SUMMARY: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is one of the hard-to-treat cancers for which chemotherapy has not demonstrated any survival benefit – that is, until now. In a recently presented randomized phase III trial at the ASCO 2010 meeting, 250 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were assigned to receive either single agent Gemcitabine (GEMZAR®) or a combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, Irinotecan (CAMPTOSAR®) , and Oxaliplatin (ELOXATIN®) – (FOLFIRINOX regimen). Following an interim analysis, this trial had to be closed earlier than planned, based on the significantly positive results noted with the combination regimen. The median overall survival for patients in the FOLFIRINOX was 11.1 months compared with 6.8 months for those receiving single agent GEMZAR®. At one year, 48% of patients in the FOLFIRINOX group were alive compared to 20% for those in the GEMZAR® group. The median progression free survival was 6.4 months for the patients treated with FOLFIRINOX compared to 3.3 months for those treated with single agent GEMZAR®. Quality of life was also superior in the FOLFIRINOX group compared to those who were treated with GEMZAR®. For the very first time, we now have a combination chemotherapy regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer that confers survival benefit. J Clin Oncol 28:303s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 4010)
Month: May 2011
Phase III trial of bevacizumab (BEV) in the primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC) A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
SUMMARY: The role of Bevacizumab (AVASTIN®) in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer was evaluated in a large randomized double blind phase III trial. One thousand eight hundred and seventy three (1873) patients with stage III or IV disease, who were treatment naïve, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups – standard chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin given along with a placebo followed maintenance treatment with a placebo, standard chemotherapy given along with AVASTIN® followed by maintenance treatment with a placebo or standard chemotherapy given along with AVASTIN® followed by maintenance treatment with AVASTIN®. Patients receiving standard chemotherapy along with AVASTIN® followed by maintenance AVASTIN® had a median Progression Free Survival of 14.1 months compared to 10.3 months for those who received standard chemotherapy alone. Interestingly, outcomes in patients receiving standard chemotherapy along with AVASTIN® followed by placebo maintenance did no better than those who received standard chemotherapy alone. To date, addition of AVASTIN® to standard chemotherapy followed by AVASTIN® maintenance has not resulted in significant improvement in overall survival. J Clin Oncol 28:18s, 2010 (suppl; abstr LBA1)
Nilotinib versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
SUMMARY: ENESTnd (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials-Newly Diagnosed Patients) is a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of Nilotinib (TASIGNA®), either 300 mg or 400 mg bid with GLEEVEC® (Imatinib) 400mg qd, in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML in chronic phase. Of the 846 patients enrolled, 282 patients received TASIGNA® 300 mg bid, 281 patients received TASIGNA® 400 mg bid and 283 patients received GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd. With a median follow up of 18 months, the MMR (Major Molecular Response) was 66% for the TASIGNA® 300 mg bid group and 62% for the TASIGNA® 400 mg bid group compared with 40% for the GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd group. The median time to MMR amongst the patients who achieved MMR was faster for TASIGNA® 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and TASIGNA® 400 mg bid (5.8 months) groups of patients compared with GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd (8.3 months). The rates of complete cytogenetic response at 18 months were also significantly higher for both TASIGNA® groups – 85% in the TASIGNA® 300 mg bid group, 82% in the TASIGNA® 400 mg bid group and 74% in the GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd group. Fewer patients in the TASIGNA® groups progressed to accelerated phase or blast crises compared with GLEEVEC® group. Adverse effects more often seen with TASIGNA® included skin rash, headache, liver function abnormalities, high cholesterol, hyperglycemia, increased serum lipase, abnormal electrolyte levels and prolongation of the QT interval. The authors concluded that TASIGNA® at both 300 mg bid and 400 mg bid induced significantly higher and faster rates of MMR and complete cytogenetic remission compared with GLEEVEC® 400 mg qd. J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 6501)
Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment a randomised open-label trial
SUMMARY: The TROPIC trial (Treatment of Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a docetaxel (TAXOTERE®)- Containing Regimen) involved 755 men in 26 countries with metastatic prostate cancer who were castration resistant. Patients were randomized to receive either Cabazitaxel (JEVTANA®) 25 mg/m2 or Mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 three times a week and both groups received prednisone 10 mg daily through out the course of their treatment. The combination of JEVTANA® and prednisone resulted in median overall survival of 15.1 months compared to 12.7 months for the Mitoxantrone group. There was a 30% reduction in the risk of death for the JEVTANA® group. This led to the approval of JEVTANA® for the treatment of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer, previously treated with a TAXOTERE® containing regimen. Lancet 2010;376:1147-1154
Results of a randomized, phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) and carboplatin (C) compared with cremophor-based paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
SUMMARY: In this randomized phase III trial, the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®) and carboplatin was compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced NSCLC of all histologic types. Patients enrolled were chemonaïve, with stage IIIb and stage IV non small cell lung cancer. Five hundred and twenty one (521) received ABRAXANE® without any premedications at 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 along with carboplatin given on day 1 at an AUC of 6. The control group of 525 patients received standard Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 on day 1. The primary end point was overall response rate. The ABRAXANE® group had a response rate of 33% compared to 25% for the standard paclitaxel group. When broken down by histology, the response rates in those with squamous cell carcinoma was 41% in the ABRAXANE® group versus 24% in the standard paclitaxel arm and the non squamous subtypes had a response rate of 26% versus 25% in the ABRAXANE® and paclitaxel group respectively. It is hypothesized that the superior response rates in squamous cell histology may be due to the overexpression by this sub type of an albumin receptor called Caveolin–1. ABRAXANE® which is an albumin bound paclitaxel utilizes the albumin receptor Caveolin-1 (CAV1) pathway and thereby may achieve a higher intratumoral drug concentration. J Clin Oncol 28:18s, 2010 (suppl; abstr LBA7511)