembrolizumab to Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal cancer. In this study, 1,579 patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal adenocarcinoma, with known a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS), were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV (N=790) or placebo (N=789), every 3 weeks for 35 cycles or less, given along with investigator’s choice of 5-FU plus Cisplatin or Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin (CAPOX). Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups and randomization was stratified by region, PD-L1 CPS (less than 1 versus 1 or more), and choice of chemotherapy. At baseline, 78% of patients had PD-L1 CPS 1 or more, while 35% had tumors with CPS 10 or more.

The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS) by blinded Independent Central Review. Secondary end points included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR) and Safety. The researchers provided the data from the interim analysis, at a median follow up of 31.0 months.

The median Overall Survival was 12.9 months with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus 11.5 months with chemotherapy alone (HR=0.78, P<0.0001). The median PFS was 6.9 months versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR=0.76, P<0.0001). The benefit with Pembrolizumab was consistent across subgroups, including those by PD-L1 CPS. The risk reduction was especially notable among patients with MicroSatellite Instability (MSI)-High status, who had a 66% relative reduction in the risk of death, and patients with PD-L1 CPS 10 or more, whose risk was reduced by 36%. The Objective Response Rate was 51.3% in the Pembrolizumab group and 42.0% in the control group (P=0.00009), and the median Duration of Response was 8.0 months versus 5.7 months, respectively. Immune-related toxicities, especially hypothyroidism, were more common with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and no new safety signals were seen.

It was concluded that treatment with Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival and Objective Response Rate, among patients with locally advanced or metastatic, HER2-negative Gastric or GastroEsophageal adenocarcinoma of any PD-L1 expression level, thus providing a new treatment option for this patient group.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: Phase III KEYNOTE-859 study. Rha SY, Wyrwicz LS, Weber PEY, et al. ESMO Virtual Plenary Session Date: 16-17 February 2023. VP1-2023. Published: February 16, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.01.006.

Rucaparib or Physicians Choice of Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 288,300 new cases of Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and 34,700 men will die of the disease.

The development and progression of Prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced Prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention. Androgen Deprivation Therapies have included bilateral orchiectomy or Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues, with or without first generation Androgen Receptor (AR) inhibitors such as CASODEX® (Bicalutamide), NILANDRON® (Nilutamide) and EULEXIN® (Flutamide) or with second-generation Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI), which include, ZYTIGA® (Abiraterone), XTANDI® (Enzalutamide) and ERLEADA® (Apalutamide). Approximately 10-20% of patients with advanced Prostate cancer will progress to Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) within five years during ADT, and over 80% of these patients will have metastatic disease at the time of CRPC diagnosis. The estimated mean survival of patients with CRPC is 9-36 months, and there is therefore an unmet need for new effective therapies.

DNA damage is a common occurrence in daily life by UV light, ionizing radiation, replication errors, chemical agents, etc. This can result in single and double strand breaks in the DNA structure which must be repaired for cell survival. The two vital pathways for DNA repair in a normal cell are BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes recognize and repair double strand DNA breaks via Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Homologous Recombination is a type of genetic recombination and is a DNA repair pathway utilized by cells to accurately repair DNA double-stranded breaks during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and thereby maintain genomic integrity. Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) is noted following mutation of genes involved in HR repair pathway. At least 15 genes are involved in the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway including BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM genes. The BRCA1 gene is located on the long (q) arm of chromosome 17 whereas BRCA2 is located on the long arm of chromosome 13. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes and functional BRCA proteins repair damaged DNA, and play an important role in maintaining cellular genetic integrity. They regulate cell growth and prevent abnormal cell division and development of malignancy. Recently published data has shown that deleterious Germline and/or Somatic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, or other Homologous Recombination DNA-repair genes, are present in about 25% of patients with advanced prostate cancer, including metastatic CRPC. Approximately 12% of men with metastatic CRPC harbor a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (BRCA1, 2%; BRCA2, 10%). Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 also account for about 20-25% of hereditary breast cancers, about 5-10% of all breast cancers, and 15% of ovarian cancers.

The PARP (Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase), family of enzymes include, PARP1and PARP2, and is a related enzymatic pathway that repairs single strand breaks in DNA. In a BRCA mutant, the cancer cell relies solely on PARP pathway for DNA repair to survive. PARP inhibitors trap PARP onto DNA at sites of single-strand breaks, preventing their repair and generating double-strand breaks that cannot be repaired accurately in tumors harboring defects in Homologous Recombination Repair pathway genes, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, and this leads to cumulative DNA damage and tumor cell death.

RUBRACA® (Rucaparib) is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of PARP inhibitor, and in the Phase II TRITON2 study, Rucaparib showed a high level of activity in metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) associated with a deleterious BRCA alteration, in patients who had received previous treatment with a second-generation Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) and taxane-based chemotherapy.

