Author: RR

NUBEQA® Combination Improves Overall Survival in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed with Prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 268,490 new cases of Prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and 34,500 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of Prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced Prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention.

The first-generation NonSteroidal Anti-Androgen (NSAA) agents such as EULEXIN® (Flutamide), CASODEX® (Bicalutamide) and NILANDRON® (Nilutamide) act by binding to the Androgen Receptor (AR) and prevent the activation of the AR and subsequent up-regulation of androgen responsive genes. They may also accelerate the degradation of the AR. These agents have a range of pharmacologic activity from being pure anti-androgens to androgen agonists. CASODEX® is often prescribed along with GnRH (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone) agonists for metastatic disease, or as a single agent second line hormonal therapy for those who had progressed on LHRH agonists.

NUBEQA® (Darolutamide) is a potent second-generation Androgen Receptor (AR) inhibitor with a new chemical structure and has a high affinity to the AR. NUBEQA® does not cross the blood-brain barrier and for this reason has a favorable safety and tolerability profile in prespecified adverse events such as seizures, when compared with other second-generation AR inhibitors such as ERLEADA® (Apalutamide) and XTANDI® (Enzalutamide). It has been associated with increased Overall Survival (OS) among patients with non-metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) and has been approved by the FDA for this indication. Whether a combination of NUBEQA®, in combination with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), and Docetaxel would increase survival among patients with metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, is unknown.

ARASENS is an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of NUBEQA® (Darolutamide) added to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and Docetaxel in patients with metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer. In this study, a total of 1306 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive NUBEQA® (N=651) or placebo (N=655), both in combination with ADT and Docetaxel. All the patients received ADT (either a Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone (LHRH} agonist or antagonist) or underwent Orchiectomy within 12 weeks before randomization and received six cycles of Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV given on Day 1 every 21 days, with Prednisone or Prednisolone. Patients received LHRH agonists along with a first-generation anti-androgen agent for at least 4 weeks before randomization to help prevent a tumor flare, and the anti-androgen agent was discontinued before randomization. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive either NUBEQA® 600 mg orally twice daily or matched placebo, and treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.

Eligible patients had biopsy proven prostate cancer with bone metastases and had to be candidates for ADT and Docetaxel. Patients with regional lymph node involvement only (N1, below the aortic bifurcation) or if they had received ADT more than 12 weeks before randomization, second-generation Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for prostate cancer before randomization, or radiotherapy within 2 weeks before randomization, were excluded. The median age was 67 years and both treatment groups were well balanced. All patients had metastatic disease at baseline, 78% of the patients had a Gleason score of 8 or greater, about 80% had bone metastases (Stage M1b) and 18% had visceral metastases (Stage M1c). The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS) and Secondary end points included were time to Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, time to pain progression, symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival and time to initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy, as well as Safety. The median follow up for Overall Survival was 43 months.

The median Overall Survival was not estimable in the NUBEQA® group versus 48.9 months in the placebo group. The addition of NUBEQA® to the combination with ADT and Docetaxel reduced the risk of death by 32%, compared to the placebo group (HR=0.68; P<0.001). This OS benefit was noted across most subgroups. Further, the significant OS benefit with the addition of NUBEQA® was observed, despite receipt of subsequent life-prolonging systemic therapies such as different Androgen-Receptor pathway inhibitors by 75.6% of patients in the placebo control group. The OS at 4 years was 62.7% in the NUBEQA® group and 50.4% in the placebo group.

With regard to Secondary endpoints, the addition of NUBEQA® to ADT and Docetaxel demonstrated consistent benefits. The time to development of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer was significantly longer in the NUBEQA® group (HR=0.36; P<0.001), the time to pain progression was also significantly longer in the NUBEQA® group (HR=0.79; P=0.01), as well as symptomatic Skeletal Event-Free Survival (HR=0.61; P<0.001). Further, the time to the initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy was also significantly longer in the NUBEQA® group (HR=0.39; P<0.001). Adverse events were similar in the two groups.

The authors concluded that among patients with metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer, the addition of NUBEQA® to Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Docetaxel resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival, as well as improvement in key Secondary end points, with no increase in adverse events.

Darolutamide and Survival in Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Smith MR, Hussain Saad F, et al. for the ARASENS Trial Investigators. NEJM. February 17, 2022. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119115.