TRITON3 is an open-label, controlled, randomized, Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the benefit of Rucaparib in men with metastatic CRPC at an earlier stage of treatment, and to confirm and expand on data from the TRITON2 study. This study enrolled patients who had metastatic CRPC with a BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration, who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation ARPI, and who had not received previous chemotherapy for metastatic CRPC. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive Rucaparib 600 mg orally twice daily or a physician’s choice of therapy (Docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI such as Abiraterone acetate or Enzalutamide). Abiraterone acetate or Enzalutamide could not be selected if the patient had received either drug before trial initiation. Approximately 56% received Docetaxel in the control group. The median age was 70 years and baseline genomic, demographic, and disease characteristics were well balanced in the two groups although men of African descent were underrepresented relative to the general population. Among the patients who had undergone randomization, 302 patients had a BRCA alteration and 103 patients had an ATM alteration. In this study, there were smaller numbers of patients with BRCA1 alterations than with BRCA2 alterations. The Primary end point was the median duration of imaging-based Progression Free Survival (PFS) according to Independent Review. Secondary outcomes included Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, Time to progression according to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

At 62 months, the median duration of imaging-based PFS was significantly longer in the Rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; HR=0.50) and in the intention-to-treat group (10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; HR=0.61; P<0.001 for both comparisons). These findings demonstrating the benefit of Rucaparib compared to the Docetaxel control group are significant, as numerous previous studies either did not include Docetaxel in the control group, or did not show the superiority of PARP inhibition to Docetaxel. These study findings were consistent with the results of previous studies, suggesting that repeated use of second-generation ARPIs appeared to have only modest activity and inferior to PARP inhibition. Among patients with measurable disease at baseline, the confirmed Objective Response in the Rucaparib group and the control group was 45% and 17% respectively in the BRCA subgroup, 35% and 16% respectively, in the intention-to-treat population and no response and 14% respectively in the ATM subgroup. Because there were a smaller number of patients with BRCA1 alterations than with BRCA2 alterations in this study, the treatment benefit was not conclusive in those with BRCA1 alterations.

In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based PFS was 8.1 months in the Rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (HR=0.95), suggesting limited efficacy of Rucaparib in the ATM subgroup, similar to the results of previous clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors. The most frequent adverse events with Rucaparib were fatigue and nausea.

It was concluded that in patients with metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in whom treatment with an Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) had failed, the use of Rucaparib resulted in a longer duration of imaging-based Progression Free Survival than a physician’s choice of Docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI.

Rucaparib or Physician’s Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN, et al., for the TRITON3 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:719-732.

Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that approximately 300,590 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2023 and about 43,700 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. Majority of these patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and are often cured with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However approximately 20% of patients will experience local recurrence or distant relapse during the first 10 years of treatment.

The median age at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in the US is 62 years and approximately 26% of breast cancer diagnoses are in women 65 to 74 years of age. Patient undergoing breast conserving surgery, often receive adjuvant breast radiation therapy to reduce the risk of local recurrence. Radiation therapy however is inconvenient, expensive and is associated with acute and late toxicities. Avoidance of radiation in elderly patients with low risk disease has remained controversial due to the lack of long term Level 1 evidence. In the LUMINA trial and PRIME II study of women over 55 years of age with low risk breast cancer, after a median follow up of 5 years, 5-year rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was low at 2-4% among those women who did not receive adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. The researchers herein reported the 10-year outcomes of the PRIME II trial.

PRIME II is a Phase III randomized clinical trial of the omission of breast irradiation, designed by the Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group (SCTBG). This study included women 65 years of age or older, who had Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, node-negative, T1 or T2 primary breast cancer (with tumors 3 cm or less in the largest dimension), treated with breast-conserving surgery with clear excision margins and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients were eligible if they had either cancer with Grade 3 histologic features or lymphovascular invasion but not both. A total of 1326 women were randomly assigned to receive 40-50 Gy whole-breast irradiation (N=658) or no radiation therapy (N=668). Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 70 years and less than 10% of patients had ER-low tumors. The Primary end point was local breast cancer recurrence. Regional recurrence, breast cancer–specific survival, distant recurrence as the first event, and Overall Survival were also assessed. The median follow up was 9.1 years.

The cumulative incidence of local breast cancer recurrence after 10 years of follow up was 9.5% in the no-radiotherapy group and 0.9% in the radiotherapy group (HR=10.4; P<0.001). Even though local recurrence was more common in the group that did not receive radiotherapy, there was no substantial difference in the 10-year incidence of distant recurrence as the first event between the two treatment groups (1.6% without radiotherapy and 3.0% with radiotherapy). Overall Survival at 10 years was almost identical in the two groups, at 80.8% with no radiotherapy and 80.7% with radiotherapy. The incidence of regional recurrence and breast cancer–specific survival also did not differ substantially between the two groups.