Smoking Cessation after Lung Cancer Diagnosis Improves Overall Survival

RR

SUMMARY: According to the American Cancer Society, tobacco use is responsible for about 1 in 5 deaths in the United States and is the leading preventable cause of death in the US. Smoking (cigarettes, cigars, and pipes) is responsible for about 20% of all cancers and about 30% of all cancer deaths in the US. Approximately 80% of lung cancers, as well as about 80% of all lung cancer deaths, are due to smoking, and lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Smoking also increases the risk for cancers of the Oral cavity, Oropharynx, Larynx, Esophagus, Stomach, Liver, Pancreas, Colon/Rectum, Kidney, Bladder, Cervix, as well as Acute Myeloid Leukemia. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2022, about 236,740 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,360 patients will die of the disease. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Previous published studies have shown that individuals who start smoking at a younger age have greater mortality risk than those who start smoking later in life, and smoking cessation especially at younger ages substantially reduces that mortality risk. Several biologic mechanisms have been hypothesized, to explain the beneficial effect of smoking cessation on survival, in patients with Lung Cancer. Tobacco smoke has been shown to promote tumor growth, progression, and dissemination, while decreasing the efficacy and tolerance to radiation and systemic therapy. Further, it is well established that smoking increases the risk of postoperative complications and second primary cancers. Epigenetic changes induced by tobacco smoke may play an important role, and cigarette smoke induced diseases may be the result of alterations in DNA methylation, and is a reversible gene regulatory modification. Following smoking cessation, the majority of the differentially methylated CpG dinucleotide sites of the current smokers return to the level of the never smokers within 5 years of smoking cessation. However, some of the methylated genes may not return to the level of the never smokers even after 30 years of smoking cessation, suggesting that tobacco smoke can lead to lasting damage to human health. In this publication, the researchers aimed to summarize the current scientific evidence on whether quitting smoking at or around diagnosis has a beneficial effect on the survival of Lung Cancer patients.

The authors conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the studies that evaluated the prognostic effect of quitting smoking at or around diagnosis among patients with Lung Cancer. The meta-analysis included 21 articles published between 1980 and October 2021 on the effect of smoking cessation at or around the time of diagnosis among a total of 10,938 patients with lung cancer, which included patients with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Small Cell Lung Cancer, as well as patients with Lung Cancer of both or unspecified subtypes or whose subtype was not specified. In most studies analyzed, the median age at Lung Cancer diagnosis was between 60 and 70 years. The authors used random effect meta-analysis models to pool study-specific data into Summary Relative Risk (SRR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). There was substantial variability across studies with regards to study design, patient characteristics, treatments received, criteria used to define smoking status (quitters or continued), and duration of follow up.

Even though there was moderate heterogeneity of Hazard Ratio across studies, it was noted that quitting smoking at or around diagnosis was associated with a significant 29% improvement in Overall Survival, compared with patients who continued to smoke after their diagnosis (SRR=0.71; 95% CI 0.64–0.80). This benefit of quitting smoking was noted regardless of lung cancer histologic subtype, with a 20-30% reduction in the risk of death among those who quit smoking post-diagnosis, compared to those who continued to smoke.

It was concluded from this analysis that quitting smoking at or around diagnosis is associated with a beneficial effect on the survival of Lung Cancer patients, and smoking cessation can be nearly as effective in improving the chance of survival as treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiation therapy. The authors added that based on these finding, Health Care Providers should educate Lung Cancer patients about the benefits of quitting smoking even after diagnosis and provide them with the necessary support for smoking cessation.

Quitting Smoking At or Around Diagnosis Improves the Overall Survival of Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Caini S, Riccio MD, Vettori V, et al. Published:January 04, 2022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.12.005

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts the Efficacy of KEYTRUDA® in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 (Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1) inhibitors, also called Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm for patients with solid tumors, with significant improvement in outcomes. However, even among those with tumors expressing high PD-L1 expression and high Tumor Mutation Burden, not all patients benefit from Immunotherapy with ICIs. Therefore identifying biomarkers for patients likely to respond to ICI therapy, and predicting resistance is important and relevant, in selecting the appropriate patients for treatment with ICIs.

There is growing body of evidence on the role of inflammation in cancer biology, and systemic inflammatory response may have prognostic significance in different cancer types. Inflammatory process in various cancers imparts immunoresistance to ICIs, by activating oncogenic signaling pathways, there by promoting cancer growth and dissemination, with resulting poor outcomes.