The authors concluded that omission of radiotherapy was associated with an increased incidence of local recurrence but had no detrimental effect on distant recurrence as the first event, or Overall Survival, among women 65 years of age or older, with Grade 1 or 2, Estrogen Receptor-high breast cancers, treated with breast-conserving surgery and 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer. Kunkler IH, Williams LJ, Jack WJL, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:585-594.

Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2023, about 238,340 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 127,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Low Dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer resulted in a 20% reduction in mortality In the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). The USPSTF expanded the criteria for lung cancer screening in 2021 and recommended annual screening with Low-Dose CT for adults aged 50-80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. Approximately 15% of patients present with early stage (T1-2 N0) disease, and these numbers are likely to increase with the more rigorous implementation of lung cancer screening programs.

Surgical resection is the primary treatment for approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC who present with early Stage (I–IIIA) disease. Pneumonectomy is rarely performed due to unacceptably high mortality rate. Lobectomy has been the standard of surgical care for patients with clinical T1N0 NSCLC since the mid 1990s. This was based on the results of a randomized trial comparing Lobectomy with Sublobar resection in patients with clinical T1N0 NSCLC. In this trial, the frequency of local recurrence was three times higher with Sublobar resection compared with Lobectomy, and lung cancer-related mortality was 50% higher with Sublobar resection.Types-of-Lung-Resection

Sublobar resection includes Wedge resection and Segmentectomy. In Wedge resection, the lung tumor is removed with a surrounding margin of normal lung tissue, and is not an anatomical resection. Segmentectomy, unlike Wedge resection, is an anatomical resection that usually includes one or more pulmonary parenchymal segments with the dissection of intraparenchymal and hilar lymph nodes. Advances in imaging as well as staging by means of mediastinoscopy, and routine intraoperative lymphadenectomy has enabled the identification of small, peripheral NSCLCs for which Sublobar resection was potentially appropriate. Sublobar resection was considered a “compromise operation” in selected high risk patients with early stage lung cancer. With the approval of lung cancer screening in high risk individuals and subsequent detection of small tumors, Sublobar resections have been on the rise and may be the preferred surgical option, even in good-risk patients, in many institutions. Sublobar resection preserves pulmonary function and leaves open more treatment options for NSCLC patients, who remain at high risk for metachronous primary NSCLC, following curative intervention for their first NSCLC.

With the implementation of CT-based lung cancer screening recently, lung cancers are likely detected at a very early stage (T1a-bN0; 2 cm or less, node negative tumors). Further, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer and present as peripherally located tumors. Advances in preoperative staging such as endobronchial ultrasonography, have improved patient selection for treatment. Majority of surgical resections are now performed by means of video or robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. This has improved postoperative outcomes, with significant reduction in perioperative morbidity, mortality and median length of hospital stay after either Sublobar resection or Lobectomy.

The authors in this study reported the results of a randomized international trial comparing Sublobar resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) with Lobectomy, in patients with clinical Stage IA NSCLC, with a tumor size of 2 cm or less. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 was a multicenter, international, randomized, noninferiority, Phase III trial, involving patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0. In this study, a total of 697 patients, after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease, were randomly assigned to undergo either Sublobar resection (N=340) or Lobar resection (N=357). Of the 340 patients assigned to Sublobar resection, 201 (59.1%) underwent wedge resection and 129 (37.9%) underwent an anatomical segmental resection. Wedge resection was allowed in the current trial as it is the most frequently practiced method of Sublobar resection in North America and Europe and its inclusion would make the trial more representative of a “real world” setting. The median patient age was 68 years. Approximately 50% of patients had tumor size 1.0-1.5 cm, 40% had tumor size 1.5-2.0 cm, and two thirds of the patients had Adenocarcinoma histology. Over 90% of the patients were current or former smokers. The Primary end point was Disease-Free Survival (DFS), defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions.

After a median follow up of 7 years, Sublobar resection was noninferior to Lobar resection for DFS (HR for disease recurrence or death=1.01). The 5-year DFS was 63.6% after Sublobar resection and 64.1% after Lobar resection. The Overall Survival after Sublobar resection was similar to that after Lobar resection (HR for death, 0.95). The 5-year OS was 80.3% after Sublobar resection and 78.9% after Lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, pulmonary functions favored the Sublobar resection group.

It was concluded that Sublobar resection by either anatomical segmentectomy or wedge resection, for patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, was non inferior to Lobectomy, with respect to Disease Free Survival and with similar Overall Survival, and is an effective management approach for this subgroup of patients with NSCLC.

Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Altorki N, Wang X, Kozono D, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:489-498