More recently, attention has been focused on the predictive role of Platelet-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as an effective indicator of the severity of systemic inflammatory response. PLR is defined as the ratio of platelets to lymphocytes. Platelets and lymphocytes play multiple roles in the inflammatory response. Increased platelet count accelerates tumor progression by promoting neoangiogenesis and the production of adhesion molecules, whereas lymphocytes activate anti-tumor immunity by releasing a range of cytokines. Elevated PLR has been associated with poor prognosis in multiple solid tumors. In a meta-analysis of data from 12 related studies involving a total of 1340 patients, high PLR in cancer patients was associated with poor efficacy when treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, and poor prognosis. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105957Get rights and content). Several other studies suggest that using PLR to predict the prognosis of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy remains controversial. The role of PLR in the prognosis of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy has thus remained unclear.

The present study was conducted to determine meaningful predictive factors for selecting patients with advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) who might benefit clinically from treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab). KEYTRUDA® is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. It thereby reverses the PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, and unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells. The researchers retrospectively analyzed 54 patients who received treatment with KEYTRUDA® for Urothelial Carcinoma. Patient’s Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte and Platelet (HALP) score, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) were calculated as indices of systemic inflammatory response. The relationships between these scores and the initial tumor response or Overall Survival, as well as other clinicopathological factors, were then assessed.

It was noted that a high NLR and PLR were associated with a poor initial tumor response to KEYTRUDA®. A HALP score less than 30.05 and a PLR of 173.73 or more were associated with worse Overall Survival. In the multivariate analysis, a high PLR was a significant independent prognostic factor for unfavorable outcomes.

The authors concluded from this study that a high pretreatment Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio may be a valuable indicator for choosing therapy other than KEYTRUDA® in patients with advanced Urothelial Carcinoma, and may be a potential biomarker for immunotherapy.

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma. Kurashina R, Ando K, Inoue M, et al. Anticancer Research February 2022;42:1131-1136.

Cytoreductive Surgery for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Improves Overall Survival

RR

SUMMARY: It is estimated that in the United States, approximately 19,880 women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2022 and 12,810 women will die of the disease. Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women, and accounts for more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. Approximately 75% of the ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Approximately 85% of all ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin, and approximately 70% of all epithelial ovarian cancers are High-Grade Serous adenocarcinomas. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer often receive primary cytoreductive surgery with the goal of resecting all macroscopic tumor, followed by chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab or a PARP inhibitor. This intervention has been associated with superior Progression Free Survival. However, approximately 70% of these patients will relapse within the subsequent 3 years and are incurable. Following a relapse, patients are treated with systemic therapy, and very few trials have shown evidence of a significant Overall Survival benefit in this setting. The role of a second cytoreductive surgery in relapsed ovarian cancer has not been well defined.

The researchers therefore conducted a prospectively randomized Phase III trial (DESKTOP III), that evaluated secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. This study was designed based on previously published studies, showing the beneficial role of complete resection at first relapse, which superseded the effect of cytoreduction in upfront surgery, as well as the confirmed value of the AGO (ArbeitsgemeinschaftGynäkologischeOnkologie) score in predicting complete resectability of a tumor. A total of 407 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, who had a first relapse after a platinum-free interval of 6 months or more, were randomly assigned 1:1 to secondary cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy with a platinum-based regimen (N=206) or platinum-based chemotherapy alone (N=201). Eligible patients had relapsed histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer (clinically defined as a lesion that is palpable or visible or that is visible on ultrasonographic imaging) or relapsed disease radiologically diagnosed at least 6 months after the last course of initial platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-sensitive disease) and had a positive AGO score. A positive AGO score was defined as an ECOG Performance Status of 0, ascites of less than 500 ml, and complete resection at initial surgery, and this score was used to identify patients in whom a complete resection might be achieved. An elevated Cancer Antigen 125 level alone was not deemed to be an acceptable entry criterion. A complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 75.5% of the patients in the surgery group who underwent the procedure. The median duration of surgery was 3.7 hours, the median estimated blood loss was 250 ml, and was associated with low incidence of adverse events related to surgery. The Primary end point was Overall Survival (OS) and additionally Quality of Life and prognostic factors for survival were also assessed.

With a median follow up of 70 months, the median Overall Survival was significantly longer at 53.7 months in the surgery group and 46.0 months in the no-surgery group (HR for death= 0.75; P=0.02). Patients with a complete resection had the most favorable outcome, with a median Overall Survival of 61.9 months among patients in the surgery group who had complete resection, as compared with 27.7 months among patients who did not have complete resection. The median Progression Free Survival was also longer at 18.4 months in the surgery group and 14.0 months in the no-surgery group (HR for progression or death=0.66). A benefit from surgery was seen in all prognostic subgroups analyzed including age, Stage at initial diagnosis, histologic subtype, treatment history that included previous maintenance therapy, and platinum-free interval (6-12 months or more than 12 months). Quality of life measures were similar between the treatment groups at 6 months and 12 months and there was no perioperative mortality within 30 days after surgery. These findings underscore the importance of surgical skill needed to successfully perform secondary cytoreductive surgery, with resulting complete macroscopic resection.

It was concluded that in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery performed before second line chemotherapy resulted in longer Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival, as compared to chemotherapy alone, without negatively impacting Quality of Life.

Randomized Trial of Cytoreductive Surgery for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer. Harter P, Sehouli J, Vergote I, et al., for the DESKTOP III Investigators. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2123-2131.

Cancer Risks Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants

RR

SUMMARY: DNA damage is a common occurrence in daily life by UV light, ionizing radiation, replication errors, chemical agents, etc. This can result in single and double strand breaks in the DNA structure which must be repaired for cell survival. The vital pathways for DNA repair in a normal cell are BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes recognize and repair double strand DNA breaks via Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Homologous Recombination is a type of genetic recombination, and is a DNA repair pathway utilized by cells to accurately repair DNA double-stranded breaks during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and thereby maintain genomic integrity. Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) is noted following mutation of genes involved in HR repair pathway.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes located on chromosome 17 and chromosome 13 respectively and functional BRCA proteins repair damaged DNA, and play an important role in maintaining cellular genetic integrity. They regulate cell growth and prevent abnormal cell division and development of malignancy. Mutations in these genes predispose an individual to develop malignant tumors. It is well established that the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations can significantly increase the lifetime risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer, as high as 85% and 40% respectively.

BRCA mutations can either be inherited (Germline) and present in all individual cells or can be acquired and occur exclusively in the tumor cells (Somatic). Somatic mutations account for a significant portion of overall BRCA1 and BRCA2 aberrations. Loss of BRCA function due to frequent somatic aberrations likely deregulates HR pathway, and other pathways then come in to play, which are less precise and error prone, resulting in the accumulation of additional mutations and chromosomal instability in the cell, with subsequent malignant transformation. Homologous Recombination Deficiency therefore indicates an important loss of DNA repair function.

Pathogenic Variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are well known to be associated with increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer in women, and reliable risk estimates are also available and can be as high as 85% and 40% respectively. However, the association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants with cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers remain uncertain, and these associations have been based on studies with relatively small sample sizes, resulting in imprecise cancer risk estimates. It is therefore important that precise risk estimates are available, in order to optimize clinical management strategies and guidelines for cancer risk management in female and male BRCA1/2 carriers. The NCCN and other guidelines recommend breast and ovarian cancer screening for BRCA1/2 carriers, prostate cancer screening for BRCA2 carriers. Screening is also recommended for pancreatic cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers, but only in the presence of a positive family history of the disease.

The authors conducted this analysis to provide comprehensive and precise age-specific risk estimates of 22 cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers associated with Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, for effective cancer risk management. The researchers used data from 3,184 BRCA1 families and 2,157 BRCA2 families in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA), to estimate age-specific Relative Risk (RR) and absolute risks for 22 first primary cancer types, after adjusting for family ascertainment. CIMBA was formed by a collaborative group of researchers working on genetic modifiers of cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and provides sufficient sample sizes to allow large scale studies, in order to reliably evaluate the effects of genetic modifiers.

BRCA1 Pathogenic Variants were associated with significantly increased risk of male breast cancer (RR = 4.30; 4.3 times increased risk), pancreatic cancer (RR = 2.36), and stomach cancer (RR = 2.17). Although associations of BRCA1 Pathogenic Variants with colorectal and gallbladder cancers were observed, the results were not robust in the sensitivity analyses performed.

BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants were associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (RR = 44.0), stomach cancer (RR = 3.69), pancreatic cancer (RR = 3.34) and prostate cancer (RR = 2.22). Female carriers had a higher risk of stomach cancer than male carriers (RR = 6.89 versus 2.76; P=0.04).

The absolute/cumulative risks to age 80 years ranged from 0.4% for male breast cancer to approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer for BRCA1 carriers and from approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer to 27% for prostate cancer for BRCA2 carriers. In the present study, previously suggested associations of BRCA1 Pathogenic Variants with risks of other genitourinary cancers and increased risk of bone, brain, blood, gallbladder cancers and melanoma for BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants, were not replicated.

It was concluded from this analysis that in addition to female breast and ovarian cancers, BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants are associated with increased risks of male breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, and prostate cancer, the later only with BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants , but are not associated with the risks of other previously suggested cancers. These findings provide age-specific cancer risk estimates and will allow for improved cancer risk assessment of male and female BRCA1/2 carriers.

Cancer Risks Associated With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants. Li S, Silvestri V, Leslie G, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02112 Journal of Clinical Oncology – published online before print January 25, 2022.

OPDIVO® Combination Improves Overall Survival in Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2022, about 20,640 new cases of esophageal cancer will be diagnosed in the US and about 16,410 individuals will die of the disease. It is the sixth most common cause of global cancer death. Squamous Cell Carcinoma is the most common type of cancer of the esophagus among African Americans, while Adenocarcinoma is more common in Caucasians. Squamous Cell Carcinoma accounts for approximately 85% of cases.

Majority of esophageal cancers are unresectable at diagnosis, and most patients treated with curative intent eventually will relapse and only about 20% of patients will survive at least 5 years following diagnosis. Patients with advanced esophageal cancer have a median survival of less than a year when treated with the standard Fluoropyrimidine plus Platinum based chemotherapy. For those patients progressing on first line chemotherapy, treatment options are limited, with a 5-year relative survival rate of 8% or less.

OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response and unleashing the T cells. It has been noted that approximately 50% of patients with advanced esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma express tumor-cell Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) greater than 1%. In the ATTRACTION-3 multicentre, Phase III trial, treatment with OPDIVO® was associated with a significant improvement in Overall Survival, compared with chemotherapy, in previously treated patients with advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, regardless of PD-L1 expression. In the CheckMate 649 Phase III trial involving patients with gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal adenocarcinoma, first-line treatment with OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy resulted in a significant Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) benefit, as compared with chemotherapy alone, as well as durable Objective Response Rate (ORR), with an acceptable safety profile.

CheckMate 648 is a global, open-label, Phase III trial in which the efficacy and safety of both an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy and a dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor combination was evaluated in previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. The researchers herein reported the results for OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy and for OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® (Ipilimumab) as compared with chemotherapy alone.

In this study, 970 patients with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy (N=321), OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® (N=325), or chemotherapy alone. Patients in the OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy group received OPDIVO® 240 mg IV every 2 weeks and chemotherapy consisted of Fluorouracil 800 mg/m2 IV Days 1-5 and Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, given every 4 weeks. The OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® group received OPDIVO® 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks plus YERVOY® 1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients could receive OPDIVO® or OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® for a maximum of 2 years. Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were balanced across the treatment groups and in patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (49% of patients in each treatment group had tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater). The Primary end points were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS), as determined by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), with hierarchical testing performed first in patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater and then in the overall population. The Secondary end points included Objective Response Rate (ORR), which was also assessed by BICR.

After a minimum follow up period of 13 months, Overall Survival was significantly longer with OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, both among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (15.4 months versus 9.1 months; HR=0.54; P<0.001) and in the overall population (13.2 months versus 10.7 months; HR=0.74; P=0.002). These findings suggested a 46% and 26% lower risk of death respectively with OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy, than with chemotherapy alone. Overall Survival was also significantly longer with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® than with chemotherapy among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (13.7 months versus 9.1 months; HR=0.64; P=0.001) and in the overall population (12.7 months versus 10.7 months; HR=0.78; P=0.01).

There was a significant improvement in Progression Free Survival seen with OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (HR=0.65; P=0.002). This PFS benefit was not seen with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY®, as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related Adverse Events was 47% with OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy, 32% with OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® and 36% with chemotherapy alone.

Treatment with either OPDIVO®-based regimens resulted in a higher Complete Response rate, as well as in more durable responses, than chemotherapy alone. Of the three treatment regimens, OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy led to the highest Objective Response Rate and OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® resulted in the longest median Duration of Response.

It was concluded that first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma with either OPDIVO® plus chemotherapy or OPDIVO® plus YERVOY® resulted in a significantly longer Overall Survival benefit and durable responses, than chemotherapy alone.

Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, et al. N Engl J Med 2022;386:449-462